Concerned In - Judgment Search Results

Mohata Concerns Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(4)JCR725(Jhr)]

copy thereof was received by the Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board, Patna and endorsement was made by the concerned authorities that the objection would be considered on 15.2.1983. Yet, no inquiry was conducted either on 15.2.1983 or

Kays Concern Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1525; (1976)4SCC706; [1976]3SCR1042; 1976(8)LC547(SC)

be detained for a period exceeding three months without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board unless the concerned provision of law also provides for the maximum period for which such a person is to be detained.

Champaran Cane Concern Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1737; [1963]49ITR152(SC); [1964]2SCR921

to the DeputyCommissioner of Agricultural Income-tax. These appeals were discussed withcertain modifications with which we are not now concerned. Then, threeapplications in revision were filed to the Board of Revenue. The Board reducedthe assessment under schedule C

Venus Engineering Concern Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Kolkata

ORDER SHEET APO4542014 AP2742005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE VENUS ENGINEERING CONCERN PVT.LTD.Versus UNION OF INDIA BEFORE : The Hon’ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon’ble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY Date :

Perfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2710 of 2007 Perfect Electric Concern (P) Ltd., P.O. & P.S.­ Sunder Nagar, District­ Singhbhum (East) represented by its managing director Shri S.K. Basu,

Ms. Yuva Concerns (Dalton Press), Repre Vs. Smt. Anis Khan

Court: Andhra Pradesh

rights; that the petitioners have nothing to do with the property bearing municipal door No.5-9-101/3 and they are concerned only with house bearing municipal No.5-9-88, which was purchased by them about 25 years back; that there is

Tejus Proprietary Concern of Tejus Rohitkumar KapadiA. Vs. Union of In ...

Court: Mumbai

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) : 1. This appeal is directed against two orders passed by the CESTAT. By the first of the orders dated 9 May 2011, the Tribunal on an application for waiver of...

Public Concern for Governance Trust Charitable Trust Registered Under ... Overruled

Court: Mumbai

Urban Development Department. Respondent No. 3 is the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC). Respondent No. 4 is the concerned builder and Respondents Nos. 5 to 9 are the concerned housing societies.2. Respondent No. 2 - CIDCO grants

is Concerned the Joint Secretary Has Taken a “fair Vs. State of Hary ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

as follows: “We are of the view that so far as the cut-off date CWP No.11532 o”6. is concerned, the Joint Secretary has taken a “fair and just stand”.. We agree with her that all the applications

Association of Concerned Citizens of New Delhi vs.new Delhi Municipal ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.3348/2010 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi,