Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 2013 section 468 powers of central government to make rules relating to winding up Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 132 results (2.640 seconds)

Jan 17 2022 (SC)

Devas Multimedia Private Limited Vs. Antrix Corporation Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5766 of 2021 DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. ... APPELLANT(S) Versus ANTRIX CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.5906 of 2021 JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Challenging an order of winding up passed by the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 1 2013 (for short the 2013 Act), which was confirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on appeals, the company in liquidation, namely, Devas Multimedia Private Limited, through its exDirector has come up with an appeal in Civil Appeal No.5766 of 2021 and one of the shareholders of the company in liquidation, namely, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as DEMPL) has come up with another appeal in CA No.5906 of 2021.2. We have heard Shri Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel appearing for the company in liquidation, Shri Arvind P. Datar, learned senior counsel...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2024 (SC)

Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC757REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11005 OF2024(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.17383/2024) BANSHIDHAR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question that falls for consideration before this Court is whether the Respondent Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) was justified in rejecting the Technical bid of the Appellant, while accepting the Technical bid of the Respondent No.8 - Company, and declaring it to be successful bidder, though the Respondent No.8 had not complied with the mandatory requirement of submitting the important documents relating to the qualification criteria as contained in Clause 10 of the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 16.08.2023, and thereby had failed to qualify the Eligibility criteria laid down therein?. 1 3. The Appellant-Banshidhar Construction Private Limited has assailed the Jud...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Khalsa University Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC751IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of SLP(C) No.33094 of 2017) KHALSA UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 1st November 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No.17150 of 2017 (O&M), whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants inter-alia seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari praying for quashing The Khalsa University (Repeal) Act 2017 dated 17th July 2017. 1 FACTS:3. The facts giving rise to this appeal lie in a narrow compass. 3.1. In the year 2010, the State of Punjab framed the Punjab Private Universities Policy, 20101. 3.2. The Khalsa College Charitable Society, Amritsar,2 (appellant No.2 herein), which was in existence since 1892, submitted a proposal ...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Chief Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Vs. M/s Safari Ret ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC756REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2948 OF2023Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. Appellants versus M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd. & Ors. Respondents with WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 804 of 2022 & 1030 of 2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.2949 OF2023WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 1036 of 2022 & 90 of 2023 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.846 of 2023 and WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.847 of 2023 JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The issues which broadly arise in this group of matters concern clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023 etc. Page 1 of 91 the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the CGST Act). There is a challenge to the constitutional validity of the said provision. There is a prayer for reading down the said provision.2. In Civil Appeal Nos. 2948 and 2949 of 2023, the first respondent is engaged in the construction of a shopping mall for the purpose o...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC753Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.1404 of 2023 Sukanya Shantha Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Contents I. The Writ Petition .................................................................................................. 4 II. Submissions ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Constitutional Interpretation ................................................................................. 6 IV. The Constitution of Emancipation, Equality, and Dignity ...................................... 9 V. The Contours of Article 14 ................................................................................. 17 VI. Non-Discrimination under Article 15 ............................................................... 23 VII. The Ban on Untouchability in Article 17 ...................................

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Union Of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC754Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 Union of India & Ors. Appellants Versus Rajeev Bansal Respondent WITH C.A. No.8631/2024 C.A. No.9270/2024 C.A. No.8632/2024 C.A. No.10238/2024 C.A. No.8640/2024 C.A. No.10239/2024 C.A. No.10240/2024 C.A. No.8644/2024 C.A. No.8641/2024 C.A. No.8650/2024 C.A. No.8645/2024 C.A. No.8643/2024 C.A. No.8649/2024 Page 1 of 112 C.A. No.8652/2024 C.A. No.8642/2024 C.A. No.8647/2024 C.A. No.8636/2024 C.A. No.8646/2024 C.A. No.8639/2024 C.A. No.8648/2024 C.A. No.8634/2024 C.A. No.8651/2024 C.A. No.8653/2024 C.A. No.8637/2024 C.A. No.8654/2024 C.A. No.8658/2024 C.A. No.8661/2024 C.A. No.8638/2024 C.A. No.8659/2024 C.A. No.8660/2024 C.A. No.8662/2024 C.A. No.8655/2024 C.A. No.8664/2024 T.P.(C) No.767/2023 C.A. No.9253/2024 C.A. No.8702/2024 C.A. No.8667/2024 Page 2 of 112 C.A. No.8666/2024 C.A. No.8843-8844/2024 C.A. No.8668/2024 C.A. No.8678/2024 C.A. No.8680/2024 C.A. No.8679/20...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

K. Bharathi Devi Vs. The State Of Telangana

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC750REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.________OF2024[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.4353 of 2018]. K. BHARTHI DEVI AND ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 1st September 2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, whereby the High Court dismissed the Criminal Petition No.5778 of 2016 filed by the accused persons, including the 1 appellants herein, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC. for short) thereby seeking quashing of the charge-sheet in C.C. No.16 of 2014 on the file of Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Nampally, Hyderabad (trial Court for short).3. Shorn of details, the case of the prosecution is as given below. 3.1 K. Suresh Kumar (Accused No.1), the Sole ...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2024 (HC)

Pradosh S Rao Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:41152 WP No.23848 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE1T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.23848 OF2024(GM-RES) BETWEEN: PRADOSH S.RAO S/O SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT40YEARS RESIDING AT NO.56, J.P.ROAD80T ROAD, GIRINAGAR1T PHASE BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU - 560 085. PETITIONER (BY SRI HITESH GOWDA B. J., ADVOCATE A/W., SRI ADITYA D., ADVOCATE AND SRI SANTOSH V., ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (PCAS) DEPARTMENT OF HOME REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001.2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES NO.4 SHESHADRI ROAD, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 009.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:41152 WP No.23848 of 2024 3. THE CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON-BANGALORE PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BENGALURU 560 068. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W., SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2024 (HC)

M/s Patanjali Foods Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Central Excise And Ser ...

Court : Karnataka

-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CEA No.6 OF2024BETWEEN M/S PATANJALI FOODS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RUCHI HOUSE SURVEY NO.169, ROYAL PALMS, AAREY COLONY GOREGAON (EAST) MUMBAI-400065 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SHRI T GAJENDRA DEPUTY MANAGER - LEGAL ...APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJESH RAWAL, ADVCOATE FOR SRI CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY K P, ,ADVOCATE) AND COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX7H FLOOR, TRADE CENTRE, BUNTS HOSTEL ROAD MANGALORE-575003 RESPONDENT (BY SRI JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE) THIS CEA / CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION35 OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT1944 PRAYING TO -2- ADMIT AND ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL, FRAME AND CONSIDER THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS SET OUT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL OR ANY OTHER SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW THAT ARISES FOR CON...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2024 (HC)

Dr Shanth A Thimmaiah Vs. The Government Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO.15313 OF2024(GM-POL) BETWEEN:1. . DR. SHANTH A. THIMMAIAH B.TECH. M. TECH., (INDL. POLLUTION CONTROL) AND PHD. (SE AND EIS) S/O. THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, CHAIRMAN, KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PARISARA BHAVANA, No.49, CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE - 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI VIVEK S. REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE & SRI ANAND SANJAY M. NULI, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.-. 2 - 2 . THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, No.708 M.S. BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR, NEAR VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3 . MR. B. P. RAVI S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DE...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //