Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 133 amendment of other enactment Court: chennai Page 1 of about 297 results (0.243 seconds)

S. Pattabhiraman Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2009]148CompCas705(Mad); [2009]96SCL305(Mad)

..... of any of the members of a company can either call for or direct for a general meeting ..... which penalty is imposed under section 168 of the act, certainly stands on a different footing on the factual circumstances of the case. under section 166 of the act, convening of annual general meeting is a mandatory duty cast on every company. under section 167 of the companies act, as amended by the companies (second amendment) act, 2002 see [2003] 113 comp cas 201, the central government on the application .....

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

..... . (vi) the historical developments that had taken place ever since the enactment of state financial corporations act, 1951, through the companies act, 1956, sica 1985 rddb act, 1993, companies (second amendment) act, 2002, securitisation act, 2002, sica (repeal) act, 2003 and the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws (amendment) act, 2004 clearly indicate that there could be only one intention behind the insertion of the third proviso under section ..... and the third in the year 2004 in the form of enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws (amendment) act, 2004. companies (second amendment) act 25. first let us take note of what led to the companies (second amendment) act, 2002. in the year 1999, the government constituted a committee under the chairmanship of justice v.balakrishna eradi, a retired judge of the supreme court, to review the .....

R.M. Veerabhadra thevar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1973]92ITR357(Mad)

..... was not taken over by the company. we do not propose to express any opinion on the correctness of that view, for, in our judgment, by virtue of the amendment made in section 10(2)(vii), proviso (ii), of the indian income-tax act, 1922, by section 11 of the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949 (67 of 1949), even ..... under a 'realisation sale' excess over the written down value not exceeding the difference between the original cost and the written down value is liable to be brought to tax.'12. whether the assessee was carrying on any business on the 1st and 2nd april, 1959--the finding of ..... found as a fact that the assessee carried on business for a part of the previous year ending march 31, 1960, that the assessee had plied buses on 1st and 2nd april, 1959, and, therefore, the income of rs. 223 was assessable as income from business in the assessment year 1960-61, we are of the view that this .....

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... , associate professor of commerce, government arts college, nandanam. this court had the benefit of hearing them also. according to them, as per section 388-e of the act, which was introduced by means of companies (second amendment) act, 2002, the ".tribunal". alone is competent to make a recommendation to the central government for removal of a director.8. i have considered the above submissions.9 ..... court, wherein, a same view was taken. further, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, chapter iv a was never notified as required under the companies (second amendment) act, 2002. therefore, according to him, it is only ".company law board"., which has got power to make recommendation and on whose recommendation, a director can be removed.7. today, four experts in the said subject .....

Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)

..... 434. under sub-clause (a) of section 434(1), if a creditor, by assignment or otherwise, to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding rupees one lakh (substituted for rs. 500 by companies (second amendment) act, 2002) then due, has served on the company, by, causing it to be delivered at its registered office, by registered post or otherwise, a demand under his hand ..... requiring the company to pay the sum so due and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum, or to .....

New Bridge Holdings B.V. Vs. Ttk-lig Limited and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... , or carries on business or personally works for gain. [provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply on and after the commencement of the companies (second amendment) act, 2002.] 11. section 10 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 confers a power on the high court to punish contempts of subordinate courts. by that provision, every high court shall have and exercise the ..... 24.12.97. by virtue of the proviso inserted by the companies (second amendment) act, 2002, the said provision shall not apply on and after the commencement of the said amendment act. the amendment act came into force with effect from 13.12.2002. hence, the reliance placed by the respondents over the power of the company law board to enforce its order in terms of section 634a instead .....

Shree Mahabaleswara Auto Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Repre ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2012(7)MLJ805

..... to the national company law tribunal had not been given effect to at all and therefore, the provisions contemplated therein have not come ..... petitioner would argue that the qualification prescribed for the judicial member of company law board being only ten years, it is below the standard and hence the same need to be quashed. 20. it is to be pointed out that the companies (second amendment) act, 2002, which was to take effect from 1.4.2003 with reference ..... of india on 13th january, 2002 and became the companies (amendment) act, 2002. 19. this bill provides for setting up of the national company law tribunal (nclt) and on setting up of the said tribunal, all the matters relating to companies which were earlier handled by various high courts, company law board, board for industrial and financial reconstruction ( .....

Thiru. R. Gandhi President, Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004]120CompCas510(Mad); (2004)2CompLJ274(Mad); 2004(2)CTC561; [2004]52SCL79(Mad)

..... in the country, has, in this petition, questioned the constitutional validity of the amendment effected to the companies act by companies (second amendment) act, 2002 whereby provision is made for setting up of a national company law tribunal (tribunal) as also a national company law appellate tribunal, and to which tribunal, the jurisdiction exercised by the high ..... court for nine decades in relation to, inter alia, amalgamation and reconstruction of companies, winding up, ..... of the constitution of india. the said entry was originally a part of entry 3 of list ii. by reason of the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976 and by section 57(a)(vi) thereof, it was inserted into list iii as item 11-a'. 26. the three judge bench .....

P. Suresh and Another Vs. State through by the Inspector of Police, Vi ...

Court : Chennai

..... body prior to 31.05.2007 (inclusive) for calculation of i and a charges. (e) in the meantime, the tamil nadu town and country planning (second amendment) act, 2007 and the tamil nadu town and country planing (levy of infrastructure and amenities charges) rules, 2008 were challenged before this court, in writ petition in ..... as follows: (a) the first petitioner / a3 is the managing director of m/s.arun excello infrastructure private limited. the second petitioner / a4 is the director of the said company. the said company belongs to the petitioners herein, engaged in property development and connected activities. the petitioners have purchased the properties in, inter-alia s ..... buildingrs.500/- per sq.m.2multistoreyed buildingrs.1000/- per sq.m.3institutionsrs.200/- per sq.m.4industrial users.300/- per sq.m.17. the petitioners' company applied for additional construction of 1,17,940 sq.m. on 18.03.2008. the commissioner of town and country planning, chennai, granted approval/permission on .....

K.S. Sundaram Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary, Departm ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(4)CTC715; (2004)1MLJ440; [2004]51SCL169(Mad)

..... procedure therefor was felt cumbersome and, therefore, section 269 of the companies act was extensively amended. subsection (1) of section 269 provides that on the commencement of the amendment act 1988, every public company, or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, having a paid-up share capital of a particular level would have ..... aforesaid partnership firm against item no. 7 in form 25-a and this amounted to a misstatement, punishable under section 628 of the companies act. by way of second reason, it was stated that the managing director had misused his fiduciary capacity in respect of the contracts with m/s. tambraparani enterprises ..... 1987 and 1988 (being the four financial years immediately precedirig the 'preceding financial year'). ... ... ...'from this the learned counsel says that, relying on the second illustration, since the profit was adequate in the year 1986, there would be no application of schedule xiii.18. we fail to follow the argument because even .....