Skip to content


Con - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: con Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 312 results (1.009 seconds)
Nov 19 2012 (HC)

M/S. Anant Raj Cons. and Development (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-19-2012

..... cwp no 4611 of 2012 date of decision november 19 2012 m s anant raj cons development p ltd petitioner s vs state of haryana and another respondent s coram hon .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2012 (TRI)

Shriram Life Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Branch Manager U-con P ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Oct-10-2012

exs b1 to b13 marked 5 the dist forum after considering the evidence placed on record opined that the deceased was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2012 (HC)

The Trustees of Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. Vs. M.P.State Industrial Dev. C ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-02-2012

com p no 4 2007 2 11 2012 shri sanjay agarwal with shri anuj agarwal counsel for petitioner shri piyush...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 2012 (HC)

M/S. Kancor Ingredients Limited Vs. the Regional Director (Kerala) and ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-02-2012

reveal that no reasons have been assigned to justify the conclusion arrived at it would not be sufficient to merely state

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 2012 (HC)

Rajammal and Others Vs. Hajira and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-16-2012

Reported in: 2012(3)ILR(Ker)563; 2012(3)KLT420; 2012(3)KLJ411

time earlier to hold them guilty of laches it was contended that the certificate of purchase in o a no 277

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2012 (FN)

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2012

..... so affects interstate commerce construing the commerce clause to permit con gress to regulate individuals precisely because they are doing nothing ..... whether the now truncated statute will operate in the manner con gress intended if not the remaining provisions must be invalidated ..... has not previously had occasion to consider severability in the con text of an omnibus enactment like the aca which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2012 (FN)

Miller Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-2012

..... category from the defendan t in harmelin our ruling thus neither overrules nor undermines nor con flicts with harmelin nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp alabama and arkansas along with the chief jus ..... justice alito join dissenting nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp determining the appropriate sentence for a teenager con victed of murder presents grave and challenging ques tions of morality and social policy our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2012 (FN)

Arizona Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-2012

..... countries requires the executive branch to ensure that enforcement policies are con sistent with this nation s foreign policy with respect to ..... provisions of arizona s law deprives states of what most would con sider the defining characteristic of sovereignty the power to exclude ..... to do something that they were by the government s con cession already authorized to do nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2012 (TRI)

Smt V. Madhavi Vs. Dr.K.Thirupal Reddy and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Dec-21-2012

..... c katare vs bombay hospital and medical research center and others 2010 5 ald cons 1 nc 2 baburao vithal lohakpure and another vs yuvraj lohakpure and others in ..... and another 2008 2scc 4 holi cross hospital vs maniram 2009 4 ald cons 1 nc 5 a k mittal vs raj kumar 2009 5 ald ..... upadhyaya and another vs dr d n mishra and others 2011 3 ald cons 5 nc 11 varanasi subrahmanyam vs dr ravi kumar 2004 1 ald .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 2012 (SC)

Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-21-2012

..... it is not necessary for the court to enter into the pros and cons of the matter or into a weighing and balancing of evidence and ..... crpc the magistrate should not make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence as if he was conducting ..... the magistrate should not make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence as if he was conducting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //