Conditional Use - Judgment Search Results
Brush Vs. Condit
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-04-1889
Brush v. Condit - 132 U.S. 39 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Brush v. Condit, 132 U.S. 39 (1889) Brush v. Condit … latter embodied the principle of the invention carried out by equivalent means, the improvement, if any, in the use of the circular clamp over the rectangular clamp being only a question of degree in the use of
Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS ORDER Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Over the years, public interest litigation has brought immense social change through
Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-13-2018
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No.26542 OF2018IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE : INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS Madan B. Lokur, J ORDER1 This application for directions and declarations has been filed in which it
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Re-Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons Vs Vs. State of Assam
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.406 OF2013RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN1382PRISONS WITH I.A. No.68248 of 2017 JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Custodial violence has always been a matter … civilized societies. Custodial violence could take the form of third degree methods to extract information - the method used need not result in any physical violence but could be in the form of psychological violence. Custodial violence
Gosson Air Conditioning Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2005
Reported in: 2008[12]STR96; [2009]19STT189
ORDERD.K. Jain, C.J.1. By this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for quashing of order dated 25-9-2003 (Annexure P.8) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,...
Air Conditioning Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan Agriculture University
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-12-2004
Reported in: AIR2005Raj44; 2005(1)ARBLR309(Raj)
on 26-2-1998 and the total cost of work as estimated was about 2.49 crores. As per the contractual conditions, four bank guarantees were furnished by the petitioner from the Central Bank of India, Kolkata Branch, Kolkata.(ii) Since
Air Conditioning Specialists Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-23-1995
Reported in: (1996)2GLR448; [1996]221ITR739(Guj)
In that case, proceedings were initiated by Collector of Customs against petitioner-company on allegations that it had violated conditions of licence and illegally disposed of goods and thereby committed an offence punishable under the Customs Act. The
Air-conditioning Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board of Trustees for t ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-15-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Cal79
ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 49 and 52 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 asking the Court to declare the aforesaid two sections are...
Trac Air Conditioning Systems Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Nov-02-2004
Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT327Tri(Bang.)
Excise duty, investigations were conducted. The appellants were clearing the goods manufactured by them through M/s. Track Air Conditioners (P) Ltd. Bangalore (Known as TAPL) having sales offices at Bangalore, Hyderabad and Chennai. The management of both … services. M/s. TAPL promoted the sale of the equipment manufactured by the appellants. (5) Brand name 'TRAC' was used in the letterheads of both the Companies. The office premises of both the Companies were located in the
Trac Air Conditioning Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Sep-01-2005
1. The appellant has filed this ROM application in respect of the Final Order Nos. 1711-1714/2004, dated 12-11-2004 [2005 (180) E.L.T. 327 (Tri. - Bang.)] under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.2. Shri S....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free