Concerned In - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: concerned in Page 1 of about 155 results (0.022 seconds)Mohata Concerns Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR725(Jhr)]
period of limitation, which was also received promptly by the concerned authorities of the respondents. The applicant was never served with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTriveni Concerns Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Reported in: (1992)40ITD213(Pune.)
material facts so far as the assessment year 1982-83 is concerned. The dissolution had taken place on 1-4-1982. This fact was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlastic Concern Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal
having supplied the specified quantity of HDPE powder to Plastic Concern for processing on their behalf and further stated that since
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConcerned Citizens Vs. Pine Creek Cons. Dist.
Court: US Supreme Court
Concerned Citizens v. Pine Creek Cons. Dist. - 429 U.S. 651
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStringfellow Vs. Concerned Neighbors
Court: US Supreme Court
Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors - 480 U.S. 370 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Stringfellow
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChamparan Cane Concern Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1963SC1737; [1963]49ITR152(SC); [1964]2SCR921
were discussed withcertain modifications with which we are not now concerned. Then, threeapplications in revision were filed to the Board of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConcerned Workmen of Sahai Industries Vs. B.D. Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: (1984)ILLJ165Del
L.L.J. 156 (Veeraswami, J.) held that the allegation that the concerned workman was employed elsewhere and was earning during the period
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSitalpore Colliery Concern Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1957Cal319,61CWN440,[1957]32ITR26(Cal)
is to be conducted. So far as Section 33 is concerned, it is expressly laid down that the Appellate Tribunal 'may
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayani Trading Concern Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: 1995(80)ELT263(Cal)
as invocation of Section 111(m) of the aforesaid Act is concerned, the same would be available to the Customs authorities in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPublic Concern for Governance Trust Charitable Trust Registered Under ...
Court: Mumbai
this Petition and with which this Court is presently not concerned), and hence sought to show their obligations and rights under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>