Concentric - Judgment Search Results

Mccarthy Vs. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating C

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 212 u s 569 1909 u s supreme court mccarthy v bunker hill sullivan mining concentrating c 212 u s 569 1909 212 u s 569 ex parte in the matter of ..... morison r waite and edmund wetmore for petitioner denied mccarthy v bunker hill sullivan mining concentrating c 212 u s 569 1909

The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. the Official Liquid ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2007]139CompCas591(Mad); (2008)1CompLJ181(Mad)

orderk raviraja pandian j 1 the above writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call...

Ferromet Concentrates Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR317

d g deshpande j 1 heard shri usgaonkar sr advocate for the petitioner and shri s k kakodkar sr advocate...

M/S Star Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs(Imports) Raigad

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... he specifically referred to the following discussion in the impugned order wherein ores and concentrates were treated as two different products which reads as under from the tariff description ..... given above the tariff uses the expression ores and concentrates further wherever the tariff wanted to prescribe different classification separate sub headings have been .....

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT33TriDel

..... therefore concluded that the royalty charges are includible in the assessable value of the concentrate as regards the advertisement expenses the assistant collector gave a finding that these ..... reference to the price charged by the manufacturer here the price charged for the concentrate being available the question of adding advertisement expenses incurred for the beverage product manufactured .....

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Cce, Tirunelveli and Cce, Madurai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

..... acid and phosphoric acid the basic input being one and the same namely copper concentrate copper concentrate gives sulphur dioxide which is converted to sulphur trioxide which in turn is converted ..... may be the requirements under any other law production of sulphur dioxide from copper concentrate upon roasting is a technological necessity this sulphur dioxide is commercially prepared from sulphide .....

Pepsi Foods Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT177TriDel

..... the product in which it was to be used such as lehar pepsi concentrate lehar seven up concentrate lehar mirinda concentrate etc 9 at page 21 para d 5 of their appeal memo ..... finished product inclusion of advertising expenses claimed to be included in the price of the concentrate establishes a linked between the royalty calculated with reference to the finished product and the .....

United States Vs. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sale of tangible commodities is somehow immune from the anticompetitive effects of undue concentration competition among banks exists at every level price variety of credit arrangements convenience ..... vis a vis larger businesses with which he competes in this fashion concentration in banking accelerates concentration generally we turn now to three affirmative justifications which appellees offer for .....

United States Vs. Von's Grocery Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... involving neither the elimination of direct competitors in the los angeles market nor increased concentration of the market there are substantial economic distinctions between such market extension mergers and ..... staff report to the federal trade commission economic inquiry into food marketing part i concentration and integration in retailing c vi retailer owned cooperative food wholesalers c vii .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... compensation prescribed in article 31 2 non justiciable in some specified laws dealing with concentration and distribution of wealth in the form of landed agricultural property this clearly negatived ..... genuine implementation of the directive principles a fundamental right will not suffer any dimunition concentration and control of community resources wealth and means of production in the hands of .....