Communicator - Judgment Search Results

Employees of Punwire Mobile Communication Ltd. Vs. Punwire Mobile Comm ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas565(P& H); [2004]49SCL616(Punj& Har)

No. 1, quoted above. However, he submits that Punwire Mobile Communications Ltd. the company under liquidation, is a running company and

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Sky Cell Communication Ltd. and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas832(Mad)

licence for providing such service in Tamil Nadu.2. Sky Cell Communications Limited (Sky Cell) was incorporated initially as a private company

M/S Milan Communication Vs. M/S Milan Communication

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR 5982/2012 Date of decision:26/02/2013 M/s Milan Communication .............Petitioner v. M/s Teri Oat Estates Pvt.Ltd.............Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE

Association of the Employees of Indian Institute of Mass Communication ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

the Association of the Employees of Indian Institute of Mass Communication (Registered) under Indian Societies Act, 1860. Clause 10(a) of its

Reliance Communication Limited Vs. State Bank of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.845 OF2018RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LIMITED & ORS. …..PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA &

Geo-group Communications Inc. Vs. Iol Broadband Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(14)SCALE75; (2010)1SCC562

record of the case are as under:The applicant, i.e., Geo-Group Communications, Inc., is a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware

Siemens Public Communication Networks Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC1204; 155(2008)DLT621(SC)

the prime contractor for Indian Army's modernization plan for Technical Communication System (in short the `TCS'). Respondent No. 2 floated a

idea Mobile Communication Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.and C.,cochin

Court: Supreme Court of India

its Judgment pronounced on 15th February, 2002 in Escotel Mobile Communications Ltd. vs. Union of India and Others, reported in (2002)

Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1801; JT1999(3)SC331; 1999(3)SCALE149; (1999)4SCC727; [1999]2SCR1033

granted.2. These two appeals have been filed by the Punjab Communications Ltd (hereinafter called the 'PCL'), a public-sector undertaking of the

Aditya Mass Communications (P) Ltd. Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC3411; I(2004)BC197(SC); JT2003(Suppl2)SC363; (2004)136PLR461; 2003(8)SCALE37; (2003)11SCC17

ORDER1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. A limited question arises for our consideration in this appeal that...