Conditionate - Judgment Search Results

Air Conditioner Company of India Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT503TriDel

1. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty. The demand of Service tax was confirmed on the ground that the applicant has provided his services as Consultant to the contractor....

Classic Air Conditioners Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Pawan Kumar JaIn and Anothe ...

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

S.P. Saberwal, Member: 1. By this order we shall dispose of application dated 5.1.2001, filed by the appellant/applicant. It is stated in the application that the above mentioned appeal was filed by the appellant against respondent...

Tcl Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd Vs. the Judges of the Federal C ...

Court: Australia High Court

the New York Convention that "[e]ach Contracting State shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them" under conditions laid down in subsequent articles of the New York Convention. The UNCITRAL analytical commentary explained that close modelling

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Chemtec Water Conditioners P.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(115)ELT135TriDel

Engg., 1996 (88) E.L.T. 622 (S.C.) held that assembly, installation and erection of machinery, cleared in knocked down condition, at site in different sections, attached to earth by foundation, thus becoming immovable do not specify the test

M/S. Air Conditioner Co. of India Vs. Cce Meerut

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. The issue involved in this appeal, filed by M/s Air Conditioner Co.of India, is whether the Modvat Credit was available to them under Rule 57 H of the Central