Compromise - Judgment Search Results
In Re: Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement Between Sharp Industries Limit ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-04-2004
Reported in: II(2005)BC373; 2005(1)BomCR13
seeking directions for holding meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors to consider and approve a scheme of compromise/arrangement proposed by it. In that company application, an order dated 27th August, 2004 in terms of the minutes
Chatur Bhuj Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Vs. Respective Statements with Regar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
IPC, registered at Police Station, Badshahpur, District Gurgaon, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Vide order dated 30.04.2013, the affected parties were directed to appear on 08.05.2013, before the learned Chief Judicial
Roy and Others. the Compromise Is Genuine and Bonafide and Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
406, 420, 323, 506, 34, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Sector 14, Panchkula, on the basis of compromise. While issuing notice, the Court stayed further proceedings against the petitioners before the trial Court. Both the parties
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cr.Misc. M 26231 of 2010 Vs. Muktsar on the Basis of Compromise.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
u/s 376/506 IPC and u/s 25/54/59 of the Arms Act registered at P.S.Sadar Muktsar on the basis of compromise. Respondent No.2 prosecutrix (name concealed) has put in appearance through her counsel Ms.Sunita Singh. Counsel for respondent No.2
“learned Counsel for the Petitioner Submits That a Compromise Vs. St ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
IPC at Police Station Banur, District Patiala and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. On 07.05.2012 the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been
Counsel for the Parties Filed Undertaking/Compromise Vs. Arun Garg and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2014
CR-4459-2014(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4459-2014(O&M) Date of decision: 5.8.2014 Sandeep Thapar ...Petitioner Versus Arun Garg and anr...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.A.S.Khara, Advocate for the...
Bedrock Ltd. (In the Matter of Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement Betwee ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-17-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)ALLMR729; 1998(4)BomCR710; (1998)2BOMLR5; [2000]101CompCas343(Bom)
391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed for the sanction of a scheme of compromise/arrangement, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1996 agreement.' This compromise agreement has been arrived at between the petitioner and
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free