Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Page 9 of about 140,241 results (0.623 seconds)

Mohinder Kumar Sood Vs. H.P. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982HP78

..... were distributed. the laxity of the commission is evident from their admission that the copy of the hindu marriage act supplied to the candidates did not have the amendments affected by the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976. it is indeed surprising that in a competition for the recruitment of future judicial officers the commission did not even bother to ensure that they were supplied bare ..... acts containing all the amendments up-to-date. the facts speak for themselves and we make no further comments.25. now the .....

G.K. Granites Vs. Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limite

Court : Delhi

..... trade practice has also been alleged), before the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission shall, [on the commencement of the competition (amendment) act, 2009]., stand transferred to the appellate tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the appellate tribunal in accordance with the provisions of the repealed ..... are final orders. therefore, the appropriate remedy for the petitioners would be to file an appeal in terms of the aforesaid provisions of the competition act. it is settled legal proposition that the high court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226/227 of the constitution will not be ..... the alleged monopolistic restrictive or unfair trade practices. relying upon the judgement of the supreme court in saurabh prakash vs. dlf universal ltd. (2007) 1 scc228the competition appellate tribunal, delhi held that in the absence of separate proceedings alleging unfair, monopolistic or restrictive trade practice, an application for compensation under section .....

Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

..... trade practice has also been alleged), before the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission shall, [on the commencement of the competition (amendment) act, 2009]., stand transferred to the appellate tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the appellate tribunal in accordance with the provisions of the repealed ..... are final orders. therefore, the appropriate remedy for the petitioners would be to file an appeal in terms of the aforesaid provisions of the competition act. it is settled legal proposition that the high court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226/227 of the constitution will not be ..... the alleged monopolistic restrictive or unfair trade practices. relying upon the judgement of the supreme court in saurabh prakash vs. dlf universal ltd. (2007) 1 scc228the competition appellate tribunal, delhi held that in the absence of separate proceedings alleging unfair, monopolistic or restrictive trade practice, an application for compensation under section .....

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... court held: learned counsel for the appellants contended that before raising the national and festival holidays from their original number under the parent act to the number of days contemplated by the amending act, the industries or their representatives should have been given an opportunity of a hearing. this argument is wholly untenable. the principles of ..... in the opinion of the tribunal, be just and equitable in the circumstances of the case. 60. we were also referred to section 27(d) of the competition act, 2002, in this behalf which reads as follows: 27. orders by commission after inquiry into agreements or abuse of dominant position. where after inquiry the commission ..... in the area of basic as well as value added telecom services as also making arrangements for protection and promotion of consumer interest and ensuring fair competition, there is a felt need to separate regulatory functions from service providing functions which will be in keeping with the general trend in the world. .....

Califano Vs. Webster

Court : US Supreme Court

..... one constitutional computation formula with another, and make the new formula prospective only. 413 f.supp. 127, reversed. per curiam. under 215 of the social security act, as added, 64 stat. 506, and amended, 42 u.s.c. 415 (1970 ed. and supp. v), old-age insurance benefits are computed on the basis of the wage earner's "average monthly ..... immunized against alterations of this kind. flemming v. nestor, 363 u. s. 603 (1960). congress expressly reserved "[t]he right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision" of the act, 42 u.s.c. 1304, and the fifth amendment "does not forbid . . . statutory changes to have a beginning, and thus to discriminate between the rights of an earlier and later time." ..... insurance amount. this amount is based on an individual's "average monthly wage" as defined in 215(b) of the act, 42 u.s.c. 415(b) (1970 ed. and supp. v). before it was amended in 1972, 215(b) of the act, 42 u.s.c. 415(b), provided in part: ". . . [a]n individual's 'average monthly wage' shall be .....

Jeetay Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)90ITD739(Mum.)

..... officer's requisition for further details, the assessee clarified that since the bonus shares were not sold during the relevant previous year, and in view of amendments in section 55 of the act which provides that the cost of acquisition of bonus shares is required to be taken at nil, 'it is mandatory for the assessee to keep lot ..... will take its meaning from the definition in clause (h) of section 2 of the securities contracts (regulations) act 1956. the period of holding of the bonus shares will be reckoned from the date of allotment of such asset. these amendments will take effect from 1^st april 1996, and will, accordingly, apply to the securities transferred on or after ..... of affairs is contrary to the very scheme of computation of capital gains under the income tax act. our present concern is how to deal with this incongruity.8. one thing which is immediately clear is that in view of the legislative amendment in section 55(2), any bonus shares that the assessee owns as on, or comes to .....

Assam Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... binding on the agricultural income-tax officer.'15. in the case of tata tea ltd. : [1988]173itr18(sc) , the kerala agricultural income-tax (amendment) act, 1980, and the bengal agricultural income-tax (amendment) act, 1980, were under challenge before the supreme court under article 32 of the constitution. the explanation to section 2(a)(2) of the kerala agricultural ..... view of what we have discussed above, it appears to us that although the explanation to section 2(a)(2) of the kerala agricultural income-tax act, 1950, has been deleted by the amendment act of 1980, the result would still be the same, namely, that the kerala state legislature can impose tax only in respect of 60 per cent ..... is the position in respect of the powers of the legislature of the state of west bengal in spite of the amendments made by the said legislature by the amendment act of 1980 and earlier under the amending act of 1979 which was in force only for one year as we have stated before. it is not necessary to strike .....

Sehat Ali Khan and anr. Vs. Abdul Qavi Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All273

..... not apply.' this section was put in the present form by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the indian limitation (amendment) act, 1922 (act 10 of 1922). it appears to me that the amendment of section 29 in the year 1922 was made by the indian legislature, principally, on account of the different interpretations which had been ..... by the course of legislation culminating in the present section 29(2).12. prior to its amendment in 1922 by the indian limitation (amendment) act of that year, sub-section (1) (b) of section 29 of the present act provided that'nothing in this act shall --(b) affect or alter any period of limitation specially prescribed for in a suit ..... period of limitation prescribed were applicable to the determination of the period of limitation prescribed by any special or local law. in the limitation act of 1908 before its amendment and jn the limitation act 15 of 1877 the corresponding provision was as follows: 'when, by any special or local law now or hereafter in force in british .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Warren Tea Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Cal)113

..... of tea processed and manufactured and not out of the profit of growing tea which is subject to agrl. it act outside the scope and purview of the act.34. therefore, sub-section (4b) introduced through amendment under the finance act, 1999, is clarificatory in nature. therefore, its wres with regard to its retrospectivity would not be hit by ..... under section 80hhc, the amount of income not being charged to tax under the act shall in no case be eligible for deduction under the section. the amendment shall be effective retrospectively from the 1st day of april, 1992.' 6. whether the amendment is clarificatory in nature, whether the intent of the legislature expressed in the statute ..... of sub-section (4b), therefore, in order to determine the vires of the amendment, it is necessary to examine the impact of rule 8 r/w section 2(1a) of the act. inasmuch as the retrospectivity can be saved if the amendment is clarificatory, seeking to clarify the intent of the legislature already expressed in the .....

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)45ITD22(Kol.)

..... have been made after april 1, 1988, and have gone to increase the book profits in any year when the provisions of section 115j of the income-tax act were applicable. this amendment will take effect from april 1, 1988, and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 1988-89 and subsequent years. (clause 19)." 42. ..... year. interestingly, the department was aware of this position as can be seen from the memorandum explaining the amendment introduced by the finance act, 1989. at para 9.6 above (see page 191 supra), we have set down the amendment providing for the adjustment of amounts transferred from the book profit to any reserve in computing the book profit. ..... tax system more progressive, a new chapter xiib is proposed to be inserted in the income-tax act. under the proposed amendment, in the case of any company whose total income as computed under the other provisions of the income-tax act in respect of any previous year is less than 30 per cent, of its book profit, the .....