Con - Judgment Search Results

Chhatu Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1996CriLJ3313

..... ofipc or life convicts who have beenawarded life imprisonment a secondtime under ndps act or life con victs who have been imprisoned forlife second time under any offence b adults life convicts ..... their cases may be con who have been impri sidered after completionsoned for life but whose of 10 years of .....

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Vs. Newport News Sh ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... affected or aggrieved alone conveys but is rather an acknowledgment of the fact that what con stitutes adverse effect or aggrievement varies from statute to statute as the united states ..... significantly however the court observes that our precedent certainly establish es that congress could have con 137 ferred standing upon the owcp director without infringing article iii of the constitution ante .....

Field Vs. Mans

Court: US Supreme Court

..... property the mortgage deed had a clause calling for the fields con gary klein filed a brief for the national association of consumer ..... 1960 pub l 86 621 74 stat 409 6 in 1978 con 5 the one intervening change to the quoted language was that ..... to as justifiable reliance 12 following our established practice of finding con is given information that would excite suspicions of reasonably prudent man .....

Hercules, Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which many courts recognized before the agent orange settlement but which this court did not con product liability litigation 818 f 2d 187 189 1987 cert denied sub nom krupkin v ..... an implied in fact indemnity agreement 8 there is also reason to think that a con 7 hercules did not plead contractual indemnification in its complaint or raise the claim in .....

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regulate but congress may not justice breyer posits that there might be some limitations on con 565 gress commerce power such as family law or certain aspects of education post at ..... of commerce and articles that can be used to restrain commerce their possession is the con 603 sequence either directly or indirectly of commercial activity in my judgment congress power to .....

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on the subject it proceeds beyond even the analysis and interpretation of biblical texts to con 867 clude with the counsel to take action because that is the christian thing to ..... message of religious endorsement which she finds not to be present ante at 849 852 con 890 souter j dissenting curring opinion the opinion of the court concludes more expansively that .....

Bihar Chamber of Commerce and Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... of section 3 of the bihar tax on entry of goods into local areas for con sumption use or sale therein ordinance 1993 bihar ordinance no 11 of 1993 and proviso ..... ofassessment may not always be easy but nevertheless we must try to weigh the prosand cons urged before us by both the partiesand decide whether the lax levied by the actsatisfies .....

M/S. Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and Ot ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1996All135

..... be sold and for other purposes incidential thereto in the year 1964 united provinces molasses con trot act 1947 was repealed and an act known as u p sheera niyantran adhiniyam ..... the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matter in con iroversy it will not be a judgment in a matter which is governed by the .....

M/S. Gammon India Limited Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and Other ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1997P& H43; (1997)115PLR309

..... the petitioner that the board having once accepted all the terms and conditions of the con tract could not start varying the same however the petitioner keeping in line with the ..... towers tt disclosed to the board that they were on the verge of completing the con truction of the two nd cooling towers in andhra pradesh the board however had not .....

Suresh H. Rajput Etc. Vs. Bhartiben Pravinbhai Soni and Others Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)74; AIR1996SC2883; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)828; 1996CriLJ1621; JT1995(9)SC210; 1995(7)SCALE217; (1996)7SCC199; [1995]Supp5SCR747

..... prosecution at that stage it was not for the sanctioning authority to weigh pros and cons and then to find whether the case could end in conviction or acquittal or the ..... are not matters for the sanctioning authority to weigh and to consider the pros and cons of the case before granting sanction to lay prosecution against the respondents 13 considered from .....