Comparable - Judgment Search Results

Schweiker Vs. Hogan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... exception for the categorically needy appellees argue did the 1968 modification potentially change the comparability requirement between the two groups appellees assert that such a change was not intended ..... 1965 1965 senate report footnote 6 the 1965 act contained certain requirements governing the comparative treatment of different beneficiaries under the act it provided that the medical assistance .....

Washington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... requires those championing school integration to surmount a considerably higher hurdle than persons seeking comparable legislative action as in hunter then the community s political mechanisms are modified to ..... obstacle of mandatory referenda imposed by the akron charter amendment it was rather the comparative structural burden placed on the political achievement of minority interests thus in hunter .....

inspecting Assistant Vs. Cosmopolitan Trading Corpn.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (1985)14ITD327(JP.)

..... there is reasonable gross profit in the third account as compared to the first trading account but the profits are understated ..... are in agreement with the learned departmental representative that other comparable cases on gross profit rates or disparity rates will be ..... goods included in the jewellery trading account is much less as compared to the ready goods we therefore presume that sales of .....

Plyler Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... including but not limited to deportation but the children of those illegal entrants are not comparably situated their parents have the ability to conform their conduct to societal norms and ..... not conclusively demonstrate the constitutionality of the state s use of the same classification for comparable purposes at the very least they tend to support the rationality of excluding illegal alien .....

Hutto Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... hart factor led the district court to conclude that respondent s sentence was disproportionate when compared to punishments applicable to other offenses under virginia law 432 f supp at 453 this ..... interest in imposing unusually harsh sentences on habitual offenders to be a substantial one no comparable state interest has been offered to support the punishment inflicted here although it may be .....

V.T. Khanzode and ors. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC917; [1982(44)FLR317]; (1982)ILLJ465SC; 1982(1)SCALE316; (1982)2SCC7; [1982]3SCR411; 1982(1)SLJ466(SC)

..... i which all along had unfair advantage of accelerated promotions as compared with officers in groups ii and iii thus the petitioners ..... groups an officer who was confirmed earlier in one group as compared with another who was confirmed later in another group had ..... committee further held that as certain departments were inordinately large as compared to others this by itself in the context of absence of .....

Merrill Lynch Vs. Curran

Court: US Supreme Court

..... action for damages we assumed that the legislators were familiar with the judicial decisions construing comparable language in title vi of the civil rights act of 1964 as implicitly authorizing a ..... chart that appears in the record of senate committee hearings footnote 2 16 this chart compares features of four proposed bills with the present commodities exchange act it evidently was prepared .....

Enmund Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s at 428 u s 184 footnote omitted i t does not compare with murder which does involve the unjustified taking of human life ..... restrict application of the death penalty to felony murderers who actually kill compare n 9 supra with post at 458 u s 822 n 39 ..... and proportioned to offense id at 217 u s 367 and after comparing weems punishment to the punishments for other crimes the court concluded that .....

Arizona Vs. Maricopa County Med. Soc'y

Court: US Supreme Court

..... already were such significant obstacles to pure competition in the industry that a court must compare the prices that obtain under the maximum fee arrangements with those that would otherwise ..... justice rehnquist join dissenting the medical care plan condemned by the court today is a comparatively new method of providing insured medical services at predetermined maximum costs it involves no coercion .....

P.P. Azeez Vs. Food Inspector

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1982CriLJ1125

..... other person the public analyst or an officer authorised by him should compare the seals on the container and the outer cover with specimen ..... that the seals on the packet and the specimen seal were compared the view taken by this court in subbayyan v state air1963ker330 ..... been regularly performed under rule 7 the public analyst has to compare the seal on the container and the outer cover with the .....