Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Companable - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 19 2012

Oriental Insurance Companly Ltd. Vs. Bhaglu

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-19-2012

Additional Member to Fifth Additional Motor Accident Tribunal (Fast Track Court) Chhindwara in M.V.C No. 39/2009, appellant Insurance Company has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereafter referred as Act, 1988).Claim


Jul 22 2013

indrajit Singh Vs. M/S Tata Iron and Steel Compan

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-22-2013

COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No.7749 of 2011 Indrajit Singh .... Petitioner Versus M/s Tata Iron Steel Company & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sarvendra


Aug 14 2013

M/S New India Assurance Compan Vs. Manjhli Manjhian and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-14-2013

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI MA.No.164of2010 M/sNewIndiaAssuranceCompanyLtd. Appellant Versus ManjhliManjhian&Others Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :M/sDr.N.Thakur,Advocate FortheRespondents:Mr.S.K.Laik,Advocate I.A.No.3409of2010 06/14.08.2013 I.A.No.3409of2010hasbeenfiledonbehalfofappellantforcondoning thedelayof80daysinfilingthisappeal. R1 to R5 have appeared through their counsel whereas the notice againstR6hasvalidlybeenservedbutnobodyisappearingonhisbehalf. OnbeingsatisfiedwiththegroundstakenintheI.A.,thedelayof80days infilingthisappealisherebycondoned. Listthiscaseundertheheading'foradmission'. I.A.No.3409of2010standsdisposedof. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2003

Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. a Company Registered and Incorporated Unde ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-28-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)ARBLR268(Bom); 2003(5)BomCR579; 2004(1)MhLj1112

have jurisdiction. Learned Counsel relied upon the judgment in the case of Patel Roadways Ltd. v. Prasad Trading Company, : [1991]3SCR391 . 2. With the above the controversy in issue may be decided. The provisions of the


Apr 27 2004

Md. Rasheed, S/O. Md. Sardar Vs. Susheela Agarwal, W/O. N. Purushotham ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-27-2004

Reported in: I(2005)ACC560; 2006ACJ678; 2004(4)ALD597; 2004(5)ALT152

C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Appellant filed a claim petition alleging that on 19.10.1995 when his auto bearing No.AP-10T-934, being driven by Mohd. Iqbal, reached near Bidar crossroads, vehicle bearing No.AP-11T-8499 belonging to first respondent and insured with...


Dec 06 2005

The Club Orient Resorts a Unit of Orient Orchards Pvt. Ltd. (a Company ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-06-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)AWC646

Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The Club Orient Resorts is a Unit of Orient Orchards Pvt. Ltd. (A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956). It applied for grant of licence in Form FL-7C under the U.P.


Mar 29 2010

Jaibharat Synthetics Limited, a Public Limited Company Registered Unde ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-29-2010

Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR2199

informing the petitioners to handover possession of the immoveable and moveable properties to respondent No. 2-the Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (ARCIL), within 15 days from the date of the notice. The petitioners have also prayed for quashing


Jan 22 2010

Gampa Jaya W/O. Late Mallesham and ors. Vs. M. Satya Shanker Rao S/O. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-22-2010

year 1995-1996 under both heads.6. The respondents 1 and 2 remained ex parte and the third respondent insurance company opposed the claim in the O.Ps. The third respondent denied the accident and involvement of the lorry bearing


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial