Companies Act 1956 Schedule 5 - Judgment Search Results

Dundappa Shivalingappa Adi Vs. S.G. Motor Transport Company (P) Ltd. a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1966Kant150; AIR1966Mys150; [1967]37CompCas114(Kar); (1965)1MysLJ557

..... of the person making an application for an order that the company shall be wound up under section 433 of the companies act 1956 schedule ii article 17 vii is equally inapplicable since that article ..... the provisions of this article 5 mr government pleader maintained the argument that an order made by the court under the companies act refusing an order that the company shall be wound up is .....

Dundappa Shivalingappa Adi Vs. S.G. Motor Transport Co. (P) Ltd. and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas606b(Kar)

..... of the person making an application for an order that the company shall be wound up under section 433 of the companies act 1956 schedule ii article 17 vii is equally inapplicable since that article ..... construed as an admission for holding that it proved the factum of partition partition d v shylendra kumar j palu patti though palu patti regarding earlier partition is not attracted by .....

Rajendra Nath Dutta and ors. Vs. Shibendra Nath Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas293(Cal),85CWN1028

..... article 113 more or less is in similar terms with our companies act 1956 schedule i table a para 84 in his commentary on company law it has been stated as follows if the seal ..... 1948 1 all er 21 at 29 1948 18 comp cas 236 248 ca grundt v great boulder proprietary gold mines ltd their lordships of the court of appeal held inter .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kanpur Vs. Kailash Auto Finance Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

..... and loss account is to be prepared according to the provision of companies act 1956 schedule vi in the case of assessee s company provision for npa has been made only to comply with the ..... bad debts as per section 36 1 vii so the claimed deduction is not allowable 5 on the other hand sri s d singh learned senior advocate assisted by sri k .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Modi Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1993Delhi1; [1992]197ITR655(Delhi)

..... redemption fund to be adjudged as a reserve capital of the company 2 words and phrases provision reserve distinguished 3 companies profits sur tax act 1964 2nd schedule 4 companies act 1956 schedule vi part iii form of balance sheet question was whether the ..... the bombay high court in the case of cit v in these circumstances it clearly appears to us that the debenture redemption since the aggregate .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Vs. Shalimar Tar Products (1935) L ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1980)17CTR(Cal)133,[1981]127ITR86(Cal)

..... of the character of provision the surplus referred to in item 5 of schedule vi to the companies act 1956 is the surplus which remains over after allocation of reserves as the subsidies in question ..... us 17 last of all with reference to pt i of schedule vi of the companies act 1956 and relying on our decision in the case of cit v indian standard wagon co ltd 1979 116itr539 cal mr bagchi contends .....

Sri Hariram Hotels P Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Iii)

Court : Karnataka

..... bom has held that even under clause 3 xii b of part ii of 5 schedule vi to the companies act 1956 companies act for short profit or losses in respect of transactions of an exceptional or ..... and loss account which is mandatory requirement as set out in these provisions under schedule vi of the companies act having not been followed the income tax authorities are justified in rescrutinizing the book .....

Sebi Vs. Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... on june 18 1992 and section 69 read with clause 5 of schedule ii of companies act 1956 and terms and conditions of the prospectus 2 5 hitek proceeded with the allotment of shares before the realization ..... on june 18 1992 and section 69 read with clause 5 of schedule ii of companies act 1956 and terms and conditions of the prospectus 8 5 further hitek has proceeded with the allotment of shares before .....

Commissioner of Income-tax and Super Profits Tax Vs. Eyre Smelting Pvt ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1979]118ITR857(Cal)

..... of a deduction and came within the definition of provisions in item 7 of schedule vi of the companies act 1956 5 the tribunal considered the decision of the supreme court in the case of ..... is a provision see william pickles accountancy second edition p 102 part iii clause 7 schedule vi of the companies act 1956 which defines provision and reserve 14 from the above observation of the supreme court it .....

Sebi Vs. Shri Prem Prakash Verma, Promoter

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... june 18 1992 and section 69 read with clause 5 of schedule ii of companies act 1956 and terms and conditions of the prospectus 2 6 ..... of power of attorney the said act of hitek is in violation of section 77 of companies act 1956 2 5 the issue is under subscribed ..... with the provisions of section 69 section 73 of companies act 1956 and guidelines for disclosure and investor protection issued by sebi .....