Comptroller - Judgment Search Results

Saranac Land and Timber Co. Vs. Comptroller

Court: US Supreme Court

Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller - 177 U.S. 318 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller, 177 U.S. 318

Comptroller and Auditor General Vs. Kamlesh Vadilal Mehta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1096; 2003(2)AWC1291(SC); [2003]113CompCas556(SC); (2003)2CompLJ181(SC); (2003)2GLR1; (2003)2GLR25; JT2003(1)SC330; 2003(1)SCALE351; (2003)2SCC349; [2003]1SCR471;

of a policy which is an administrative function and an exercise of statutory functions. The function of the Comptroller and Auditor General in respect of appointment of auditors for government corporations and public sector undertakings is statutorily

Comptroller and Auditor General of India and ors. Vs. Farid Sattar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000(85)FLR856]; JT2000(4)SC374; 2000(3)SCALE147; (2000)4SCC13; [2000]2SCR1067; (2000)2UPLBEC1735

Matched in: Parties Comptroller and Auditor General of India and ors. Vs. Farid Sattar

Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Others Vs. Mohan Lal Mehr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC2288; 1992(40)BLJR261; [1991(63)FLR699]; JT1991(4)SC138; 1991LabIC2328; (1992)ILLJ335SC; 1991(2)SCALE789; (1992)1SCC20; [1991]Supp1SCR482; 1992(1)SLJ1(SC); 1992(1)

by proviso to Article 309 and Clause (5) of Article 148 of the Constitution after consultations with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. These rules are known as 'Indian Audit & Accounts Department (Administrative Officers, Assistant

Comptroller and Auditor General of India and anr. Vs. K.S. Jagannathan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992Supp(2)SCC130

Central Administrative Tribunal in favour of the respondent is in accordance with the judgment of this Court in Comptroller and Auditor General of India v. K.S. Jagannathan1. The relevant portion of the judgment reads: (SCC pp. 705-06,

Comptroller and Auditor-general of India, Gian Prakash, New Delhi and ... Overruled

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC537; 1986(1)SCALE1077; (1986)2SCC679; [1986]2SCR17; 1986(2)SLJ1(SC)

Petition No. 10706 of 1981, in the Madras High Court praying for a writ of mandamus directing the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and the Accountant General-I, Madras - the Appellants before us - to make in

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Another Vs. Raghavend ...

Court: Karnataka

Matched in: Parties The Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Another Vs. Raghavendra and Others

Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Ors. vs Vinay Pratap Singh

Court: Delhi

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 822/2026 COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda, Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Mr. Manpreet

Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India Hr, Ir, Coordination a ...

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2702/2026DEPUTY COMPTROLLER AND AUDITORGENERAL OF INDIA HR, IR, COORDINATIONAND LEGAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda, Mr. Aditya

The Comptroller and Auditor General Through Deputy Cag vs Namita Kumar ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3430/2026, CM APPL. 16491/2026 and CM APPL. 16492/2026THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERALTHROUGH DEPUTY CAG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Sharma, Adv.versusNAMITA KUMARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Adv.[Appearance not