Consequential - Judgment Search Results

Punjab National Bank Vs. Pnb Employees Union and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (2006)ILLJ758Raj; 2005(4)WLC516

shiv kumar sharma j 1 award dated august 12 2004 of central government industrial tribunal cum labour court jaipur for...

R.J. Foujdar Bus Service Vs. Ganpat Singh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2007ACJ1591

arun mishra j 1 these appeals arise out of same accident hence are being decided by the common order 2...

Kailash Chandra-ii, Son of Shri Khacheru Giri Vs. State of U.P. Throug ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2005(2)ESC1158; (2005)2UPLBEC1328

..... petition upon which the petitioner has placed reliance for his reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits including full back wages and pensionary benefits can with stand the test of ..... accused in the same crime and government employees have been reinstated in service with all consequential benefits including back wages alongwith the arrears of salary and other allowances and regular .....

Jaidev Sethi Vs. Maharaj Krishan Sethi

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR2006J& K1

..... seeks a declaration the court has to consider whether a consequential relief is implicit in the declaration or in other words ..... dispute nonetheless the petitioner was required to also seek the consequential relief though the banks have not been impleaded as party ..... seen above where the plaintiff merely seeks declaration but the consequential relief is implicit in the declaration or where the effect .....

Smt. Bhagwati Rampal and anr. Vs. State Bank of India

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2006HP57

..... the present suit it was further found that application for temporary injunction without claiming the consequential relief of permanent injunction in the main suit would not be maintainable in the ..... only made a prayer for declaration without any prayer for permanent injunction by way of consequential relief 12 in jayathirth ramacharya gudi v bindumadhavacharya srinivasacharya gudi 1996 2 ccc 216 1996 .....

Dr. Bhaskar Ranjan Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Reported in: (2006)(2)SLJ253CAT

..... 7 06 2000 this tribunal allowed the application by quashing the disciplinary proceedings with all consequential benefits the respondents in that o a had challenged the said order before the hon ..... issued in the year 1992 when the tribunal has granted the relief of reinstatement with consequential benefits under the said order the applicant is entitled for promotion it was further contended .....

Lalchand Bhangdia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2005)279ITR135(Hyd.)

..... appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that there is substantial delay in passing the consequential orders and if the interpretation placed upon the provisions of the act by the commissioner ..... interest under section 214 of the act since the assessing officer has not passed the consequential order within a reasonable time assessee cannot be deprived of the legitimate amount refundable for .....

Pithapuram Municipality Vs. Christian Medical Centre

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(3)ALD813

..... by the defendant municipality as illegal and not binding on the plaintiff and also for consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from collecting the tax and also for ..... illegal capricious arbitrary opposed to law and is not binding on the plaintiff and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendant from collecting the enhanced property tax of rs 686 .....

Meena Chakraborty Vs. Management of United Bank and anr.

Court: Guwahati

..... petitioner would be entitled to reinstatement in service without any back wages and without any consequential service benefits aggrieved the present writ application has been filed 4 i have heard shri ..... to be unauthorisedely absent during the period in question the relief of back wages and consequential service benefits cannot be legal by conferred on the petitioner 7 the rival submissions advanced .....

B.B. Sharma and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2006(2)JKJ124

..... grade the rule of reservation gives accelerated promotion but it does not give the accelerated consequential seniority if a scheduled caste scheduled tribe candidate is promoted earlier because of the rule ..... reading of this rule clearly establish that the state has not made any provision for consequential seniority in favour of the reserved category candidates on the other hand the rule pertains .....