Comparable - Judgment Search Results

Badrunnisa Begum Vs. Mohamooda Begum

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(3)ALD11; 2001(3)ALT243

..... the original although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original now if one goes by this illustration ..... to be treated as secondary evidence unless such copies are again compared with the original the said principle does not apply to ..... to be treated as secondary evidence unless such copies are again compared with the original the requirement of comparison with the original .....

United Dominion Industries, Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pll for a consolidated group differs from their relationship for a conventional corporate taxpayer comparable treatment of pll for the group and the conventional taxpayer can be achieved only if ..... neither method for computing pll on a separatemember basis squares with the notion of comparability as applied to consolidated return regulations on the contrary by expressly and exclusively defining nol .....

Dolat Industries Vs. Krishna Oil Industries

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)3GLR2308

..... 7 learned trial judge scrutinised the documentary evidence on record learned trial judge also microscopically compared both the labels and came to the conclusion that the label of the defendants is ..... it is clear that the exercise undertaken by the trial court is absolutely erroneous to compare both the labels and to draw a subjective conclusion about microscopic dissimilarity 13 learned advocate .....

Finolex Inds. Ltd. and ors. Vs. C.C.E., Pune and C.C.E. (Adj.),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC816

..... new entrance to this field the 10 difference between the comparable goods and value declared by the appellants is reasonable ..... shows that the appellants chinchwad plant have got substantial output compared to the raw material consumption e g during the ..... statutory central excise records maintained by their ratnagiri plant are compared below with the production and clearance reported in their audited .....

Sanjay Goel (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2002CriLJ625

..... of an investigation so as to enable the investigating agency to compare such writing with any words or figures alleged to have ..... handwriting of the appellant according to the learned counsel cannot be compared by any handwriting expect under any direction or order of the ..... be read by the court the court itself is competent to compare the disputed handwriting with the admitted writings of the appellant .....

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Kothari Sugars and Chemicals

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

..... articles in such cases the value shall be based i on the comparable goods produced or manufactured by the assessee or by any other ..... material characteristics of the goods to be assessed and of the comparable goods and ii if the value cannot be determined as above ..... this is not available then only we look for the value of comparable goods manufactured by any other assessee since there were sales of .....

M/S. Ambika Chemicals, Sri M. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)LC158Tri(Chennai)

..... in each of the company as reflected from r g 1 compared to the production book and in such circumstances how the production ..... only when the chemicals were packed he was not prompted to compare the figures of production he also submitted that there were sales ..... sufficient to drop the proceedings 17 we have also seen the comparative statement between the r g 1 register and the production private .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Anoj Kumar Agarwalla

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

..... say that the signatures varied moreover the admitted signature and thumb impression were not even compared by the ao before arriving at a conclusion the learned authorised representative further submitted that ..... civil judges who were empowered to adjudicate the civil dispute between various litigants could not compare the signature with the naked eye and they have necessarily to take the assistance .....

Mckune Vs. Lile

Court: US Supreme Court

..... inmates to sacrifice privileges besides housing as a consequence of nonparticipation the federal program is comparable to the kansas program because it does not offer participants use immunity and because ..... coercive aspects to it berkemer v mccarty 468 u s 420 440 1984 describing the comparatively nonthreatening character of noncustodial detentions emphasis added rather as suggested by the text of .....

ito Vs. Anoj Kumar Agarwalla

Court: Guwahati

..... say that the signatures varied moreover the admitted signature and thumb impression were not even compared by the assessing officer before arriving at a conclusion the learned authorised representative further ..... civil judges who were empowered to adjudicate the civil dispute between various litigants could not compare the signature with the naked eye and they have necessarily to take the assistance .....