Compensation - Judgment Search Results

Unemployment Compensation Comm'n Vs. Aragon

Court: US Supreme Court

justify this restricted construction on the ground that the Unemployment Compensation Law is remedial legislation, and any provision limiting benefits under

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Workmen's Compensation Commissione ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1997ACJ1028; [1996(73)FLR1541]; (1996)IILLJ448All

of the Motor Vehicles Act, the authority under the Workmen's Compensation Act has not fixed the liability of the Insurer who

Gopal Synthetics Vs. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and Ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1995ACJ908; [1995(70)FLR72]; (1996)IIILLJ1155Raj; 1994(1)WLC646

of the workman is the only criterion for claiming the compensation and, therefore, the mother of the deceased who filed the

Shivalik Steel and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Workmen's Compensation Commiss ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: I(2000)ACC365,2000ACJ944,[2000(86)FLR406],(2000)ILLJ1456HP

the ESI Act. Bar is against receiving or recovering any compensation or damages under the Workmen's Compensation Act or any other

Douglas MartIn Vs. Workersâandeuro;andtrade; Compensation Board of Al ...

Court: Canada Supreme Court

used in ss. 4(1) and 4(2) further links eligibility for compensation of federal employees to the provincial scheme. Under s. 4(1),

M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.commissioner Employees Compen ...

Court: Delhi

of late Virender Singh and they filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation claiming that late Virender Singh

Sohanbeer Son of Abhay Ram Vs. Workmens Compensation Commissioner/Assi ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2007(2)AWC2108; [2007(113)FLR619]

who had remarried would not be disentitled to receive the compensation. Similar view was held in Veerappan and Anr. v. Muthamma

Obra thermal Power Station, U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Workman C ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998ACJ78; (1997)IILLJ292All; (1997)2UPLBEC914

filing an application on August 6, 1981 he accepted the compensation money deposited by the appellant on the basis of the

Radha Krishan Vs. Compensation Officer, Meja, Allahabad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1954All202

under Section 69 has been taken away and that the Compensation Officer must deposit the amount with the prescribed bank or

Prem Chand Vs. Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Agra and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(2)AWC1192; [2001(89)FLR679]

Act and theRules, it is clear that when anapplication claiming compensation ismoved and if it is not dismissed underRule 24 or