Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Page 12 of about 140,241 results (0.591 seconds)

Vishweshwara C Vs. Registrar(evaluation)

Court : Karnataka

..... connected matters regarding valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme). hence in exercise of the powers conferred under section 35(1) of rguhs act, 1994, amendment to ordinance governing valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme) is notified as below. a. all answer scripts of undergraduate course in ..... the evaluation system with the ensuing march 2021 examinations. therefore, under compelling reasons, the vice- 22 chancellor of the respondent-university having taken note of amended mci regulations introduced the impugned ordinance. having done so, the same was placed before the committee of academic council held on 1.2.2021 which deliberated ..... or wisdom of the policies but only illegality. in directorate of film festivals v. gaurav ashwin jain this court held: [(2007) 4 scc737 para 16]. 33 16 .courts do not and cannot act as appellate authorities examining the correctness, suitability and appropriateness of a policy, nor are courts advisors to the executive on .....

Shashank S. Reddy Vs. Registrar (evaluation)

Court : Karnataka

..... connected matters regarding valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme). hence in exercise of the powers conferred under section 35(1) of rguhs act, 1994, amendment to ordinance governing valuation of answer scripts of mbbs course (rs-3 scheme) is notified as below. a. all answer scripts of undergraduate course in ..... the evaluation system with the ensuing march 2021 examinations. therefore, under compelling reasons, the vice- 22 chancellor of the respondent-university having taken note of amended mci regulations introduced the impugned ordinance. having done so, the same was placed before the committee of academic council held on 1.2.2021 which deliberated ..... or wisdom of the policies but only illegality. in directorate of film festivals v. gaurav ashwin jain this court held: [(2007) 4 scc737 para 16]. 33 16 .courts do not and cannot act as appellate authorities examining the correctness, suitability and appropriateness of a policy, nor are courts advisors to the executive on .....

S.M. Sundaram Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in : (2003)84ITD199(Mad.)

..... the deduction in the assessment of the partner of a firm. it is true that section 80a(3) has been amended by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1989, w.e.f. 1st april, 1989, omitting therefrom section 80t. before the amendment it was clearly provided in section 80a(3) that where in 'computing the total income of a firm, aop or ..... partner, after allowing the deduction under section 80t in computing the total income of a firm, aop or boi.it is pointed out that section 80t was omitted by finance act, 1987, and that in the new scheme of computation of capital gains deduction was inserted by section 48(2). according to learned counsel, the legislature has intentionally removed ..... section 80t till the asst. yr. 1987-88 there was the provisions of section 80a(3) acting as a bar against the deduction under section 80t in the hands of the partner of a firm. according to him, as section 80a(3) was amended w.e.f. 1st april, 1989, omitting therefrom section 80t, the bar against the deduction from .....

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Padam Prakash (Huf)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Delhi)989

..... are unable to avail of the exemption for rollover of capital gains, within the specified time period, through investment in specified assets. 23.2 section 45 of the it act has, therefore, been amended to provide that capital gains arising from the transfer of the capital asset by way of compulsory' acquisition under any law shall be charged to tax in the previous ..... of provisions contained in the first schedule; the following sub-clause (viia) shall be inserted after sub-clause (vii) of clause (24) of section 2 by the finance act, 2006, w.ef. 1st april, 2007. (viia) the profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co-operative society with its members; (viii) omitted by .....

Maya Spinners Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

..... of section 142 and ending with the date on which the assessee furnishes a report of such audit under that sub-section, or (iv) omitted by the direct tax law (amendment) - act, 1987, w.e.f. 1.4.1989 (iva) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the assessing officer received the declaration under sub ..... ld. dr further submitted that no opportunity is provided to be given to the assessee before making a reference to the special auditor under section 142(2a) before amendment of the act. ld. dr further submitted that according to section 153(3) read with explanation 1 the period during which direction to get the accounts audited was extended will ..... 97 even as per cbdt circular. copy of same is filed which reads as under: [2486] amendment of time limit of completion of assessments and reassessments [the finance (no. 2) act, 1996] 49.1 under the existing provisions of income-tax act, the time limit for making an order of assessment is tow years from the end of the .....

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... length of time thereby denying the opportunity to open the lease hold land for auction through a competitive bidding in the larger interest of the state and the public exchequer as conceived under section 8a(4) of the amended act.90. as an epilogue, this court feels it necessary to also observe that during the course ..... others [(2011) 5 scc142 and in the case of commissioner of municipal corporation, simla vs. prem lata sood & others [(2007) 11 scc40. it is reiterated on their part that m.m.d.r. act, 1957 post 2015 amendment, does not contemplate any procedure for denying extension / rejecting the applications for renewal / extension of period of lease, whether ..... (iii) cto to be taken before starting production from state pollution control board. petitioner has failed to comply the above conditions. petitioner violated these conditions since 2007 and for the first time, has taken cto on 24.07.2010 (annexure-a to the counter affidavit). it is further stated that thereafter the petitioner again .....

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... length of time thereby denying the opportunity to open the lease hold land for auction through a competitive bidding in the larger interest of the state and the public exchequer as conceived under section 8a(4) of the amended act.90. as an epilogue, this court feels it necessary to also observe that during the course ..... others [(2011) 5 scc142 and in the case of commissioner of municipal corporation, simla vs. prem lata sood & others [(2007) 11 scc40. it is reiterated on their part that m.m.d.r. act, 1957 post 2015 amendment, does not contemplate any procedure for denying extension / rejecting the applications for renewal / extension of period of lease, whether ..... (iii) cto to be taken before starting production from state pollution control board. petitioner has failed to comply the above conditions. petitioner violated these conditions since 2007 and for the first time, has taken cto on 24.07.2010 (annexure-a to the counter affidavit). it is further stated that thereafter the petitioner again .....

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... length of time thereby denying the opportunity to open the lease hold land for auction through a competitive bidding in the larger interest of the state and the public exchequer as conceived under section 8a(4) of the amended act.90. as an epilogue, this court feels it necessary to also observe that during the course ..... others [(2011) 5 scc142 and in the case of commissioner of municipal corporation, simla vs. prem lata sood & others [(2007) 11 scc40. it is reiterated on their part that m.m.d.r. act, 1957 post 2015 amendment, does not contemplate any procedure for denying extension / rejecting the applications for renewal / extension of period of lease, whether ..... (iii) cto to be taken before starting production from state pollution control board. petitioner has failed to comply the above conditions. petitioner violated these conditions since 2007 and for the first time, has taken cto on 24.07.2010 (annexure-a to the counter affidavit). it is further stated that thereafter the petitioner again .....

United States Vs. Storer Broadcasting Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... stations, upon their presentation of applications conforming to rules 1.361(c) and 1.702, that set out adequate reasons why the rules should be waived or amended. the act, considered as a whole, requires no more. we agree with the contention of the commission that a full hearing, such as is required by 309(b ..... case with particular reference to such factors as the size, extent, and location of areas served, the number of people served, and the extent of other competitive service to the areas in question. the commission, however, will in any event consider that there would be such a concentration of control contrary to the public ..... s. 14 . its authority covers new and rapidly developing fields. congress sought to create regulation for public protection with careful provision to assure fair opportunity for open competition in the use of broadcasting facilities. accordingly, we cannot interpret 309(b) as barring rules that declare a present intent to limit the number of stations consistent with .....

Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1982)3SCC24; [1983]1SCR145a

..... v. r.m.d. chamarbaugwala. : [1957]1scr874 in that case the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the bombay lotteries and prize competition control act, 1952, as amended by bombay act no. xxx of 1952, was challenged on the ground, inter alia, that it infringes the fundamental rights of the promoters of such ..... competitions under article 19(1)(g), to carry on their trade or business and that the restrictions imposed by the said act cannot possibly be supported as reasonable ..... government may commute a sentence of death, for any other punishment provided by the indian penal code.160. with effect from december 18, 1978, the crpc (amendment) act, 1978, inserted new section 433a, which runs as under :433a. restriction on powers of remission or commutation in certain cases-notwithstanding anything contained in section 432, .....