Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 184,054 results (0.725 seconds)

Oct 15 2024 (SC)

Omkar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by the national medical commission before the publication of the admission brochure for the academic year 2025-26.36. in fact, a perusal of the amendment notification dated 13.05.2019 and the guidelines at appendix h-1 would indicate that with regard to some categories of disabilities particularly, locomotor disability, ..... will issue, an inclusive attitude will be taken towards persons with disabilities from all categories furthering the concept of reasonable accommodation recognized in the rpwd act. the approach of the government, instrumentalities of states, regulatory bodies and for that matter even private sector should be, as to how best can ..... be followed by the states parties for empowerment of persons with disabilities. the convention laid down the following principles for empowerment of persons with disabilities, which the act seeks to implement:- (i) respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one s own choices, and independence of persons; (ii) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Miss. Tanmai Aravind Nirna, Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Scie ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms. Bhoomika R Gowda Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Helath Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms Nayana Gowda M Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Shaik Mohammed Afnan Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Deeksha V Jannu Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Dinesh Reddy Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms Pidathala Lakshmi Pranavi Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sci ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Mr Ojas N S Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms. Likitha Saanvi Somisetty Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sci ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //