Complainant - Judgment Search Results
c Vs.r
Court: THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(3&4)IBR201
Briefly stating the facts of the case are that the complainant filed a complaint against the respondent on the allegations that he engaged the respondent to file a case
c Vs.r
Court: THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Decided on: Nov-19-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)IBR155
APPEARANCE:For the complainant Mr. Denzil D' Mello.For the Respondent None.Per Shri S.K. Padhi, Member.This proceeding has been initiated at the instance
1ST Plaintiff Is Transposed vs a Gopalakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2025
of 2024, A 2020 of 2025 & A 1612/2024 1.A.Meerabai 2.A.Venugopal 3.S.Padmini 4.A.Raghunath ... Plaintiffs st rd 1 Plaintiff is transposed as 3 defendant as per order dated 11.09.2023 passed in Application No.4735 of 2023 vs. 1.A.Gopalakrishnan
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Nanjamma-Plaintiff No.1 Dead vs Smt Kalamma Defendant No.1 Died
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2024
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14777 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. NANJAMMA-PLAINTIFF NO.1 DEAD PETITIONERS NO.1...
Irulappan ...Plaintiff/Respo Vs. 1.Karuppian(Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2015
statement resisting the suit setting up a rival title based on certain title deeds and also disputing the plaintiff's possession of the property. 4.Necessary issues were framed. The trial Court tried the suit. To establish his case,
……… Plaintiff Vs. Mrs. Shelly Roy Chowdhury and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-21-2016
Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Ranjit Kumar Bag T.S No.3 of 2014 Mr. Atin Law ……… Plaintiff Versus Mrs. Shelly Roy Chowdhury & Anr. ……… Defendants For Plaintiff: Mr. Utpal Bose, Senior Advocate with Mr.
…plaintiff Vs. Sabitendra Nath Roy and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-13-2017
objection was not recorded in the Minute Book. On 15th October, 2014 the plaintiff sent a letter of complaint to the Regional Director, Eastern Region, Ministry of Corporate AffaiRs.defendant no.6 and the Registrar of Company, WB Ministry
... Plaintiff Vs. Samarendra Kumar Bardhan
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-11-2017
SUIT NO.10 OF2014P.L.A. No.48 OF2005IN THE GOODS OF : DR. SUDHANYA KUMAR BARDHAN AND SACHINDRA KUMAR BARDHAN ... Plaintiff -VersusSAMARENDRA KUMAR BARDHAN ... Defendant BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI August 11, 2017. Mr. Joyak Gupta, Mr.
... Plaintiff Vs. Abhay Singh Surana and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-25-2017
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE G.A. No.113 of 2016 In C.S. No.48 of 2013 Hem Prakash Surana ... Plaintiff -VersusAbhay Singh Surana & Ors. ... Defendants/ Proforma-Defendant BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI August 25, 2017. Mr.
Per the Complainant All the Accused in Criminal Conspiracy Vs. Sewa Si ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
the respondents-accused were charge sheeted, to which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. At conclusion of the complainant's evidence, statements of all the respondents-accused were recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C.Incriminating evidence on record, was put to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free