Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Page 1 of about 140,241 results (0.695 seconds)

Nov 13 2019 (SC)

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... act 2008 xiv. the competition act 2002 xv. the companies act 2013 xvi. the cinematograph act 1952 xvii. the income tax act 1961 xviii. the customs act 1962 xix. the administrative tribunals act 1985 xx. the consumer protection act 1986 xxi. the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 xxii. the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 xxiii. the armed forces tribunal act 2007 ..... during the pre- independence era, the number of tribunals has now increased to several dozens. the constitution of india (42nd amendment) act, 1976 provided for setting up of administrative tribunals through article 323a as well as other tribunals under article 323b. these aforementioned ..... law, tax law, company law or environment law, etc. legislative development of tribunalisation :38. in india, the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976 paved way for tribunalisation of the justice dispensation system by introduction of articles 323a and 323b in the constitution. these provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2009 (HC)

B.K. Bhaskar and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore Development Auth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1483; 2009(5)KarLJ337; 2009(2)KCCR1427; 2009(5)AIRKarR36; AIR2009NOC2682;

..... logistic and warehousing society with effect from 14.12.2007. thereafter, it issued a notification dated 26.12.2007 duly published in the karnataka gazette extraordinary at no. 15, dated 4.1.2008 in exercise of the powers conferred by section 18-a of the amended act, notifying the implementation of e-procurement through a ..... zone of consideration, which seriously effected public interest; it is to break the monopoly of vested interests who constituted cartels and rendered competition a farce, and to undo the said mischief, this amendment is brought, which is timely and well intended. but, at the same time, this e-tendering itself should not create another ..... across the department, reduction in the cost of procurement and the much required transparency in the procurement process, processes like reverse auction saving due to increased competition. in order to achieve the said object, it was necessary to create an e-procurement platform that would enable procurement of services as well as work .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2009 (TRI)

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... ceiling, which will compel the msos and cable operators to pass on the financial benefit of the subscribers; and that the growing competition from dth operators will act as a further check to ensure that the benefits are passed on to subscribers by the msos and cable operators. para 3. ..... and pay programme services were not regulated. since 1996, small cable operators were not regulated while others were regulated only subject to effective competition not existing; effective competition was clearly defined. since the year 1999, however, even the commission's authority to regulate the rates of cable programming services was terminated ..... this order shall be called the telecommunication (broadcasting and cable) services (second) tariff (eighth amendment) order, 2007. . 37. the powers and functions of the 1st respondent, the telecom regulatory authority of india, are given in chapter iii of the trai act. section 11(1) (a) refers to the functions of the authority to make recommendations, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2011 (TRI)

Tata Sky Limited Vs. Espn Software India Pvt. Ltd

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... market and that even though the authority itself favors forbearance as the best option. the authority has wrongly prescribed, in the name of lack of effective competition, a ceiling on the rates that can be charged by the msos and lcos from the subscribers. it was alleged that all these stipulations would cause ..... not the one envisaged under section 11 (2) of the act, under which it has issued the impugned order. we finally held as follows:- with these findings, we set aside the telecommunication (broadcasting and cable) services (second) tariff (eighth amendment) order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the telecom regulatory authority of india. we direct the trai ..... not been fulfilled? (c) whether instead of fixing tariffs as stipulated in the trai act, the order is only in the nature of interim order resulting in freezing of prices? (d) whether trai had wrongly concluded that adequate and effective competition in the market is lacking, despite clear evidence of substantial growth? (e) whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 1970 (HC)

Mysore Construction Co. (Prop. Mycon Construction Ltd. Represented by ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2657; (2009)24VST250(Karn); 2009(3)KCCRSN123; 2009(6)AIRKarR141

..... even as understood in some cases by the authorities, as a result of the legislative changes brought about in section 15 of the act, particularly by the amending act [karnataka act no 6 of 2007] in terms of section 4(3)(d) of the act 6 of 2007, where under a new clause - clause [e] has been introduced in sub-section (5) of section 15 of the ..... 2006 with effect from 1.4.2006. here again clause [e] of sub-section [5] of section 15 of the act is the impugned provision inserted by act no. 6 of 2007 but its section 4[3][d] of the amending act no. 6 of 2007 which specifically indicates that the provision shall be deemed to have been inserted from 1st day of april 2006. it ..... is because of the language of section 4[3][d] of act no. 6 of 2007 and the actual contents of section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2018 (HC)

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

..... made to the cvc. the learned senior counsel appearing for wipl had also referred to section 19(1)(a) of the competition act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the competition amendment act, 2007. the provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry on receipt of a complaint . this was amended by the competition amendment act, 2007 to provide for an inquiry on receipt of information . the explanation provided for the legislative ..... amendment was to the effect that the term information is wider. the notes to clauses of the competition amendment act, 2007 expressly state that the amendment enables the competition commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (HC)

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... concerned to abide by such other orders as the commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; (f) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (g) pass such other [order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. [provided that while passing orders under this section, if the commission ..... of such agreement or ten percent of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the commission; ..... and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. the competition amendment act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of braham dutt (supra). the adjudicatory function of the cci remained unchanged, but several amendments with respect to its procedure were a mismatch to its adjudicatory functions and were more .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1957 (SC)

The State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC699; (1957)59BOMLR945; (1957)35MysLJ(SC)283; [1957]1SCR874

..... 20, 1952, the state of bombay passed the bombay lotteries and prize competitions control and tax (amendment) act (bom. xxx of 1952). this act amended the provisions of the 1948 act in several particulars. thus, the words 'but does not include a prize competition contained in a newspaper printed and published outside the province of bombay', which ..... and gambling under entry 34 as hereinbefore mentioned. by the amending act xxx of 1952 the legislature by deleting the concluding words of the definition of 'prize competition', namely, 'but does not include etc., etc.,' extended the operation of the act to prize competitions carried on in newspapers printed and published outside the state ..... deletion was that the scope and the application of the 1948 act so amended became enlarged and extended so as to cover prize competitions contained in newspapers printed and published outside the state of bombay. after clause (d) of s. 2(1) the amending act inserted a new clause (dd) which defined the word ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2002 (HC)

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

..... while assailing the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions. in the result, we hold that the andhra pradesh motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1995 (amendment act 23 of 1995) and andhra pradesh motor vehicle taxation (amendment) act, 1992 (amendment act 11 of 1992) are constitutionally valid. consequently, we dismiss all the writ petitions with no order as to costs.55. ..... (a) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (4).' the third schedule (see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act) as amended by amendment act 23 of 1995 reads as follows :third schedule[see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3]sl. no.period/class of vehiclemotor cycles including- ..... writ petitions, mandamus was sought to declare section 4(1-a)(a) read with schedule 3 part i of the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 as amended by amendment act no. 27 of 1998, as unconstitutional, violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and inconsistent with scheme of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1948 (PC)

R.A. Coodzer and Company Vs. the Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1948)2MLJ442

..... escape taxation. presumably with the object of obviating such uncertainty in the determination of the nature of such payments, section 10(4)(b) was introduced by the amendment act of 1939.7. the language of that provision is clear, and according to well established canons of construction it is not open to read into the enactment words ..... already pointed out, there is no provision corresponding to section 10(4)(b) of the indian act in any of the english taxing statutes.5. section 10(4)(b) became part of the income-tax act only by the amendment act of 1939. before the introduction of this provision, courts in india were called upon to decide whether ..... permissible deductions. the learned judges did not accept the contention but in doing so, fazl ali, c.j., observed, after dealing with the earlier cases before the amendment and the introduction of this provision, as follows:these decisions, in my opinion, lay down the general principle in correct terms though they are now more or less .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //