Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 133 amendment of other enactment Page 1 of about 11,147 results (0.822 seconds)

Mar 23 2007 (HC)

Mineria Nacional Limitada, a Partnership Firm and Shri Anil Vasudeva S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR789

..... this court on 16-1-2006. 5. section 10f deals with an appeal against the order of company law board, and, provides that any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the company law board made before the commencement of the companies(second amendment act, 2002) may file an appeal to the high court within sixty days from the date of ..... communication of the decision or order of the company law board to him on any question of law arising out of such ..... the full bench. the learned full bench by its decision dated 4-10-2006 held that an appeal from a decision or order of the company law board, filed under section 10f of the act is required to be entertained and disposed of by a single judge and not by the division bench. the apex court in stridewell leathers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2006 (HC)

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

..... functions of the central government under this act or any other law as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 by the central government, by notification in the ..... the notification in the official gazette, constitute a board to be called the board of company law administration.(1 a) the company law board shall exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 by or under this act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 1956 (HC)

Burma Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Commerc ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1957Cal395,61CWN195,[1957]8STC142(Cal)

..... of the bengal motor spirit sales taxation (second amendment) act 1954, motor spirit for aviation purposes is taxable without any distinction as to whether the aircraft 13 operating within indian territory or proceeding beyond indian territorial limits.3. on or about the 9th october, 1054, the petitioner company wrote a letter to the commissioner of ..... second amendment) act, 1954, irrespective of whether the aircraft supplied are operating within indian territory or are proceeding beyond indian territorial limits. it was further intimated that article 286 of the constitution was not considered as a bar to the levy of such a tax.4. subsequent to the said correspondence, the petitioner company ..... section 4(4), sale of motor spirit for the purpose of aviation had been excluded. by virtue of an amendment introduced by section 2 of the the bengal motor spirit sales taxation (second amendment) act, (act xxxii of 1954) the tax can now be levied in respect of motor spirit for the purposes of aviation. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1980 (SC)

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. Surendra Nath Bhattacharya and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1316; (1980)3SCC237; [1980]3SCR783

..... such acquisitions in which property has vested absolutely in government either under section 16 or section 17(1). secondly section 7 of the amendment act provides that where acquisition has been made for a company before july 20, 1962 or purported to have been made under clause (a) or clause (b) of section 40(1) and those clauses do ..... acquisitions of private lands for purposes of a private company provided the conditions laid down in section 7 were fulfilled. this amendment was also challenged before this court in what is known as the ''second arora case : [1964]6scr784 where this court by majority of 4:1 held that the amending act was valid and that under section 40(aa) an ..... acquisition could be made even for a private company if it was engaged in an industry which was for a public purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2008 (HC)

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

..... as under:483. appeals from orders - appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the court shall lie to the same court to which, in the same manner in which, and subject to the same conditions under which, appeals ..... before a division bench of the high court from a judgment of the single judge deciding a matter in a second appeal. by the amending act of 1999, the earlier section 100a was substituted. section 100a as introduced by amending act 46 of 1999, though attained the assent of the president on 30th december 1999, it was not enforced because ..... an appellate decree which is passed by the high court itself. under section 102 of the code which was also amended by the code of civil procedure amendment act, 2002 with effect from 1st july, 2002, no second appeal would be maintainable from any decree when the subject-matter of the original suit is for recovery of money not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2005 (HC)

Gopalakrishnan Vs. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas698(Ker); 2005(3)KLT957; [2006]68SCL484(Ker)

..... up, life of a company is put to an end. therefore, winding up of a company can be ordered only very cautiously and carefully. a company can be ordered to be wound up if it is unable to ..... demand under his hand requiring the company to pay the sum so due and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum, or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor;(rupees five hundred mentioned in the above section was amended as rs. one lakh by the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 (act 11 of 2003).'3. by winding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2006 (SC)

Kamal Kumar Dutta and anr. Vs. Ruby General Hospital Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas678(SC); (2006)5CompLJ511(SC); JT2006(7)SC333; 2006(7)SCALE668; [2006]70SCL222(SC)

..... as under :483. appeals from orders.- appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the companies(second amendment) act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the court shall lie to the same court to which, in the same manner in which, and subject to the same conditions under ..... of second hand medical equipments supplied by the appellant no. 1 which was reversed by the respondent no. 2 ..... sheet for the year ended 31.3.1997 wherein capitalization of second hand medical equipments supplied by the appellant no. 1 was reversed. then the appellants filed application under sections 397 & 398 of the act before the clb. the clb directed the respondent company to amend audited balance sheet as at 31.3.1998 and restore capitalization .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2012 (SC)

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

..... be read progressively, in its context, going from section 60b(1) all the way to section 60b(9).*section 60b whether for listed public companies or other companies was introduced in the companies act, for a specific purpose under the companies (second amendment) act, 2002. it was never designed to create an island of regulatory standards that are distinct from and contrary to the spirit of various other ..... duty is cast on it to get its securities listed on a recognized stock exchange. section 60b, as already indicated, refers to im. section 2(19b) was inserted by the companies (second amendment) act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:2(19b) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a prospectus by which a demand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... on a question of law. in this context the word any would mean all section 10f of the act uses identical language and provides that any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the company law board made before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 may file an appeal to the high court within sixty days from the date of communication of ..... may be conferred on it, before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 by or under this act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers and functions of the central government under this act or any other law as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 by the central government, by notification in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2009 (HC)

Smt. Hetal Alpesh Muchhala Vs. Adityesh Educational Institute and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas75(Bom)

..... further period of thirty days, but not thereafter.section 10f of the companies act, 1956:10f. appeals against the order of the company law board.--any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the company law board (made before the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002) may file an appeal to the high court within sixty ..... days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the company law board to him on any question of law ..... for its contempt.24. thereafter, based on the recommendations made by sachar committee, by the companies (amendment) act, 1988 (with effect from may 31, 1991), the provisions of section 10e were once again amended and section 10f of the companies act, 1956, was inserted.25. paragraphs 16.8 and 16.11 of the recommendations made by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //