Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 133 amendment of other enactment Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 17 results (0.082 seconds)

Sep 29 1977 (HC)

Chamaru Etc. Vs. Khazan Singh Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978HP58

..... on a high court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces.' subsequently, the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976 was enacted, and section 40 thereof, which was brought into force from feb. 1, 1977, substituted the existing clause (1) by the following clause ..... , before one of us, a question was raised whether the addition of clause (5) in article 227 of the constitution by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act had resulted in depriving this court of its jurisdiction to interfere judicially in respect of judgments and orders of inferior courts. the case was referred to ..... open to appeal or revision.22. accordingly, we hold:(1) article 227 as amended by the constitution (forty-second) amendment act, 1976 does not govern petitions filed under article 227 before feb. 1, 1977. (2) article 227, even after its amendment, continues to confer on a high court the power of judicial superintendence over a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1992 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kavita Rani and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(1993)ACC606,1993ACJ489

..... no more res integra. the provision of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act, as it stood prior to the amendment act no. 56 of 1969, was judicially interpreted. it was held that the liability undertaken by the insurance company with regard to the death of or bodily injury to a third party, caused by or arising out of ..... thousand' in clause (b) aforementioned were substituted with words 'fifty thousand'.12. by virtue of section 54 of the amendment act no. 56 of 1969, which came into force on and from 2nd march, 1970, clause (b) was substantially amended and it stood after amendment as under:95. requirements of policies and limits of liability.-(1)xxx xxx xxx(2) subject to the proviso to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2010 (HC)

Kashmir Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... against him, which read as under:registeredno. 15706.h.p. forest department.dated hamirpur the, 1-3-07.notice: under section 52 of indian forest act, 1927 (read with himachal pradesh second amendment) act, 1991.from:authorised officer-cumdivisional forest officer,hamirpur, h.p.to:shri kashmir singh s/o shri sarwan singh,r/o dhamani po ropri tehsil barsardistt. ..... and the rules framed there under as such the forest produce seized along with jeep is liable to be confiscated under section 52-a of indian forest act 1927 (himachal pradesh second amendment) act, 1991.now before passing such order, an opportunity is given to you to show cause why jeep no. hp-21/9300 involved in this case ..... the person from whom it was seized as may be specified in such order.6. a bare reading of the above amended provision insofar as confiscation of a vehicle under section 52(a) of the indian forest act, makes it clear that the prosecution is required to satisfy two conditions; (i) there must be notice in writing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2003 (HC)

Chaudhary Ram Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2856

..... forest produce and the circumstances under which the vehicle will not be confiscated, are contained in section 52-b of the indian forest act as inserted vide section 5 of the indian forest (himachal pradesh second amendment) act, 1991 which reads as follows :'52-b. issue of show cause notice before confiscation under section 52-a.-- (1) no order ..... against such use.'5. a bare reading of the aforesaid provisions, insofar as confiscation of a vehicle under section 52-a of the indian forest act inserted by section 5 of the aforesaid amending act is concerned, makes it clear that two conditions must be satisfied to confiscate the vehicle. such conditions are : (i) a notice in writing ..... the petitioner had no knowledge that the vehicle in question was likely to be used for carrying forest produce in contravention of the provisions of the forest act or that he had connived in such use of his truck. the conclusions to the contrary arrived at by the learned sessions judge and the authorised officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1958 (HC)

Dr. Y.S. Parmar Vs. Hira Singh Pal and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... given before the representatoin of the people act, 1951, was amended by act 27 of 1956. as a result of the amendment, section 123 has been materially changed. section 123(7) of the amended act has taken the place of section 123(8) of the old act, i.e. before amendment. two new explanations have also been added by the amendment act. the second explanation runs as follows :'for the purpose ..... of clause (7), a person shall be deemed to assist in the furtherance of the prospects of a candidate's election if he acts as an election agent, or a polling agent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1952 (HC)

Chamba Valley Transport Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1953HP8

..... therefore that the himachal pradesh administration stopped the petitioner's business because it had decided to nationalise transport. now, prior to the amendment, amongst others, of the restriction clause (6) of article 19 by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, it would have been within the scope of judicial review as to whether a restriction on the exercise of the ..... therefore seeking to enforce the right for itself and not for anybody else, and it makes no difference that it is an incorporated company. -- 'charanjitlal v. union of india', 1950 s. c. b. 869.12. coming to the second point, the respondent's notice dated 10-9-1949 which compelled the petitioner to stop carrying on its business was as follows: 'from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2007 (HC)

Parenteral Drugs India Limited and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC435

..... 2nd class such as barren/uncultivable land in order to protect the interest of farmers in particular and state in general from reducing the area of cultivable land for the purpose of stamp duty and registration fee under section 47-a indian stamps (himachal amendment) act, 1988 and the deficient amount if any be recovered from the respondent company ..... j.1. the brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner no. 1 is company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956. the petitioners no. 2 and 3 are group of companies of the petitioner no. 1. the respondent-state had floated several schemes in the year 2001-02 attracting industrialists ..... of the state as per section 118 of the h.p. tenancy and land reforms act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act). they moved an application in accordance with law and the necessary permission was granted to the petitioners companies on 20.7.2004. they executed seven sale deeds on 20.7.2004. it will .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2004 (HC)

In Re: Gontermann-piepers (India) Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2005]57SCL225(HP)

..... ., etc. in the present case, the modified scheme of arrangement applied for sanction of this court under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act by the petitioners-companies for demerger of the textile division of 1st petitioner-company to 2nd petitioner-company would amount to transferring the properties, assets, liabilities and all rights and claims whatsoever of the objectors sbi and iibi who are respective ..... in issue before their lordships was in respect to the interpretation of the word 'suit' and 'proceedings' as used in u.p. public moneys (recovery of dues) act, 1972 and sections 22(1) (as amended in 1994), 3(1 )(o) and 17(3) of the sica. their lordships have held that there is an apparent distinction between the expressions 'proceedings' and 'suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1996 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Khem Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1997ACJ926

..... protracted litigation, provisions of section 163-a and section 163-b have been incorporated by the amendment act of 1994. the structured formula for payment of compensation under section 163-a contained in the second schedule inserted by motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994 has already been added to the act, however, it may be clarified that for the determination of the controversy involved in the present ..... principles of state policy, the poverty of the ordinary run of victims of automobile accidents, the compulsory nature of the insurance of motor vehicles and nationalisation of the general insurance companies and bus transport. this view was again reiterated by the apex court in state of haryana v. darshana devi 1979 acj 205 (sc), wherein again krishna iyer, j. recommended that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2008 (HC)

Smt. Kamla Devi Vs. Ram Kishan and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ2563,2008(1)ShimLC437

..... of any other person.(3) the central government may, keeping in view the cost of living by notification in the official gazette, from time to time amend the second schedule].163-b. option to file claim in certain cases.--where a person is entitled to claim compensation under section 140 and section 163-a, he shall ..... after another or simultaneously under both provisions. the compensation payable under section 140 of the act having been paid to the claimants and that option having been exhausted, the respondent no. 2, insurance company is justified in opposing the application for amendment to permit the appellant to convert the original claim petition to be as one under section ..... be liable to pay in the case of death or permanent disablement due to accident arising out of the use of motor vehicle, compensation, as indicated in the second schedule, to the legal heirs or the victim, as the case may be.explanation.--for the purposes of this sub-section, 'permanent disability' shall have the same .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //