Skip to content


Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: delhi Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.265 seconds)
Sep 02 2009 (HC)

The Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Sub ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-2009

Reported in : 2010(1)KarLJ383

..... of power sharing envisions both horizontal distribution between the three branches i e legislature executive and judicial and vertical centre state local bodies and panchayats autonomy is granted to certain specifically created bodies election commission comptroller and auditor general union public service commission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2009 (HC)

icai Accounting Research Foundation and anr. Vs. Director General of I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Del)27; [2010]321ITR73(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN462(Delhi)

was set up with the representatives from the office of comptroller auditor general of india the institute of chartered accountants of regime accounting standards expectation gap ethical standards for professional accountants auditors a study of global standards including indian standards 8 the this definition clarifies that advancement of any other object of general public utility will not be treated as charitable purpose if of the companies act this section reads as under 25 power to dispense with limited in name of charitable or other and money markets management information and capital systems management consultancy services and allied disciplines it is formed as a company and with the same question under the hyderabad general sales tax act the supreme court in state of andhra pradesh v h

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2009 (HC)

S.R. Batliboi and Co. Vs. Department of Income Tax (investigation)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-2009

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Del)369; [2009]315ITR137(Delhi); [2009]181TAXMAN9(Delhi)

opinion that the same privilege of confidentiality must extend to auditors as well similar views have been endorsed by a division 132 depends upon the evidence in each case and no general rule can be laid down in that behalf 14 coming is exercised bona fide and in furtherance of the statutory duties of the tax officers any error of judgment on the section 132 and emasculates the protective measures against these draconian powers 15 mr vikas singh learned senior advocate for the revenue has reason to believe that one or more of the conditions in section 132 1 exist the order is in the escaped taxation and sections 147 to 149 are pressed into service section 153 2 mandates broadly that the assessment must be which concerns the challenge to section 73 of the stamp act as substituted by act no 17 of 1986 permitting any

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2009 (HC)

S. Malkinder Singh and anr. Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committ ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-2009

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi153; 159(2009)DLT291

the succeeding year and therefore non holding of the annual general meeting for the purpose of holding elections to the executive board to exercise on behalf of the committee all the powers conferred upon it 5 a tug of war has been held till the rules are brought in line with the act and lastly it was sought to be contended that the terms of section 4 of the delhi sikh gurdwara act 1971 hereinafter referred to as the act the plaintiffs and the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 18 2009 (HC)

K.T. Corporation and ors. Vs. India Tourism Development Corporation an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2009

Reported in : 165(2009)DLT65

as a corporation is not performing any public functions or duties it is operating and maintaining hotels as a commercial venture court in style dress land supra has held that all powers of the state must be exercised for public good and entitled to ask for renewal on the same terms and conditions subject of course to itdc rejecting their requests for valid care of individual aspects like location disadvantage or low profit services 9 the appellants herein are commercial establishments who have set issued by the government of india for proceedings under the act are applicable it is stated that itdc has violated the where provisions of public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 can be invoked by the licensor in respect of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 2009 (HC)

Randhir Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT225

a statutory authority under the said act as the statutory power can be curtailed or abridged or taken away only by the relevant point of time is required to be construed condition no b referred to hereinbefore states that alternative accommodation would by the said notices under the provisions of the said act as being contrary to the above mentioned gadgil assurance h 3 of the public premises eviction of unauthorized occupants act 1971 claiming amounts as damages and another notice of even date

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2009 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Secretary to Government Ministry o ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2009

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT48

22nd september 2005 is still valid the learned additional solicitor general also did not contest before us that the two unexpected selected against a jm ur vacancy advertised in 2003 joined duties on 9th march 2005 but subsequently resigned and his resignation the fact that the selection was conducted by a high powered selection board presided over by a sitting judge of the 4a in the income tax appellate tribunal members recruitment and conditions of service rules 1963 nothing in this amendment disqualifies any the income tax appellate tribunal members recruitment and conditions of service rules 1963 nothing in this amendment disqualifies any of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 2009 (HC)

Dr. D.K. Attery Vs. Mr. Kanwal Singh Mehra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-09-2009

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT764

of securing the feeling of confidence of the people in general for true and proper administration of justice in the country power to punish for contempt of court is a special power vested under the constitution in the courts of record and the maintenance of the status quo with regard to the service of the petitioner but had also permitted dr raj mann into use the power contained under contempt s of court act 1971 in such a case the petitioner ought to be 11 and 12 of the contempt s of court act 1971 and punish them in accordance with law 6 an advance

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2009 (HC)

Saint-gobaIn Glass India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-2009

Reported in : 2009(166)LC71(Delhi); 2009(240)ELT495(Del)

remedy such injury 15 2 under rule 5 the director general on receipt of a written application by or on behalf of the director general safeguard rule 4 sets out the duties of the director general in particular to investigate existence of by this notification the central government in exercise of its powers under section 8c 2 of the act read with rules that contracting party in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause or threaten serious injury to domestic producers pre decisional hearing can be excluded in that case the services of an employee of the corporation were terminated on the rules made under the proviso to article 309 or under acts referable to that article generally provide for a right of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2009 (HC)

Contempt Proceedings Vs. Kanwar Singh Saini

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT466

act the commission has been empowered to exercise all the powers to punish for contempt which have been conferred upon a son gaurav saini however did not even enter appearance despite service of notice of contempt application the defendant contemner kanwar singh the contempt proceeding in terms of section 15 of the act 7 accordingly criminal appeal no 664 of 1997 is allowed in section 2 b of the contempt of courts act 1971 hereinafter referred to as the act is to be heard

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //