Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Conditionly - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 04 1889

Brush Vs. Condit

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-04-1889

Brush v. Condit - 132 U.S. 39 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Brush v. Condit, 132 U.S. 39 (1889) Brush v. Condit No. 9 Argued October 15-16, 1889 Decided November 4, 1889 132 U.S. 39 APPEAL FROM...


Sep 25 2018

Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-25-2018

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS ORDER Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Over the years, public interest litigation has brought immense social change through interventions...


Dec 13 2018

Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-13-2018

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No.26542 OF2018IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE : INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS Madan B. Lokur, J ORDER1 This application for directions and declarations has been filed...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2017

Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-15-2017

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS WITH I.A. No.68248 of 2017 JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Custodial violence has always been a matter of...


Apr 04 2005

Gosson Air Conditioning Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-04-2005

Reported in: 2008[12]STR96; [2009]19STT189

ORDERD.K. Jain, C.J.1. By this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for quashing of order dated 25-9-2003 (Annexure P.8) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,...


Aug 12 2004

Air Conditioning Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan Agriculture University

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-12-2004

Reported in: AIR2005Raj44; 2005(1)ARBLR309(Raj)

ORDERSunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The abovementioned two revision petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment as in both of them common questions of law and facts are involved :Facts of Revision Petition No. 1073/20022....


Mar 23 1995

Air Conditioning Specialists Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-23-1995

Reported in: (1996)2GLR448; [1996]221ITR739(Guj)

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner for a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside an order passed by the CIT, Baroda, on 14th Oct., 1985,...


May 15 2003

Air-conditioning Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board of Trustees for t ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-15-2003

Reported in: AIR2004Cal79

ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 49 and 52 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 asking the Court to declare the aforesaid two sections are...


Nov 02 2004

Trac Air Conditioning Systems Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-02-2004

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT327Tri(Bang.)

1. As the issues are related we decide all the four appeals in this order. The facts of the case in respect of appeal No. E/106 and 107/2000 are as follows :- 2. The appellants Track...


Sep 01 2005

Trac Air Conditioning Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Sep-01-2005

1. The appellant has filed this ROM application in respect of the Final Order Nos. 1711-1714/2004, dated 12-11-2004 [2005 (180) E.L.T. 327 (Tri. - Bang.)] under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.2. Shri S....


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial