Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 670 results (0.663 seconds)

Mohinder Kumar Sood Vs. H.P. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982HP78

..... were distributed. the laxity of the commission is evident from their admission that the copy of the hindu marriage act supplied to the candidates did not have the amendments affected by the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976. it is indeed surprising that in a competition for the recruitment of future judicial officers the commission did not even bother to ensure that they were supplied bare ..... acts containing all the amendments up-to-date. the facts speak for themselves and we make no further comments.25. now the .....

Surender Singh Deshta and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ1391HP

..... as annexure p-2.2. in response to such advertisement, a number of candidates, including the three petitioners and respondent no. 4 to 13, appeared in the competitive examination held; by respondent no. 2. pursuant to such written examination, a total of 35 candidates, who were declared successful in the written test, were called for ..... may observe and direct that respondent no. 2 shall take note of the observations made by us above for strict compliance in future for carrying out necessary corrections/amendments in their advertisements, application forms etc. for future selections to the service.26. the record produced by respondent no. 2 in a sealed cover, may be ..... time of compilation of the result after conclusion of viva voce of candidates since they were found to have furnished incorrect information and had suppressed material information. such act on the part of the respondent no. 2 was perfectly legal, valid and in accordance with the relevant rules.8. during the course of hearing, the .....

Krishan Banon Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1999HP87

..... valley development authority for kullu and manali areas was constituted by the government on 2-11-1991. in reply to newly added para 17(a) by way of amendment, it is stated that after considering the views/recommendations of the deputy commissioner, kullu and the director, town andcountry planning in the meeting held on 19-8- ..... plans in manali notified area committee as a matter of practice, though under the municipal act and the bye-laws there is no provision of such authoritiesand steps were taken for providing these authorities in the bye-laws by way of amendment. it is specifically denied that any construction was allowed against the provisions of land-use ..... on in manali town against the municipal act or bye-laws and the allegations of the petitioner in this regard are vague. according to replying respondent no. 2, the petitioner, who himself is an hotelier, is opposing the construction of new hotels in manali town mala fide to avoid healthy competition. it is admitted that the hon'ble .....

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Retired Employees Union Vs. Himach ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC310

..... (conditions of service) amendment act, 1986.' a similar provision which made the amendment by act 35 of 1976 applicable only to those judges who have retired on or after october 1, 1974 was held idtra vires and struck down ..... not be denied the benefit of liberalized pension scheme. their lordships have held as under:at this stage itself, we may note that this amending act 38 of 1986 provided that the amended liberalised pension scheme would apply only to a judge 'who has retired on or after the commencement of the high court and supreme court judges ..... of india : (1983)illj104sc . on the same reasonings and logic we have to hold that amending act 38 of 1986 could not restrict the applicability of the amended provision to only those who have retired on or after the commencement of the amending act. the resultant position would be that the provisions of pension in part i of first schedule as .....

Mehatpur Filling Station and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and or ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2003]133STC101(HP)

..... produce such documents or any defect in the old forms. reference has also been made to the memorandum regarding delegated legislation appended to the bill which preceded the amendment act 11 of 1992 in which it was stated, while referring to clause 8 of the bill as introduced, that it proposes to authorise the state government to prescribe ..... the rules, the same have to be construed as though it meant only to refer to dealers or sales. this consequence also would result from section 2 of the amending act 11 of 1992 providing for omission of the word 'retail' wherever it occurred. further, though the newly introduced provision envisaged and enabled the making of rules on certain ..... 16. the question that requires to be next considered by us is as to what extent the new provisions introduced and brought into effect by virtue of the amending act 11 of 1992 and the existing rules particularly rules 15 and 16 could be enforced and with what consequence. we are concerned in these writ petitions only .....

Ram Lal Vs. Director, Town and Country Planning Department

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009HP69

..... 10.2001 directing the parties to maintain status quo was confirmed by this court on 14.3.1996. subsequently, by virtue of the provisions of the h.p. courts (amendment) act, 2001 the suit stood transferred to the court of district judge, shimla.6. the court below found that the plaintiff had affixed insufficient court fee and hence vide order dated ..... it is not possible to estimate at a money value the subject matter in dispute, and which is not otherwise provided for by this act, the court fee payable is ninety eight rupees which prior to amendment was nineteen rupees and fifty paise.14. to ascertain as to whether the plaintiff's suit falls within the ambit and scope of ..... section 7 or the second schedule, article 13 of the court fee act the pleadings made in the plaint needs to be examined.15. it cannot .....

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Bimla Kanwar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2002)ACC346,II(2002)ACC754,2002ACJ346

..... a given case observed as under:(17) the situation has now undergone a change with the enactment of the motor vehicles act, 1988, as amended by the amendment act, 54 of 1994. the most important change introduced by the amendment insofar as it relates to determination of compensation is the insertion of sections 163-a and 163-b in chapter xi entitled ..... between the parties as also for arriving at the figure of just compensation to which the respondents may be entitled as per provisions of section 168 of the act.35. another reason to allow the prayer made by the respondents is that this is a notification issued by the government notifying the revision of pay scales w ..... kanwar. against the award amount of rs. 7,97,700, all three of them had claimed rs. 20,00,000 in the petition filed by them under the act before the tribunal.3. in this appeal respondents have filed cross-objections for enhancement of compensation by modifying the award. at the same time, an application for additional evidence .....

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation and Others Vs. Region ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the judgment by reasons or to consider the evidence or law for the first time to see if the judgment needs a reversal. 9. section 14-b as amended by act 40/73 w.e.f. 1-11-1973, confers power on the concerned authority to recover damages. where an employer makes default in the payment of any ..... from the employer by way of penalty such damages, not exceeding the amount of arrears as may be specified in the scheme. the section itself, after the 1973 amendment, now provides that before levying and recovering damages, the employer shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. the scheme referred to in s.14-b is ..... of india and others, air 1979 sc 1803, holding:- 11. the bogie of absence of guidelines in the provision and consequential possibility of the authority running berserk or acting hubristically does not frighten. of course, the more bereft of explicit guidelines a statutory power is, the more searching must be the judicial invigilation to discover hidden injustice and .....

Saini and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2000]246ITR762(HP)

..... by the high court of punjab and haryana in sat pal and co. v. excise and taxation commissioner .8. according to the petitioners, by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1989, a proviso came to be inserted in section 44ac. the said proviso read as under :'provided that nothing contained in this clause shall apply to a buyer ..... to the petitioners, the settled legal position was that neither before the amendment act of 1992, the authorities could have deducted tax at source from l-13. licensees under section 44ac of the act nor were they entitled to deduct such tax under section 206c after the amendment of 1992. the view which was taken by the high court of ..... reported in rudra and co. v. union of india , has not properly construed the provisions contained in the explanation to section 206c of the income-tax act, 1961, as amended and had the explanation been properly construed, the conclusion arrived at by the learned judges of the division bench could not have followed. as long as the .....

Saini and Co. Vs. Union of India

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2001]113TAXMAN55(NULL)

..... by the high court of punjab and haryana in sat pal & co. v. excise & taxation commissioner .6. according to the petitioners, by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1989, a proviso came to be inserted in section 44ac. the said proviso read as under:'provided that nothing contained in this clause shall apply to a buyer where the ..... also slps were filed which were dismissed by the supreme court.12. thus, according to the petitioners, the settled legal position was that neither before the amendment act, 1992 the authorities could have deducted tax at source from l-13 licensees under section 44ac nor they were entitled to deduct such tax under section 206c after ..... the decision in rudra & co. v. union of india , has not properly construed the provisions contained in the explanation to section 206c of the income tax act, 1961, as amended and had the explanation been properly construed, the conclusion arrived at by the learned judges of the division bench could not have followed. as long as the .....