Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Page 1 of about 184,161 results (0.947 seconds)

Sep 04 2018 (HC)

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

..... made to the cvc. the learned senior counsel appearing for wipl had also referred to section 19(1)(a) of the competition act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the competition amendment act, 2007. the provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry on receipt of a complaint . this was amended by the competition amendment act, 2007 to provide for an inquiry on receipt of information . the explanation provided for the legislative ..... amendment was to the effect that the term information is wider. the notes to clauses of the competition amendment act, 2007 expressly state that the amendment enables the competition commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (HC)

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... concerned to abide by such other orders as the commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; (f) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (g) pass such other [order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. [provided that while passing orders under this section, if the commission ..... of such agreement or ten percent of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the commission; ..... and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. the competition amendment act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of braham dutt (supra). the adjudicatory function of the cci remained unchanged, but several amendments with respect to its procedure were a mismatch to its adjudicatory functions and were more .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1957 (SC)

The State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC699; (1957)59BOMLR945; (1957)35MysLJ(SC)283; [1957]1SCR874

..... 20, 1952, the state of bombay passed the bombay lotteries and prize competitions control and tax (amendment) act (bom. xxx of 1952). this act amended the provisions of the 1948 act in several particulars. thus, the words 'but does not include a prize competition contained in a newspaper printed and published outside the province of bombay', which ..... and gambling under entry 34 as hereinbefore mentioned. by the amending act xxx of 1952 the legislature by deleting the concluding words of the definition of 'prize competition', namely, 'but does not include etc., etc.,' extended the operation of the act to prize competitions carried on in newspapers printed and published outside the state ..... deletion was that the scope and the application of the 1948 act so amended became enlarged and extended so as to cover prize competitions contained in newspapers printed and published outside the state of bombay. after clause (d) of s. 2(1) the amending act inserted a new clause (dd) which defined the word ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2002 (HC)

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

..... while assailing the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions. in the result, we hold that the andhra pradesh motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1995 (amendment act 23 of 1995) and andhra pradesh motor vehicle taxation (amendment) act, 1992 (amendment act 11 of 1992) are constitutionally valid. consequently, we dismiss all the writ petitions with no order as to costs.55. ..... (a) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (4).' the third schedule (see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act) as amended by amendment act 23 of 1995 reads as follows :third schedule[see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3]sl. no.period/class of vehiclemotor cycles including- ..... writ petitions, mandamus was sought to declare section 4(1-a)(a) read with schedule 3 part i of the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 as amended by amendment act no. 27 of 1998, as unconstitutional, violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and inconsistent with scheme of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1948 (PC)

R.A. Coodzer and Company Vs. the Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1948)2MLJ442

..... escape taxation. presumably with the object of obviating such uncertainty in the determination of the nature of such payments, section 10(4)(b) was introduced by the amendment act of 1939.7. the language of that provision is clear, and according to well established canons of construction it is not open to read into the enactment words ..... already pointed out, there is no provision corresponding to section 10(4)(b) of the indian act in any of the english taxing statutes.5. section 10(4)(b) became part of the income-tax act only by the amendment act of 1939. before the introduction of this provision, courts in india were called upon to decide whether ..... permissible deductions. the learned judges did not accept the contention but in doing so, fazl ali, c.j., observed, after dealing with the earlier cases before the amendment and the introduction of this provision, as follows:these decisions, in my opinion, lay down the general principle in correct terms though they are now more or less .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2008 (HC)

Ritu Sengupta and Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT68; 2008(106)DRJ54

..... tax by three, the quotient being added to the amount of property tax which was payable immediately before the coming into force of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003, and to the amount of property tax which shall be payable respectively in each of the remaining two successive years after such addition.(2) where ..... of any new building for which an occupancy certificate has been granted, or which has been occupied, after the coming into force of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003, such payment shall be made, and such return shall be furnished, within thirty days of the expiry of the quarter in which such occupancy certificate ..... 01,552/-. the said refundable amount has been adjusted towards property tax payable for future years. the adjustment is recorded in the order dated 8th february, 2007. learned counsel for the petitioners had stated before the court that adjustment of excess payment paid earlier had been made and the only question that required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1992 (TRI)

V.V. Trans-investments (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (1992)42ITD242(Hyd.)

..... after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960, had to be provided for out of the profits of the financial year or of the previous financial years before declaration of dividend.accordingly, it would follow ..... to section 205(1) makes it clear that the company has to provide for depreciation for any previous financial year or years which falls after the commencement of companies (amendment) act, 1960, before declaring or paying dividend for any financial year. under clause (a) of the first proviso to section 205(1), depreciation for all financial years ..... reads as under :-- if a company has incurred any loss in any financial year or years, which falls or fall after the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 1960, then the amount of loss or an amount which is equal to the amount provided for depreciation for that year or those years whichever is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2016 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Mohan Exports India P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... decision of the itat holding that the value of neither the land nor the building can be included in the net wealth of the assessee, notwithstanding the amendment to section 2 (m) of the wt act, has been accepted by the revenue. 15. in that view of the matter, the assessee is justified in contending that the revenue should not be permitted ..... , was not maintainable. he submitted that as far as ay 1985-86 is concerned, it was governed by section 40 of the finance act 1983 as it stood prior to the amendment to section 2 (m) of the wt act with effect from 1st april 1988. the position as regards ays 1986-87 and 1987-88 was no different. the decisions of the ..... . specific to the issue at hand is the definition of assets for the purposes of section 40(2) of the finance act, 1983 as amended by the finance act, 1988. under section 40(3) (vi) the assets shall include building or land appurtenant thereto, as well as land appurtenant to such building or part . it is inconceivable that while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2008 (TRI)

Comet Handicrafts Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Delhi)124

..... of justice that the matter be set aside to the file of the ao to reprocess the claim of the assessee in the light of the amendment by taxation laws (amendment) act, 2005 as aforesaid.in the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part, in terms as indicated hereinabove. ..... following amendment was made with retrospective effect from 1st april, 1998 : (a) after the proviso, the following provisos shall be inserted ..... merit for disallowance of interest paid to the bank which is deductible under section 36(1)(iii}of the act.8. with regard to computation of deduction under section 80iiiic on account of depb premium, there is an amendment by taxation laws (amendment) act, 2005. which has received the assent of the president of india on 28th dec, 2005. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 1955 (HC)

State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1956Bom1; (1955)57BOMLR288; ILR1955Bom680

..... forwarded to the petitioners at bangalore. the petitioners advertise their crossword prize competition in various publications in various places in india including the state of bombay.the legislature of the state of bombay passed the act, being act 30 of 1952, which amended act 54 of 1948, by which they purported to tax the gross receipts of ..... petitioners no. 2 from the residents of bombay who had submitted entries for the crossword competition, and by this act also the legislature imposed certain restrictions upon ..... ultra vires'.in this case the legislature had already passed act 54 of 1948 which did not deal with prize competitions outside the state. it is only by the amending act 30 of 1952 that prize competitions outside the state were brought within the ambit of the act. we are therefore asked to presume that the legislature when .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //