Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38623 MFA No.7089 of 2016 C/W MFA No.6824 of 2016 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.7089 OF2016(MV-D) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.6824 OF2016(MV-D) IN MFA No.7089/2016 BETWEEN: THE LEGAL MANAGER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, No.305, 3RD FLOOR, S.S.CORNER BUILDING, OPP BOWRING AND LADY CURZON HOSPITAL, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 002. NOW AT SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 5/4, 3RD CROSS, S.V.ARCADE, BELAKANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP: BANNERAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, II M.B.POST, BANGALORE - 560 076. BY ITS MANAGER. APPELLANT (BY SRI. O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. NAGAMMA, AGE51YEARS, W/O LATE NANDISHAPPA, - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38623 MFA No.7089 of 2016 C/W MFA No.6824 of 2016 2. SRI. N. RUDRESH, AGE31YEARS, S/O LATE NANDISHAPPA, 3. SRI. MAHESH N., AGE27YEARS, S/O LATE NANDISHAPPA, R/AT BODANAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SAMETHAN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC692REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9702 OF2024KUKREJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9703 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9704 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9705 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9706 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9707 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9708 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9709 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9710 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9711 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL NO.9712 OF2024Page 1 of 86 JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J.These appeals have been filed against three impugned judgments and orders of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, namely, i) Judgment dated 18.12.2018 whereby Writ Petition Nos. 1898/2009, 1823/2012, 839/2015, 2871/2015, 2107/2016, 2170/2016, 384/2017 and 541/2017 were rejected on the ground of delay and laches and the writ petitioners therein/appellants herein have filed an appeal. Writ Petition Nos. 203/2014 and 2262/2010 were allowed and Writ Petition No.1860/2017 was p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:13121 WP No.77807 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE R THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION No.77807 OF2013(GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. M/S. SRI LAXMI BALAJI INDUSTRIES, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.440/A/5, NAVALI ROAD, KARATAGI, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS , SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA.2. M/S. SRI LAXMI VINAYAKA, RICE INDUSTRIES, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.440/A/5, NAVALI ROAD, KARATAGI, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS , SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.R. KAMALACHARAN, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. LAKSHMI VENKATESHWAR RICE INDUSTRIES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: SINDHANUR ROAD, SIRUGUPPA, BELLARY DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. S. DATTA SHABAREESH. RESPONDENT (BY SMT. V. VIDYA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC695NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8374 OF2024SRI SIDDARAJA MANICKA PRABHU TEMPLE APPELLANT VERSUS THE IDOL OF ARULMIGHU KAMAKALA KAMESHWARAR TEMPLE ... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.1. The challenge in this Appeal pertains to the Judgment dated 26.10.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as the Madras High Court) in Original Side Appeal No.272 of 2011, whereby the appeal preferred by the Appellant-Defendant was dismissed.2. The relevant facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present challenge are succinctly enumerated as follows. The subject matter in question comprises of Civil Appeal No.8374 of 2024 Page 1 of 22 an immovable property located adjacent to the Respondent-Plaintiff-Temple, namely, Kamakala Kameshwarar Temple (hereinafter referred to as the suit property or Schedule A property). The suit property and the Respondent-Plain...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC683REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3083 OF2024JASEELA SHAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant, who is the wife of one Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji (Shaji A.K.)1, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 4th March 2024 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1271 of 20232, vide which it has dismissed the said habeas corpus petition filed by 1 Hereinafter referred to as detenu. 2 habeas corpus petition 1 the appellant for production of the detenu, who was detained pursuant to the order of detention dated 31st August 20233 passed under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 19744.2. By order dated 31st of July 2024, this Court allowed the present appeal; quashed and set aside the impugned judgment and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.11440 OF2011C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.206 OF2018IN MFA No.11440/2011: BETWEEN:1. LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGED41YEARS, 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED36YEARS, 3. ANAND, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED13YEARS, THIRD APPELLANT IS A MINOR HENCE HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THE FIRST APPELLANT ALL ARE R/AT GINKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, AND NOW AT No.102M2D CROSS, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V.SHYAMAPRASAD, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 AND:1. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANZ INS. CO. LTD., No.132, SRI BALAJI SOVEREIGN, 2ND FLOOR, BEXT TO URBAN EDGE, BRIGADE ROA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.11440 OF2011C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.206 OF2018IN MFA No.11440/2011: BETWEEN:1. LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGED41YEARS, 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED36YEARS, 3. ANAND, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA @ MOOGAPPA, AGED13YEARS, THIRD APPELLANT IS A MINOR HENCE HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THE FIRST APPELLANT ALL ARE R/AT GINKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, AND NOW AT No.102M2D CROSS, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V.SHYAMAPRASAD, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38401 MFA No.11440 of 2011 C/W MFA No.206 of 2018 AND:1. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANZ INS. CO. LTD., No.132, SRI BALAJI SOVEREIGN, 2ND FLOOR, BEXT TO URBAN EDGE, BRIGADE ROA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO.894 OF2023(S-RES) BETWEEN:1. . THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009 2 . THE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURSES) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CAUVERY BHAVAN K.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009 3 . THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED SIDDAGANGA COMPLEX B.H. ROAD TUMAKURU - 572 102 4 . THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY PRASARANA BHAVANA3D FLOOR - 2 - SANTHEPET B.M.ROAD HASSAN - 573 201 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI CHANDRACHUD A, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . SRI NAVEEN KUMAR S. S/O SRI SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT40YEARS WORKING AS MECHANIC GRDE-II BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED KYATHSANDRA SECTION TU...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC686IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.23320 of 2023) ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... APPELLANT VERSUS BERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED ..... RESPONDENT W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24489 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26938 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 26990-26991 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27353 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1344 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2115 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8131 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12170 of 2024) A N D CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:37322 CRL.P No.11994 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11994 OF2023BETWEEN:1. HANUMANTHA S/O SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, NEAR SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE, GUNJUR, VIRTHUR, BENGALURU 560 087.2. MANJUNATHA S/O PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT29YEARS, RESIDING AT No.272, NEAR DODDAMMA TEMPLE, GUNJUR, VARTHUR, BENGALURU 560 087. PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHASHI KIRAN V., ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VARTHUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:37322 CRL.P No.11994 of 2023 2. RAJ KUMAR PROBATIONARY POLICE OFFICER, VARTHUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU 560 087. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAGADEESHA B.N., ADDL.SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C.,(528 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS HEREIN WHO ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2IN C.C.NO...
Tag this Judgment!