Comparable - Judgment Search Results

Jatindra Nath Biswas Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1975SC1215; (1975)4SCC250; 1975(7)LC466(SC)

..... of 1894 sections 23 24 r v raveendran l s panta jj determination of compensation comparable sales method land under notification dated 16 8 1995 in vicinity to land already acquired ..... referring to 1 sale consideration of a very small piece of land located in a comparatively more developed area of same village 2 distress sale by a co owner having only .....

K.B. Agarwala Vs. Smt. Chandrawati and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1976All15

..... is a primary school and it is not a school recognised by any such board comparable to the divisional board or the state board the school tribunal constituted under section 8 ..... is a primary school and it is not a school recognised by any such board comparable to the divisional board or the state board that being the position it is not .....

United States Vs. Reliable Transfer Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rule requiring liability for such damage to be allocated among the parties proportionately to the comparative degree of their fault and to be allocated equally only when the parties are equally ..... the divided damages rule has been said to be justified by the difficulty of determining comparative degrees of negligence when both parties are concededly guilty of contributing fault the max morris .....

Mookken Devassy Ouseph and Sons Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1975]36STC501(Ker)

..... sell the packing materials or whether the packing materials which were comparatively of insignificant value were used only as a convenient vehicle ..... contained in them therefore they had only an insignificant value compared to the value of the articles contained in them the ..... on the basis that the value of the containers was insignificant compared to their contents when that is the nature of the .....

Mookken Devassy Ouseph and Sons Vs. State of KeralA.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(Ker)48

..... sell the packing materials or whether the packing materials which were comparatively of insignificant value were used only as a convenient vehicle ..... contained in them therefore they had only an insignificant value compared to the value of the articles contained in them the ..... on the basis that the value of the containers was insignificant compared to their contents when that is the nature of the .....

Albemarle Paper Co. Vs. Moody

Court: US Supreme Court

..... lines of progression for which the two tests are apparently now required 2 it compared test scores with subjective supervisorial rankings affording no means of knowing what job performance criteria ..... the study s checkered results appear to compel the opposite conclusion 2 the study compared test scores with subjective supervisorial rankings while they allow the use of supervisorial rankings in .....

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj NaraIn and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1975SC2299; 1975(Supp)SCC1; [1976]2SCR347

..... of the parties to the dispute in a more advantageous position compared to others but that is inevitable in most of the amendments ..... the appurtenances of office or distinctions achieved are in my opinion comparable to such personal advantages in so far as they are not ..... in human history while on the whole the economic level is comparatively high in the united states the difference between the wealth of .....

iqbal Ahmed Vs. Ketki Devi

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1976CriLJ244

..... court to have been written or made by that person may be compared with the one which is to be proved although that signature ..... any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures ..... modifications to finger impressions 4 finger prints by implication are to be compared with a disputed finger print with the help of the expert i .....

imbler Vs. Pachtman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s finding that costello s recantation of his identification lacked credibility compared to the original identification itself id at 562 387 p 2d ..... associated with the judicial process but only a good faith defense comparable to the policeman s footnote 31 see pierson v ray ..... v parman supra watts v gerking supra it is the functional comparability of their judgments to those of the judge that has .....

Schlesinger Vs. Ballard

Court: US Supreme Court

..... want of promotion footnote 2 he claimed that the application of 6382 to him when compared with the treatment of women officers subject to 6401 was an unconstitutional discrimination based ..... in competing for promotion female lieutenants will not generally have compiled records of seagoing service comparable to those of male lieutenants in enacting and retaining 6401 congress may thus quite rationally .....