Companies Act 1956 Schedule 5 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 1956 schedule 5 Court: chennai Page 1 of about 640 results (0.891 seconds)Tractors and Farm Equipments Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1994)49TTJ(Mad)500
..... reserves and iii sinking funds occurring in that order as item nos 5 6 and 7 under the heading reserves and surplus in part i form of balance sheet of schedule vi of the companies act 1956 shall not be regarded as reserves for purposes of computation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ashok Leyland Ltd.
Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1995]216ITR26(Mad)
..... as a reserve for the purposes of computation of the capital of a company under the provisions of this schedule items 5 6 and 7 under the heading reserves and surplus in sch vi to the companies act 1956 were are 5 surplus i e balance in the profit and loss account after providing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jawahar Mills Ltd. (No. 1)
Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1997]226ITR227(Mad)
..... similar nature in the case of cit v vazir sultan tobacco co ltd 1988 173itr567 ap wherein it was held as under part i schedule vi to the companies act 1956 prescribes the form in which the ..... balance sheet shall be prepared by a company the pro forma contains separate columns for liabilities .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.Arunagiri Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.
Court : Chennai
..... benefit nidhi company registered under the companies act 1956 b the second defendant partnership firm filed a loan application on 16 6 1995 for a loan of rs 5 crores on the mortgage of the plaint a schedule property ..... is a partnership firm which can never be a shareholder of a company as per section 41 2 of the companies act 1956 w the loan documents were executed by the plaintiff and not by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax. Vs. Ms.Nepc India Limited
Court : Chennai
..... relevant assessment year in accordance with the provisions of parts ii and iii of schedule vi to the companies act 1956 12 in considering the said provision in the decision reported in 2002 vol ..... revised return when such return was filed beyond the time limit prescribed under section 139 5 and2 whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the tribunal was right in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Lakshmi Mills Company Ltd.
Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1996]221ITR753(Mad)
..... are as under 5 surplus i e balance in profit and loss account after providing for ..... 5 6 and 7 under the heading reserves and surplus in the column relating to liabilities in the form of balance sheet given in the part i of schedule vi of the companies act 1956 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSalem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...
Court : Chennai
..... it makes a mention about the companies act 1956 and securities contracts regulation act 1956 all the three of which were amended by section 41 read with schedule to the securitisation act 2002 14 5 before proceeding further it would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Pitchumani Vs. the Management of Sri Chakra Tyres Ltd., Rep. by Its ...
Court : Chennai
Reported in : [2004]121CompCas127(Mad); [2004(102)FLR384]; (2004)IILLJ994Mad
..... are all companies registered under the companies act 1956 they do not come within the definition of state under article 12 of the indian constitution unfair labour practice particularly clause 7 of schedule v of industrial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadras Techno Marine Enterprises Ltd. and anr. Vs. Regional Director, ...
Court : Chennai
..... 265 of the constitution of india and section 3 5 560 642 and regulations 75 of table a to schedule i of the companies act 1956 in so far as the petitioner is concerned 4 ..... g 265 of the constitution of india and section 3 5 560 642 and regulation 75 of table a to schedule i of the companies act 1956 in so far as the petitioner is concerned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs.Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Joint Commissioner
Court : Chennai
..... income tax rules as against the rates given in the companies act in terms of parts ii and iii of schedule vi to the 1956 act thus the supreme court referred the decision reported in ..... v cit to a larger bench 12 leaving this aspect aside the apex court pointed out that by legislative incorporation only parts ii and iii of schedule vi to the 1956 of the companies act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT