Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Conciliation - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 1962

Regional Conciliation Officer Vs. Kays Construction Company (Private) ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-15-1962

Reported in: (1962)IILLJ8All

(Private), Ltd., Allahabad, and paid to the appellants as mentioned in the annexure in consultation with the Regional Conciliation Officer, Allahabad, and under intimation to me...6. On 23 November 1958, respondent 1 before us filed certain written


Feb 12 2007

U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Conciliation Officer/ ...

Court: Uttaranchal

Decided on: Feb-12-2007

Reported in: (2007)IILLJ1038UC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.3. Briefly sated, an application was filed by the respondent No. 3 before the Regional Conciliation Officer/Assistant Labour Commissioner, Dehradun that his termination was wholly illegal and has also prayed for condonation of delay


Nov 01 2001

Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Nov-01-2001

Reported in: (2002)IILLJ70Guj

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat-petitioner has filed this petition challenging the action of respondent No. 1 Conciliation Officer, respondent No. 2 Deputy Labour Commissioner and respondent No. 3 Labour Commissioner, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, in not


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 01 2001

Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Nov-01-2001

Reported in: [2002(92)FLR728]

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat-petitioner has filed this petition challenging the action of respondent No. 1 Conciliation Officer, respondent No. 2 Deputy Labour Commissioner and respondent No. 3 Labour Commissioner, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, in not


Jun 18 2003

N. Ramathilagam Vs. Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-18-2003

Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ480Mad

for this matter has arisen entirely at Arakonam. The Government has appointed the Labour Officer, Vellore, as the Conciliation Officer for the factory situated at Vellore District including Arakonam and there was also a separate Labour Court


Aug 06 1997

Bhojraj Pandharinath Berad Vs. the Conciliation Officer and Asstt. Com ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-06-1997

Reported in: 1998(1)ALLMR112; 1998(2)BomCR837

and was terminated with effect from 1-8-1981 illegally. After receiving a copy of this notice on demand, the Conciliation Officer - Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Savedi Road, Ahmednagar intimated to the petitioner by communication dated 25-7-1996 that


Jun 09 1993

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Conciliation Officer and o ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-09-1993

Reported in: [1994(68)FLR275]; (1994)IILLJ41Bom

is a dispute regarding grant of status as a protected worker, the dispute could be referred to the Conciliation Officer. It seems that the said dispute has been filed at the instance of the respondent No. 2


Jun 17 1996

Shantimoy Mandal Vs. Conciliation Officer and Joint Commissioner of La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-17-1996

Reported in: 1996(3)ALD671; [1997(75)FLR603]; (1997)IILLJ539AP

Matched in: Parties Shantimoy Mandal Vs. Conciliation Officer and Joint Commissioner of Labour, Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.


Apr 08 1996

Narottam Ram Vs. Conciliation Officer and Jt. Commr. of Labour, Visakh ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-08-1996

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ871AP

Matched in: Parties Narottam Ram Vs. Conciliation Officer and Jt. Commr. of Labour, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and ors.


May 12 1993

Jila Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Conciliation Officer and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-12-1993

Reported in: [1994(68)FLR83]; (1995)ILLJ614All

1993 (Annexure No. 6) condoning the delay in making the application by the workman, respondent No. 2, for conciliation under Section 2A of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (compendiously the 'Act') may be quashed by issuing


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial