Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:11979-DB MFA No.101563 of 2017 C/W MFA No.101909 of 2016 MFA No.101910 of 2016 & 12 OTHERS R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101563 OF2017(MV-D) C/W. MFA NOS.101909/2016, 101910/2016, 101911/2016, 101912/2016, 101913/2016, 101914/2016, 104164/2016, 104165/2016, 104166/2016, 104167/2016, 104168/2016, 104169/2016 (MV-I) 100409/2017 (MV-D) & MFA NO.103790/2022 IN MFA NO.101563 OF2017BETWEEN: BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI, BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. HARIPRIYA W/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE ABOUT36YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, AHTANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.2. KUMARI. HARSHITA D/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE14YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.3. K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:11979-DB MFA No.101563 of 2017 C/W MFA No.101909 of 2016 MFA No.101910 of 2016 & 12 OTHERS R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101563 OF2017(MV-D) C/W. MFA NOS.101909/2016, 101910/2016, 101911/2016, 101912/2016, 101913/2016, 101914/2016, 104164/2016, 104165/2016, 104166/2016, 104167/2016, 104168/2016, 104169/2016 (MV-I) 100409/2017 (MV-D) & MFA NO.103790/2022 IN MFA NO.101563 OF2017BETWEEN: BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI, BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. HARIPRIYA W/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE ABOUT36YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, AHTANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.2. KUMARI. HARSHITA D/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE14YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.3. K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:11979-DB MFA No.101563 of 2017 C/W MFA No.101909 of 2016 MFA No.101910 of 2016 & 12 OTHERS R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101563 OF2017(MV-D) C/W. MFA NOS.101909/2016, 101910/2016, 101911/2016, 101912/2016, 101913/2016, 101914/2016, 104164/2016, 104165/2016, 104166/2016, 104167/2016, 104168/2016, 104169/2016 (MV-I) 100409/2017 (MV-D) & MFA NO.103790/2022 IN MFA NO.101563 OF2017BETWEEN: BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI, BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. HARIPRIYA W/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE ABOUT36YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, AHTANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.2. KUMARI. HARSHITA D/O. SHRIKANT JOSHI, AGE14YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. NO.47, VIKRAMPUR, ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591304.3. K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC621IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 30976 of 2017) RAJKARAN SINGH & ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Heard.2. Leave granted.3. The present appeal by special leave, is preferred on behalf of the appellants, assailing the judgment dated 25th April, 2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No.3543 of 2017, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants and upholding the judgment dated 4th October, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter being referred to as the Tribunal) in Original Application Nos. 60 of 2013 and 459 of 2013. The Tribunal had 1 rejected the appellants claim for benefits of the replacement scales of the Revised Pay Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as RP Rules) in accordance with the 6th Pay Commission Report, with effect from 1st Januar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC627REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1970 OF2020DR. VIJAY DIXIT & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PAGADAL KRISHNA MOHAN & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.1. This appeal arises from an order dated 22.07.2016 in Consumer Complaint No.280 of 2015 (hereinafter the Impugned Order), wherein the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the NCDRC) forfeited the right of the Appellant(s) to file its written statement on account of the Appellant(s) lapse in conforming to statutory period prescribed for filing its written statement, under Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the Act).2. The facts and proceedings germane to the contextual understanding of the present lis are as follows: C.A. No.1970 of 2020 Page 1 of 82.1. The Respondent(s) filed a Consumer Complaint No.280 of 2015 before the NCDRC on 12.05.2015, claiming a total amount of INR4736,25,000 (Indian Rupees Fort...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:34036 MFA No.10896 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA MFA No.10896 OF2013(MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. Y. SUBRAMANYAM S/O. Y. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/AT: KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE GANGAVARAM MANDAL PALAMANER TALUK CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH BABU K N., ADV.) AND:1. MR. VALORU RAVI KUMAR S/O V. BASANNA, 6-354 KANEKAL VILLAGE & MANDAL ANANTPUR-515 001, A.P.2. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. NO.2-B, UNITY BUILDING ANNEX MISSION ROAD BANGALORE - 26 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A M VENKATESH, ADV. FOR R2 R1 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED24.2013 PASSED IN MVC No.7795/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE, (SCCH.NO.12), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.-. 2 - NC:2024...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC646REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4887-4888/2024 UNION OF INDIA Appellant VERSUS BAHAREH BAKSHI Respondent JUDGMENT1 Heard Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant Union of India. Also heard Mr. Ankur Mahindro, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. The consideration to be made in this matter is whether the presence of the estranged husband is mandatory to process an application for Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) Card, under Section 7-A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The respondent had filed the WP(C) No.10807/2020 in the High Court of Delhi for dispensing with the presence of the husband of the respondent. The learned Single Judge Page 1 of 17 dispensed with the presence of the husband of respondent and this view was affirmed by the learned Division Bench under the impugned order dated 25.03.2022. Hence the Civil Appeal at the instance of Union of India.3. In the W...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC619NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.878 OF2019AJAY KUMAR GUPTA APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The appellant is accused no.2. Along with other co- accused, he was prosecuted for the offences punishable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the NDPS Act). The case of the prosecution is that the Narcotics Control Bureau (for short, NCB) received secret information on 21st December 2013 that a consignment of pentazocine, a psychotropic substance, was being transported illegally from Hajipur to Lucknow by train for being sold in the market as an intoxicating item. The NCB team mounted surveillance near the parcel house of Hajipur station. When accused no.1 - Jasvinder Singh reached there, he was intercepted. According to the prosecution case, accused no.1 identified the consignment he had booked from the railway parcel house. Du...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC617IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.149 OF2024GIRISH GANDHI PETITIONER (s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. The present Writ Petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner-Girish Gandhi seeking an appropriate Writ or Direction to the effect that the personal bonds and sureties executed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.0030 of 2021 dated 21.01.2021 registered at P.S. Sadar, District Gurugram, shall hold good for eleven other bail orders passed in his favour from the Courts of different States. Details of the bail orders in different FIRs have been elaborated hereinbelow. 12. The question that arises for consideration is, is the petitioner entitled to the relief of treating the personal bond and one set of sureties already furnished as holding good for the other bail orders also?. Brief Facts:- 3. Very broadl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC615IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5051 OF2023REKHA SHARMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5052/2023 RATANLAL APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Both the appeals having common question of law and facts were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. The facts in nutshell are that the respondent High Court had issued an advertisement for the direct recruitment of 120 posts of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate under the Civil Judge Cadre. The appellant-Ms. 1 Rekha Sharma, having 40% permanent disability in relation to her eyes, had applied for the said post. The appellant-Ratan Lal having locomotor disability i.e. 55% permanent physical impairment in relation to his right upper limb, had also applied for the said post. Both having appeared in the Preliminary Examination we...
Tag this Judgment!