Court : Karnataka
1 Reserved on :18. 07.2024 R Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.13943 OF2024(GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. R.GOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT68YEARS S/O RAMAREDDY K., RESIDING AT NO.62 SWAPNA SADANA5H A CROSS, 16TH MAIN NEAR METROPOLITAN CLUB BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU 560 076. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI PRABHULING K.NAVADGI, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SANJEEVINI NAVADGI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . MR. MOHAMMED MUKARAM POLICE INSPECTOR AGED ABOUT45YEARS BY CCB POLICE, N.T.PETE BENGALURU CITY2REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI THEJESH P., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:35389 CRL.P No.8341 of 2018 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8341 OF2018BETWEEN:1. M/S ZIM LABORATORIES LTD., B-21/22, MIDC AREA, KALMESHWAR-441501 DISTRICT NAGPUR, MAHARASHTRA. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. ANWAR SIRAJ DAUD AND CHAIRMAN, ZAKIRABHAI SULEHBHAI VALI2 MR. ZAKIRBHAI SALEHBHAI VALI, AGED ABOUT76YEARS, S/O MR.SALEHBHAI ABDULALI VALI, CHAIRMAN OF M/S ZIM LABORATIORIES LTD., B-21/22, MIDC AREA, KALMESHWAR-44 1501. DISTRICT NAGPUR, MAHARASHTRA.3. MR. ANWAR SIRAJ DAUD AGED ABOUT55YEARS, S/O MR. SIRAJ MEHFUZ DAUD, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S ZIM LABORATORIES LTD., B-21/22, MIDC AREA, KALMESHWAR-441 501. DISTRICT NAGPUR, MAHARASHTRA.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:35389 CRL.P No.8341 of 2018 4. MR. RIYAZ AHMED KIKABHAI KAMAL AGED ABOUT64YEARS, S/O MR. KIKABHAI TAHERALI KAMAL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF M/S ZIM LABORATORIES LTD., B-21/22, MIDC AREA, KALM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC640REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9975-9976 OF2024[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS.5034-5035 OF2019]. A. B. GOVARDHAN APPELLANT VERSUS P. RAGOTHAMAN RESPONDENT JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.Heard Mr. Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior counsel for the respondent.2. Leave granted. The pending applications shall be dealt with in the final pages of this judgment.3. The present appeals germinate from the:3. 1. Final Judgment and Order dated 22.02.2017 (hereinafter referred to as the First Impugned Order)1 passed by a Division Bench of the 1 2017 SCC OnLine Mad 11918 | (2017) 3 CTC777| (2017) 3 Mad LJ522| (2017) 4 LW421 2 High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Original Side Appeal2 No.189 of 2011, whereby the appeal filed by the respondent was allowed and Judgment dated 01.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF20222024 INSC659REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF2022V.S. PALANIVEL . APPELLANT Versus P. SRIRAM, CS, LIQUIDATOR, ETC. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.A. BACKDROP1 The appellant - V.S. Palanivel (shareholder/former Managing Director of M/s Sri Lakshmi Hotel Private Limited) has filed the present appeals against the judgment and order dated 16th September, 2022, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench1 in three Company Appeals2 preferred by him. The details of the said Company Appeals are (i) Company Appeal No.336 of 2021 (subject matter of Civil Appeal No.9059 of 2022) filed against the common judgment dated 17th November, 2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench3 rejecting an application4 1 In short Tribunal 2 Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins} No.336 of 2021; Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.339 of 2021 and Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :01. 08.2024 Pronounced on :28. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.4914 OF2024BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY SIT CID REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY PROF. SRI RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SPL.PP A/W SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, SPL.PP) AND: SRI REVANNA H. D., S/O H.D.DEVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT66YEARS MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY HOLENARSIPURA CONSTITUENCY STATE OF KARNATAKA RESIDING AT CHENNAMBIKA NILAYA CHENNAMBIKA CIRCLE HOLENARSIPURA, HASSAN - 573 211. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE A/W., 2 SRI SOMEGOWDA A. N., ADVOCATE AND SRI MADHAV B.KASHYAP, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION4392) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND CANCEL THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF GRANT OF BAIL U/S439OF CR.P.C. DATED1305.2024, TO THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED NO.1 IN CRL.MISC.NO.4229/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC636IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3573 OF2024 [ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.3945 OF2022]. MANIK MADHUKAR SARVE & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS VITTHAL DAMUJI MEHER & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.Leave granted.2. The present appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 13.10.20211 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Order), passed by 1 Operative portion pronounced in Open Court on 13.10.2021, however the detailed Order was uploaded on the High Courts official website on 30.10.2021. 2 a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Criminal Application (BA) No.867/2021, whereby and whereunder respondent no.1 was released on bail in connection with Crime No.217/2019 registered with Police Station Kotwali, Nagpur for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC637IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2024(@ SLP (Crl.) No.5416/2024) PREM PRAKASH APPELLANT(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal challenges the judgment dated 22.03.2024 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in B.A. No.9863 of 2023. By the said judgment, the High Court dismissed the bail application of the appellant. The appellant sought for regular bail in connection with ECIR Case No.5 of 2023 in ECIR-RNZO/10/2023 (hereinafter referred to as ECIR Case No.5 of 2023) registered for the offence 1 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as PMLA) and pending before the Court of Special Judge, PMLA, Ranchi. Brief Facts 3. The predicate offence on the basis of which ECIR No.5 of 2023 was recorded on 07.03.2023 is an FIR bearing Sadar P.S. Case No.399 of 2022 r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC631REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7595 of 2021 BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HIREHALLI SOLAR POWER PROJECT LLP & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7608 OF2021WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6386 OF2021Table of Contents Facts: .......................................................................................................................................... 2 KERCs order: . ........................................................................................................................ 5 APTELs impugned order:. .................................................................................................... 6 Submissions:. ......................................................................................................................... 10 Scope of Supreme Courts appellate jurisdiction under Section 125 of the Act:13. Analysis on merits:. ................................
Tag this Judgment!