Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Committed - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 2004

Committed of Management, National Inter College and anr. Vs. Joint Dir ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-30-2004

Reported in: 2005(1)AWC988; 2005(1)ESC740

Matched in: Parties Committed of Management, National Inter College and anr. Vs. Joint Director of Education, Region-i and ors.


Sep 13 2013

Esha Bhattacharjee Vs. Mg.Commit.of Raghunathpur Nafar Acad.Andor

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-13-2013

APPEAL NOS.8183-8184 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 24868-24869 of 2011) Esha Bhattacharjee ... Appellant Versus Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy and others ...Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.1. Leave granted in both the special leave


May 28 2024

Mukil Murali vs the Scrutiny Commit for Verification of Community Cert ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-28-2024

KOLAHALAMEDU P.O. IDUKKI DIST- 685 501 BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.V.BHARGAVI PANANGAD SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SMT.P.A.RINUSA RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE SCRUTINY COMMIT FOR VERIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 17 2017

The Spl.Agr.Produce Market Commit. for Fruits and Vegetables Vs. N.Kri ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-17-2017

CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 5248-5274 OF2017[Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 2355-2381 of 2012]. The Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee For Fruits and Vegetables … Appellant(s) Versus N. Krishnappa and others etc. … Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.5275-5278


May 16 2008

G.M. Ongc, Shilchar Vs. Ongc Contractual Workers Union

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-16-2008

Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR2057; [2008(118)FLR942]; JT2008(7)SC309; (2008)IILLJ1071SC; 2008(8)SCALE665; 2009(2)SLJ28(SC); 2008AIRSCW3996; 2008LABIC26652008(4)Supreme401

engaged a large number of staff in various fields, initially through contractors. These employees later formed the ONGC Contractual Workers Union (hereinafter called the 'Union') which is the contesting respondent in this matter. The Union raised a


Apr 29 2008

Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committed and anr. Vs. Hindustan Le ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-29-2008

Reported in: AIR2008SC2215; 2008(4)ALLMR(SC)418; 106(2008)CLT386(SC); [2008]144CompCas580(SC); 2008(7)SCALE346; (2008)5SCC575

not had not been raised by the respondents and in that view of the matter, the High Court committed a serious error in arriving at the aforementioned conclusion.7. Mr. Gopal Jain, learned Counsel for the respondents, however,


Apr 16 2014

D.A.V.College Mg.Commit.Tr.Regl.Director Vs. Laxminarayan Mishra and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4556 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.31659 of 2011]. D.A.V. College Managing Committee Through Regional Director …..Appellant Versus Laxminarayan Mishra & Ors. …..Respondents W I T H Contempt Petition(C)No.232 of 2013


Sep 04 2014

Vinay Kumar Shailendra Vs. Delhi High Court Legal Ser.Commit.and anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-2014

is situate. Answering the question in the negative this Court held that an offence under Section 138 is committed no sooner the cheque issued on an account maintained by the drawer with a bank and representing discharge


Aug 14 2003

Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. and anr. Vs. C.K. Rajan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-14-2003

Reported in: JT2003(7)SC312; 2003(3)KLT618(SC); 2003(6)SCALE401; (2003)7SCC546

occasions wherein the jurisdiction of the Court to initiate a public interest litigation was questioned, the High Court committed a manifest error in not deciding the same as a preliminary issue.22. The learned counsels further drew our


Feb 25 2015

Cheriakode Modembil Vishnu Temple Commit Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-25-2015

to find the assignment as inequitable.16. Apart from that when the Govt. was convinced of the mistake it committed by assigning the land to petitioner on the face of inquiry reports indicating situations warranting action under Section


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial