Company Act - Judgment Search Results
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Incorporated Under the Indian Com ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-22-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ARBLR457(Bom); 2007(5)BomCR271; 2007(4)MhLj27
exploration, and in the development, production and treatment of oil and natural gas. The Respondent (DIK) is a Company incorporated under the Companies' Act, 1956 and carries on the business of the manufacture and supply of chemicals.
Quadricon Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 19 ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-17-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)BomCR345; 2009(4)BomLR1432
of leave under Clause 12 it can be said that the suit was not instituted in accordance with law and thus, the learned Counsel tried to make out a distinction between a de facto institution of the … is an admitted position on record, while this appeal was being heard, that part of the cause of action has arisen in Mumbai and part of the cause of action arose outside Mumbai. Before the learned single
Marico Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-20-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Bom111; 2008(3)BomCR659; (2008)110BOMLR638; 2008(37)PTC109(Bom)
Chancery Division, Page 899. c) Wander Ltd. and Anr. v. Antox India P. Ltd. . d) Kemp & Company and Anr. v. Prima Plastics Ltd., : 1999(1)BomCR239 . e) Polar Industries Ltd. v. Usha International Ltd. and … was rejected some time in the year 2004. 2. In the month of September, 2006, the cause of action arose, when the Plaintiffs learnt about the use by the Respondents-Defendants of the impugned caps for which they
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manganese Ore (India) Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-02-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)BomCR152
Mr.Markanda, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant, submitted that there were nine errors of law apparent on the face of the said interim award.FIRST GROUND8. The first ground of challenge was that the … against the order of the learned single Judge admitting the Appellant's Petition under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for setting aside an interim award of the learned sole Arbitrator only to consider the issue of
Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Companies Act V ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-05-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR418; 2007(4)ARBLR385(Bom); 2007(4)MhLj230
pertaining to the second shipment is beyond the scope of the reference and is ab initio bad in law. Reliance is sought to be placed in the decision in the matter of Rajinder Krishan Khanna and Ors. … 122 of 1998. By the impugned order, the appellants' petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter called as 'the said Act', has been dismissed. The challenge in the matter is three-fold. Firstly,
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. t ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-16-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR587; 2009(111)BomLR2048
Mumbai. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, by virtue of a scheme presented in the Court was amalgamated with the Company known as Gesco Corporation Ltd. and by an order dated 24th October, 2001 the merger was allowed. Gesco … pertinent questions of law arise for consideration in this Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' ). On behalf of the Applicant, it is contended that
Modi Fibres Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 19 ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-03-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR547; 2009(111)BomLR3154; [2009]151CompCas181(Bom); [2009]94SCL102(Bom)
the Indian Companies Act, 1956 takes exception to the Judgment and order passed by the Member of the Company Law Board (Principal Bench, New Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as CLB) dated 16/4/2009 in Company Application No. 255/2008
Saga Department Stores Limited a Company Duly Incorporated Under the C ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-10-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)ALLMR565; 2008(6)BomCR59; (2008)110BOMLR2370
can be made to the judgment of this Court in the case of Indradhanush TV Pvt. Ltd. v. National Film Development Corporation Ltd. (S. No. 232/2004) decided today itself where the Court after discussing and applying the … to enlarge or abridge the time appointed by these rules or fixed by any order for doing any act or taking any proceedings, upon such terms (if any) as the justice of the case may require, and
In Re: Reliance Communications Limited, a Company Incorporated Under t ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-18-2009
Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR3340; [2009]94SCL219(Bom)
to obtain sanction of this Hon'ble Court to the Scheme of Arrangement between Reliance Communications Ltd. (Petitioner in Company Petition No. 487/2009 - hereinafter referred to as the 'Demerged Company') and Reliance Infratel Ltd. (Petitioner in Company … in the Resulting Company with effect from the appointed date in terms of the Scheme without any further act or deed pursuant to Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. The Demerged Company was incorporated under the
The Brihan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate, a Company Incorporated Under t ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-21-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR739; 2006(2)BomCR103; 2006(1)MhLj344; 2006(33)PTC188(Bom)
of. Exhibit 12A was given to me. He contended that Exhibit 12A which shows different labels of different companies regarding liquor made from Santra and Orange and contended that since oranges are of orange colour, all the … Judge, Palghar, complaining of infringement of the Copy Right or infringement of rights conferred under The Copy Right Act, 1957, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'). With reference to Section 62 of the said Act, dispute
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free