Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 184,095 results (0.896 seconds)

Glavey Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the provisions of this title." section 4415 of the same title relates to local boards of inspectors and the appointment of local inspectors. section 4400 was amended and enlarged by the act of congress approved august 7, 1882, c. 441, by adding at the end of page 182 u. s. 597 that section these words: "and all ..... to august 7, 1882, it was provided: "all steam vessels navigating any waters of the united states which are common highways of commerce, or open to general or competitive navigation, excepting public vessels of the united states, vessels of other countries, and boats propelled in whole or in part by steam for navigating canals, shall be subject to ..... , d.c. may 15, 1891. mr. john glavey, new page 182 u. s. 600 orleans, la. sir: under the provisions of an act of congress approved august 7, 1882, entitled 'an act to amend section 4440 of title lii of the revised statutes of the united states, concerning the regulation of steam vessels,' you are hereby appointed to serve in .....

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Kentucky

Court : US Supreme Court

..... appeals of kentucky erred in so construing that enactment as to forbid a railroad company from justifying a voluntary disregard of its command by claiming that competition between its road and other modes of transportation created substantially dissimilar circumstances and conditions. it does not call for argument that railroad companies are incorporated ..... the operation of section 218 of the constitution. it is earnestly argued for appellant that the transportation is not under substantially similar circumstances and conditions when competition exists at one point and not in another, and we are referred to numerous decisions of the federal courts so holding. on the other hand, ..... february 14, 1856, there was passed a general act reserving to the state an unlimited power to amend all charters and amendments thereafter granted. laws of kentucky, 1855-1856, c. 148. it is true that an amendment to plaintiff in error's charter was granted by an act passed february 28, 1860, by section 1 of which .....

Minnesota Vs. Northern Securities Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for the construction and completion of the branch of the minneapolis and st. cloud railroad company." "approved march 11, 1879." " an act to amend an act entitled 'an act granting swamp lands to aid the minneapolis and st. cloud railroad company in building branches to connect with the lake superior and mississippi railroad ..... immense quantities of wheat page 184 u. s. 204 and other products are shipped annually from east grand forks, crookston, moorhead, fergus falls, and other competitive points within the state of minnesota, and all on the lines of railway of the said great northern and northern pacific railway companies, hereinafter referred to, to ..... of the state of minnesota, as well as their business success and general prosperity, depend very largely upon maintaining in said state free, open, and unrestricted competition between the railway lines of said great northern and northern pacific railway companies, respectively, within said state." " c." "that it has been the settled policy .....

Connolly Vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... partnerships, or corporations forming pools, trusts, and combines, and prescribing the mode of procedure and rules of evidence in such cases. the act of 1897 amended section one of the act of 1891 so as to read: "if any corporation organized under the laws of this or any other state or country for transacting or ..... to create or carry out restrictions in trade; second, to limit or reduce the production, or increase or reduce the price of merchandise or commodities; third, to prevent competition in manufacture, making, transportation, sale, or purchase of merchandise, produce, or commodities; page 184 u. s. 553 fourth, to fix at any standard or figure ..... production of said articles of merchandise and increasing the market price thereof, and also for the express purpose of unlawfully and contrary to the common law preventing competition in the manufacture, making, transportation, sale, or purchase of said articles of commerce; also for the express purpose of unlawfully and contrary to the common .....

Vicksburg Waterworks Co. Vs. Vicksburg

Court : US Supreme Court

..... within the said period of thirty years to engage in the business of supplying water to the inhabitants of said city in competition with said bullock & company or their assigns, notwithstanding which said act authorizes and permits said city to construct and maintain waterworks for said purpose, if unable to buy the waterworks of said vicksburg ..... the pleadings." mr. justice shiras delivered the opinion of the court. the sole question for our consideration is whether the bill, as originally filed and as amended, presented a federal question. as the party plaintiff and the party defendant were both corporations and citizens of the same state, the circuit court of the united ..... 3d day of july, 1901, dismissing this suit and the bill, and amended and supplemental bill therein, now therefore this court, in pursuance of the second paragraph of the fifth section of the act of congress approved march 3, 1891, and entitled" "an act to establish circuit courts of appeal, and to define and regulate in .....

Bienville Water Supply Co. Vs. Mobile

Court : US Supreme Court

..... judicial inquiry under it. it may be simply declaratory, for courts have often held that it was beyond the power of the legislature, under the guise of an act amending or repealing a charter, to take away the property of the corporation. clearly the question is, in the first instance, presented for the consideration of the legislature, ..... be worth something to the plaintiff to have not only the right of supplying mobile with water, but also the right to exclude others, and thus prevent all competition. that which gives to a government patent for an invention its chief value is not the right to manufacture and sell the thing invented, but the right to ..... which were always deemed odious not only as being in contravention of common right, but as founded in the destruction of trade by the extinguishment of a free and healthy competition. case of the monopolies, 11 rep. 84." "the exclusive right of the appellee to the privilege claimed, in our opinion, cannot be sustained. the general assembly .....

Jenkins Vs. Neff

Court : US Supreme Court

..... provides for equal taxation upon its own state banks, and where it does not require its trust companies, which, it may be conceded, come into a limited competition with the investors in the shares of national banks, to invest their capital in such a way as to necessarily exempt them from taxation upon a portion of their ..... down by this court in its successive opinions. counsel for plaintiffs in error insist that that case is not controlling, and for several reasons: one, because two amendments have been made in the legislation of new york, which it is said give full banking powers to trust companies, save in respect to the power of issuing ..... law (c. 689, laws 1892), and which in terms authorizes trust companies: "11. to exercise the powers conferred on individual banks and bankers by section 55 of this act, subject to the restrictions contained in said section." section 55, referred to, provides: "every bank and individual banker doing business in this state may take, receive, reserve, .....

American School of Magnetic Healing Vs. Mcannulty

Court : US Supreme Court

..... scheme or device for obtaining money through the mails by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, in violation of the act of congress entitled 'an act to amend certain sections of the revised statutes relating to lotteries, and for other purposes, approved september 19, 1900.'" "now therefore by authority ..... . s. 98 for the action of the postmaster and postal department hereinafter mentioned." it was then averred that persons who were prompted by assumed competitive interference with their business complained to the united states post office department at washington that complainants were not engaged in legitimate business, and therefore, on ..... their ills or diseases. complainants further averred that the provisions of the statutes above mentioned are in violation of the fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments to the constitution of the united states, in that they undertake to deprive persons of their property and property rights without due process of law; .....

JoplIn Vs. Southwest Missouri Light Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the case, delivered the opinion of the court. the foundation of the suit is that the ordinances of march, 1899, and the acts and conduct of the city in entering into competition with the complainant (appellee) impair the obligation of the contract impliedly arising from the ordinance of october 7, 1891, and the acceptance thereof ..... the means obtained thereby constructed electrical works, erected poles and wires, established a schedule of rates, and entered into the business of commercial electrical lighting in competition with appellee. the bill alleged that the appellee was the owner of real and personal property within the city, which is assessed by the city for municipal ..... the united states, which provides that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of a contract, and also violated that clause of the fourteenth amendment of that instrument which provides that no state shall deprive any person of property without due process of law. it is by implication from the statute .....

BepIn Chandra Biswas Vs. the Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1904)ILR31Cal452

..... valuation and the amount payable quarterly on account of the rate. then section 168 provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 163 the chairman may at any time amend the assessment book in the circumstances stated. under sub-section (1) of section 170 'the assessment calculated on the valuation for the time being shown in ..... the corporation now profess to have been compelled to keep this valuation and separation of numbers in abeyance by reason of difficulties created by the calcutta municipal act in consequence of the objections filed by two other personas. no notice whatever was given to the plaintiff that any difficulty had arisen in consequence of the ..... corporation.2. an objection which was not taken in the written statement that the notice of suit served upon the corporation under section 634 of the calcutta municipal act was insufficient was, afterwards, rightly as it appears to me, withdrawn.3. the circumstances under which that suit was brought are these: on the 4th .....