Companies Act 1956 Schedule 5 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 1956 schedule 5 Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 369 results (0.695 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Braithwaite, Burn and Jessop Constructi ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-24-1977
Reported in : [1978]113ITR577(Cal)
..... accountancy second edition page 192 part iii clause 7 schedule vi to the companies act 1956 which defines provision and reserve c commissioner of income tax v periakaramalai tea produce co ltd 1973 92itr65 ker ..... be taken into account in the computation of capital under the second schedule to the super profits tax act 1963 5 the super profits tax officer held that this item could not be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Steel and Wire Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-09-1977
Reported in : [1978]112ITR1(Cal)
..... to liabilities in the form of balance sheet given in part i of schedule vi to the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 shall not be regarded as a reserve for the purposes of computation ..... view of the decisions of the supreme court in the case of karnani properties ltd v commissioner of income tax 1971 82itr547 sc and in the case of commissioner of income .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. W.H. Harton and Co. Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-25-1977
Reported in : [1978]113ITR708(Cal)
..... of part ii of the first schedule to the said act under ..... the accounting year 1956 at the annual general meeting held in 1957 5 in the finance act 1959 there is a provision for levy of 50 as super tax on companies vide para d .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJialal Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-02-1977
Reported in : 1977WLN61
..... company in the board of directors of the company which acts under the provisions of the companies act 1956 the company being a limited liability company registered under the companies act ..... in clause b of para ii of the schedule to the act namely i compensation equated to the cost price ..... 226 of the constitution in praga tools corporation v c v imanual and ors 1969 iillj479sc a similar question .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-22-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Cal328
..... in accordance with the provisions of section 349 of the companies act 1956 and shall not exceed a in respect of the first rs 5 lakhs of such net profits 10 per cent and ..... allowance in terms of the provisions laid down in paragraph xiii 3 of the sixth schedule should be limited to the actual expenditure incurred and should not exceed the ceiling specified .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Secretary to the Council of the Chartered Accountants of India Vs. ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-18-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Kant124; 1977(1)KarLJ255
..... present case is similar to that of the auditor under the indian companies act 1956 in such a case the audit is intended for the protection ..... of s 22 read with cls 6 and 7 of the schedule of the act the contention therefore cannot prevail 13 we now turn to ..... reference disposed accordingly code of civil procedure 1908 order 38 rule 5 a n venugopala gowda j attachment before judgment suit for specific .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadha Ram Badri Nath and ors. Vs. Amritsar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. and or ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-08-1977
Reported in : (1977)79PLR387
..... whether the proceedings for winding up of an industrial undertaking which is a company as defined in the companies act 1956 hereinafter called the companies act can be commenced or continued under s 433 of that ..... order to conserve any specified resources of national importance or v it is being managed in a manner highly detrimental to the scheduled industry or vi if the persons in charge of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Fin ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-08-1977
Reported in : 1979CENCUS91D
..... madras aluminium company limited the petitioner is a company registered under the companies act of 1956 the aluminium produced by the company is subject ..... but excluding extrusions and foils as specified in the schedule appended to this notification schedulefair selling prices for ..... the order of the superintendent central excise mettur 5 mr v k thiruvenkatachari learned counsel for the petitioner would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-i Vs. I.B.M. World Trade Corpo ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-15-1977
Reported in : [1981]130ITR739(Bom)
contended that when s 33 1 of the i t act refers to exclusion of office appliances for the purposes of and spares as contemplated by items 52 of the said schedule held that development rebate to the extent of rs 3 50 870 was wrongly allowed as a deduction and made an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras Vs. ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-05-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Mad242; (1978)1MLJ327
answering the question posed by the revenue under the stamp act the civil court ought not to hazard such investigations 10 ii of 1899 attracting stamp duty under article 23 of schedule 1 of the stamp act the executant of the instrument which was latterly registered in a manner known to law 5 mr venkataswami the learned additional government pleader would rely upon
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT