Concurring - Judgment Search Results

L. Dwarka Dass Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Circle a Ward, Kanpur.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1956]29ITR60(All)

chaturvedi j this is a petition under article 226 of the constitution the petitioner was a partner of the firm...

Holder Vs. Hall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... remanded for consideration of respondents constitutional claim it is so ordered justice o connor concurring in part and concurring in the judgment i agree with justices kennedy and thomas that a plaintiff ..... 1966 suggesting that how close different districting systems come to providing persons 926 thomas j concurring in judgment mine whether members of a minority have had an equal opportunity to .....

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... another theory for abolishing the death penalty reflected in varying degrees in each of the concurring opinions today is predicated on the discriminatory impact argument quite apart from measuring the ..... precedent and the constitution s mandates than the several courses pursued by today s concurring opinions a final comment on the racial discrimination problem seems appropriate the possibility of .....

County of Allegheny Vs. Aclu

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 610 613 justice blackmun joined by justice stevens concluded in part iii b that the concurring and dissenting opinions in lynch v donnelly set forth the proper analytical framework for determining ..... o connor with whom justice brennan and justice stevens join as to part ii concurring in part and concurring in the judgment i judicial review of government action under the establishment clause .....

Hodgson Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

..... see also ante at 497 u s 471 marshall j concurring in part concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part accusing minnesota ..... stevens j cf ante at 497 u s 469 marshall j concurring in part concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part the court ..... notification see ante at 497 u s 471 472 marshall j concurring in part concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part the difference .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the remainder of the court s opinion justice blackmun concurring in part concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part ..... in the pennsylvania statute including the reporting requirements and therefore concurred in the judgment that the requirement that a pregnant ..... 1 identification of the physician who performed the abortion the concurring physician as required by section 3211 c 2 relating .....

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the discriminatory effects it is designed to eliminate fullilove supra at 513 powell j concurring moreover unresolved questions remain concerning the details of the complex regulatory regimes implicated ..... j with whom breyer j joins dissenting jenkins ante at 112 o connor j concurring noting the critical difference between unconstitutional discrimination and narrowly tailored remedial programs that .....

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. Vs. Pinette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jurisprudence is complex enough without the addition of this highly litigable feature 770 thomas j concurring religious expression cannot violate the establishment clause where it 1 is purely private and ..... circumstances and context of a particular challenged practice lynch supra at 694 o connor j concurring every government practice must be judged in its unique circumstances to determine whether it .....

Parents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adarand constructors inc v pea 515 u s 200 239 1995 scalia j concurring in part and concurring in judgment rather race based government decisionmaking is categorically prohibited unless narrowly tailored ..... rationally related to accomplishment of a permissible state policy id at 197 harlan j concurring the necessity test should be equally applicable in a case involving state racial discrimination .....

Van Orden Vs. Perry

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mandatory payment of taxes supporting ministers cutter supra at slip op at 4 thomas j concurring and government practices that have nothing to do with creating or maintaining coercive state ..... the clause reaches only the governmental coercion of individual belief or disbelief ante at 4 concurring opinion in my view although actual religious coercion is undoubtedly forbidden by the establishment .....