Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Sorted by: old Page 3 of about 184,095 results (0.784 seconds)

Champaden Vittil Lakshmi Amma Vs. Kunnummal Pukkott Thottathil Janamaj ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1894)4MLJ183

..... legislature to be presumed therefrom, appear to us to have been duly considered.14. another question which requires to be noticed is whether the amendment act has made any difference. section 54, as since amended, retains the classification but orders passed under that section are defined among orders which have the force of a decree. there is no trace ..... an order under section 54, clause (a), and there is so intention to give an appeal in such case. the code as amended simply restores the law to the footing on which it stood before act x of 1877 was passed and the course of decisions then passed and approved by the legislature, is that followed in i. l. ..... placed was as essential an element of valuation as the subsequent arithmetical computation, by which the fee payable was ascertained, and that section 12 of the court fees act virtually repealed section 36 of the code of civil procedure.8. we must observe here that section 36 of the civil procedure code was not mentioned in the second or .....

Veeramma Vs. Abbiah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1895)ILR18Mad99

..... act ix of 1871 was then framed on a scientific plan, act xv of 1877 reproducing it with certain important amendments. the scheme of the present act consists in dividing the limitation law into four parts and in collecting the preliminary rules into the ..... presidency. in 1842, the indian law commissioners framed a bill embodying a uniform law of limitation for all the courts in british india. with some amendments suggested by sir james colville and sir barnes peacock, act xiv of 1859 was framed on that bill. but the privy council since remarked that it was an inartistically drawn statute, and ..... cal. 910; khetter mohun chuckebutty v. dinabashy shaha i.l.r. 10 cal. 265 here there have been similar decisions with reference to the forest act and the rent act. reference under forest act of i.l.r. 1882 mad. 210 and kullayappa v. lakshmipathi i.l.r. 12 mad. 471 see however in re syed mohidin hussen saheb .....

Dhani Ram Shaha Vs. Bhagirath Shaha and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1895)ILR22Cal692

..... is not at all to blame, the delay being due to the courts below having dismissed the suit on erroneous and insufficient preliminary grounds without going into the merits. the amendment that i would allow cannot, therefore, be said to prejudice the defendants, except in the matter of costs, as to which the order i should make would be that ..... of mohummud zahoor ali khan v. thakooranee rutta koer 11 moo. i.a. 468 their lordships of the privy council allowed an amendment of the plaint, considering that 'a new suit would probably be met by a plea of the act of limitation,' and that 'in the circumstances of the case such a defence is inequitable.' but in the present case the ..... amendment does not involve the inclusion of any new claim or cause of action in the suit.42. in cases like this, i .....

Pittsburgh and Southern Coal Co. Vs. Louisiana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... required no certificate from the state officers, and no such certificate would have been of any benefit or advantage to either party to the transaction; that there was some competition in the trade in coal from alabama, which came by rail, and that very small quantities also came from tennessee; that there was no coal produced in louisiana, ..... , impost, or toll therefor imposed by the said state, and that the above condition, and also all other the conditions and terms contained in the third section of the act, the title whereof is hereinbefore recited, shall be considered, deemed, and taken fundamental conditions and terms upon which the said state is incorporated in the union." mr. justice ..... of any inspection law. page 156 u. s. 594 3. that it was in violation of the fifth amendment to the constitution of the united states. 4. that it was in violation of section 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the united states. 5. that it was in violation of section 8 of article i .....

United States Vs. Union Pacific Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or business of any or either of the others, and it shall not be lawful for the proprietors of any line of telegraph, authorized by this act, or the act amended by this act to refuse, or fail to convey for all persons requiring the transmission of news and messages of like character, on pain of forfeiting to the person ..... company will not transport men or material for the construction or operation of a line of poles and wire or wires or underground or other system of communication in competition with the lines of the telegraph company, party hereto, except at and for the railway company's regular local rates, nor will it furnish for any competing line ..... tended to defeat its operation. the object of that act was not only to promote and secure the interests of the government, but to obtain, for the benefit of the people of the entire country, every advantage in the matter of communication by telegraph which might come from competition between corporations of different states. it was very far .....

United States Vs. Western Union Tel. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... congress may at any time, having due regard for the rights of said companies named herein, add to, alter, amend, or repeal this act." 18. this act was amended by an act approved july 2, 1864, 13 stat. 356, c. 216. the latter act contained additional grants of lands and page 160 u. s. 57 bonds, and by its fifth section provided that only ..... will not transport men or material for the construction or operation of a line of poles and wire or wires or underground or other system of communication in competition with lines of the telegraph company party hereto except at and for the railway company's regular local rates, nor will it furnish for any competing line any ..... the obligations of the railway company to the government of the united states and the public in respect to the telegraphic service required by the act of congress of july 1, 1862, and the amendments thereto." all the telegraph lines and wires covered by the agreement belonging to or used by either party were , for the purposes of the .....

Subbarau Nayudu Vs. Yagana Pantulu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1896)ILR19Mad90

..... limits of its ordinary jurisdiction, and who otherwise are not subject to it. its jurisdiction is excluded until it is specially conferred by the court's own act, and that act must be performed prior to the institution of the suit. the court had therefore no inherent jurisdiction, which makes all the difference between the case here in ..... is just as if a plaint were presented not in proper form or unverified; the court would not act upon it--not because it had no jurisdiction, but because a prerequisite was wanting, which is allowed to be supplied afterwards by amendment. in the present case the court was altogether debarred and precluded from receiving the plaint, as it ..... 1895 during which he was prosecuting his former suit should be excluded in computing the period of limitation for the present suit.2. section 14 of the limitation act allows such exclusion if the former suit was prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of .....

Pearsall Vs. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... any other railroad corporation, or the stock, franchises, or rights of property thereof, having a parallel or competing line. under the broad powers conferred by the amended act of 1865, it is probable that this arrangement might be lawfully made, and the question is whether an unexecuted power to make such arrangement is a "vested right ..... to the legislature at that time that these almost unlimited powers would be used to obtain the control of parallel and competing lines and to stifle legitimate competition, doubtless a proviso would have been inserted to meet this possibility. that the charter of 1865 might be made available to accomplish this purpose became apparent ..... the two systems, to operate 9,000 miles of railway under a single management, and to destroy any possible advantages the public might have through a competition between the two lines. it is true that upon its face the agreement contemplates principally an interchange of traffic between the lines under joint tariffs (by .....

Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Icc

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to anyone, it is to the rival road, which has not adopted corresponding rates; but, as before observed, it was not the design of the act to stifle competition, nor is there any legal injustice in one person's procuring a particular service cheaper than another. . . . if these tickets were withdrawn, the defendant ..... , 1892. the original bill of complaint was brought by the interstate commerce commission, created by virtue of an act of congress, entitled "an act to regulate commerce," approved february 4, 1887, as amended by an act approved february 10, 1891, against the texas and pacific railway company, a corporation chartered and existing under and by ..... is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the bill. mr. justice harlan, with whom concurred mr. justice brown, dissenting. the interstate commerce act, as amended march 2, 1889, requires every common carrier, subject to its provisions, to print and keep open to public inspection schedules showing its rates and charges for .....

Atlantic and Pacific R. Co. Vs. Mingus

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 9 were intended as a limitation upon the power of congress, which might otherwise be inferred from section 8, the power reserved by section 20 to alter, amend, or repeal the act, except so far as its exercise might interfere with the just rights of the company, being the latest expression of the legislative will, may properly be construed ..... contract with the southern pacific, the atlantic and pacific obtained the right to run its own cars to san francisco, and to conduct to that point an independent and competitive freight and passenger business. page 165 u. s. 419 on july 6, 1886, the company had about 1,228 miles of constructed road equipped and in operation, of ..... the right was reserved to congress, "at any time, having due regard for the rights of said atlantic and pacific railroad company," to "add to, alter, amend or repeal this act." the company proceeded with its organization, but up to april 20, 1871, had only been able to construct 75 miles of its road, including 34 miles in the .....