Conniver - Judgment Search Results

B.P. Achala Anand Vs. S. Appi Reddy and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC986; 2005(4)BomCR823; (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN96; 117(2005)DLT354(SC); I(2005)DMC345SC; [2005(2)JCR21(SC)]; JT2005(2)SC233; 2005(3)KarLJ1; 2005(1)KLT904(SC); (2005)2MLJ; (2005) 3 SCC313

granted by the court if the court is satisfied that the tenant was not defending -- by collusion, connivance or neglect -- or was acting to the detriment of such persons. Such a situation would be rare

Divisional Forests Officers and ors. Vs. M. Ramalinga Reddy

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2226; JT2007(5)SC353; 2007(5)SCALE494; (2007)9SCC286; 2007(1)LC0551(SC); 2007AIRSCW3896

number was stated to be 6899/69. Allegedly, he got his name enlisted in the list of candidates in connivance with one Mr. Haranadha Reddy, the then Junior Assistant of District Employment Exchange, Nellore.3. Respondent was selected having

Harshendra Kumar D Vs. Rebatilata Koley Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2011SC1090

committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer

K.K. Ramachandran Master Vs. M.V. Sreyamakumar and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

by the first respondent, his election agent, polling agents, other agents, workers and campaigners with the consent and connivance of the first respondent. The averments in these paragraphs not only give the registration numbers of the vehicles

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC1325; 127(2006)DLT226; JT2006(2)SC448; 2006(2)SCALE364; (2006)3SCC399

part of the authorities in stopping such misuse. According to them, the officers were, in fact, encouraging or conniving with persons who were indulging in such misuse. The officers failed to carryout their statutory duties in stopping

Nahar Singh Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR1]; JT2008(4)SC441; (2008)IILLJ821SC; 2008(4)SCALE841; (2008)5SCC209; 2008(2)Supreme791

have occurred categorically goes to show that it could not have been possible without the active support and/or connivance of the appellant and other staff. Whereas in the report of Shri I.D. Nautial, full responsibility for shortage

Asif Mamu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC600; RLW2009(2)SC1364; 2008AIRSCW7744; 2008(6)LHSC4251

in conducting the investigation and trial, apart from uncooperative attitude of the private prosecutors, who appear to have connived with the culprits, leaving us with no other option but to painfully convert convictions of the appellants, some

U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. M/S. Mohan Meaking Ltd. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)738; [2000]101CompCas278(SC); 2000CriLJ1799; JT2000(3)SC466; 2000(2)SCALE532; (2000)3SCC745; [2000]2SCR566

by the statutory creation. Any Director, Manager or other officer of the company, who has consented to or connived in the commission of the said offence, is made liable for the punishment of the offence. This is

C.B.i. Vs. Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 105(2008)CLT137(SC); 2007CriLJ4708; [2008(2)JCR121(SC)]; JT2007(10)SC527; 2007(10)SCALE69

on its misconception of the scope of the relevant provisions of MCOCA and on its erroneous approach that connivance or deliberate inaction on the part of a police officer which facilitated the organised crime to flourish would

Faqir Chand Gulati Vs. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(4)ALD102(SC); 2008BusLR712(SC); III(2008)CPJ48(SC); 2008(4)CTC170; JT2008(7)SC552; (2008)6MLJ721(SC); 2008(II)OLR(SC)446; 2008(9)SCALE768; (2008)10SCC345; 2008[12]S.T; 2008AIRSCW5216; 2008(4)CivilLJ60; 2008(5)LH(SC)3748.

they often fail in discharging their duty. Either they don't act or do not act promptly or do connive at such activities apparently for illegitimate considerations. If such activities are to stop, some stringent actions are required