Competency - Judgment Search Results

Competent Authority, Entrance Examination Vs. Rajesh Pandita

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ757

Judge passed in OWP No. 692/2002 whereby writ petition filed by Rajesh Pandita has been allowed and the Competent Authority has been directed to admit him against the payment seat which became available during the councelling. LPA

The Additional Chief Administrator-cum-competent Authority Vs. the Add ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995. Not in one but in a series of cases the competence of the officer in the rank of Under Secretary sitting as Revisional Authority over the orders mostly passed

Competent Authority Calcutta, Under Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.10629­10631 OF2014The Competent Authority Calcutta, Under the Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 And Anr. ….Appellant(s) Versus David Mantosh & Ors.

M/S. Competent Automobiles Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5054 OF2008M/S. COMPETENT AUTOMOBILES CO. LTD. ...... APPELLANT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ......RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.5100,5283,5105-5124,5101-5104,5053,5050,5052 all of

M/S. Competent Automobiles Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5054 OF2008M/S. COMPETENT AUTOMOBILES CO. LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. The challenge in this

Competent Authority Vs. Barangore Jute Factory and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN19; RLW2006(1)SC388; 2005(9)SCALE493; (2005)13SCC477

against the judgment of the High Court dated 7th April, 2004. The special leave petitions filed by the Competent Authority are registered as SLP (Civil) No. 16820 of 2004 while those filed by the National Highways Authority

Competent Authority, Ahmedabad Vs. Amritlal Chandmal JaIn and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IVAD(SC)285; AIR1998SC2083; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)899; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)120; 1998CriLJ2920; 1998(2)Crimes316(SC); (1998)3GLR2081; JT1998(3)SC544; 1998(3)SCALE333; (1998)5SCC615;

29, 1993 of a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court and have been filed respectively by the Competent Authority and the State of Gujarat. By this impugned judgment the High Court allowed two writ petitions filed

Competent Authority, Tarana District, UjjaIn (M.P.) Vs. Vijay Gupta an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1991Supp(2)SCC631

but it was filed only after the period of thirty days. This objection petition was rejected by the Competent Authority on the short ground that it was filed beyond the period prescribed under sub-section (3) of Section

Tekchand Vs. Competent Authority.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1993]201ITR658(SC)

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1947 (COFEPOSA), provided the said order has not been revoked or withdrawn by the Competent Authority before the completion of the period prescribed or set aside by a competent court. The third category

The Competent Authority, Delhi vs.manpreet Singh Oberoi

Court: Delhi

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4407/2017 THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ashutosh Nandan Atrey, Advocate. versus MANPREET SINGH OBEROI Through ..... Respondent CORAM: