Commodore - Judgment Search Results

Air Commodore V.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998(46)DRJ37

were available during the promotion year 1996-97. Since no Air Commodore was eligible with requi-site service in February, 1996, the Board

Air Commodore I.J.S. Boparai, Vm Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998(44)DRJ1b

for duties of his branch. (c) Group Captain to Air Commodore (i) has served a minimum of three years in the

Commodore F.H. Dubash Vsm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 128(2006)DLT471; 2006(87)DRJ354; [2007]1SCL273(Delhi); 2007(1)SLJ273(Delhi)

1A held on 19 Apr 02 considered four First Look Commodores of Select List Year-1989 (including the petitioner) and Select List

Commodore V. Ravindra Nathan Vsm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(102)DRJ165

that:2. The Ministry has carefully examined the representation submitted by Commodore Nathan and has found that his CR profile is consistent,

Commodore T S Khurana and anr. Vs. Vice Admiral I S Khurana (Retd.) an ...

Court: Delhi

Pronounced on : March 19, 2014 + RFA (OS) 12/2011 COMMODORE T S KHURANA & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Vijay K.Gupta,

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

Angre's LetterCM/203/602 19K/1 dated 09 Oct 03)CHARGE SHEET1. The accused, Commodore Narindra Mohan Munshiram Pandit (60219-K) Indian Navy, then belonging to

Commodore P. K. Banerjee Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

SIKRI, J.Leave to appeal granted.2) This appeal is preferred by Commodore P.K. Banerjee under Section 32 of the Armed Forces Tribunal

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

and status to the rank of the petitioner who is Commodore. He contended that the convening order does not specify any

Air Commodore Satyanarayana Vs. L.V. Prasad Eye Institute and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The complainant a retired Air Commodore, aged about 75 years having an industry at Neredmet, consulted

Commodore Vimal Kumar and ors. Vs. Ruchi Rastogi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2008(4)SC596; 2008(6)SCALE584; 2008AIRSCW5361; JT2008(4)SC596.

ORDER1. This matter has arisen out of a Petition filed by the husband against the wife under Section 406 of...