Commercial Establishment Act - Judgment Search Results
M.K.Jayaprakash Vs. Labour Commissioner (Shops and Commercial Establis ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
S/O KRISHNANKUTTY CHETTIYAR MUNDAKKAL PARAMBU PUTHUKKALAVATTOM ROAD, KOCHI-26. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. LABOUR COMMISSIONER (SHOPS & COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT), CIVIL LINE BUILDING, KAKKANAD P.O.,PIN:682 030.2. MODERN BAKERIES (INDIA) LTD. CPF TRUST, EDAPPALLY P.O.,PIN:682 024.3. MATHEW J.KATTIKAREN, CLEARING, … 17TH AUGUST 201 IN SA NO.1 OF 201.IN THE COURT OF THE AUTHORITY APPOINTED UNDER THE SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT. EXHIBIT P2: THE PHOTOCOPYOF THE LETER DATED 22 11.2012 FORWARDED TO THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3:
Rajendra Kumar Soni Vs. Authority Under Sec. 20 of Rajasthan Shops and ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-17-1993
Reported in: (1994)IILLJ1149Raj; 1994(1)WLC362
is covered by the Factories Act.15. In Krishnanand Sharma v. The Authority appointed under the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial Establishment Act (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No 2673/89) decided on May 28, 1992 the question of termination of service of
Railway Employees Co-operative Banking Society Ltd. Vs. Authority Unde ... Overruled
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-19-2000
Reported in: [2000(84)FLR1008]; (2000)IIILLJ898Raj; 2000(1)WLC159; 2000(3)WLN344
the petition filed by the appellant against the order passed by the Authority under the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) holding that termination of services of the respondent Daulat Singh in … petition filed by the appellant against the order passed by the Authority under the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) holding that termination of services of the respondent Daulat Singh in Special
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhanamal and Company (P) Ltd. Vs. Authority Appointed Under Rajasthan ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-17-1999
Reported in: [2000(85)FLR768]; (2000)IIILLJ1484Raj; 2000WLC(Raj)UC271
J. 1. Petitioner has challenged the order dated September 30, 1988 passed by Authority under Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, Alwar by which while setting aside the termination of services of respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred … 1. Petitioner has challenged the order dated September 30, 1988 passed by Authority under Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, Alwar by which while setting aside the termination of services of respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to
Badri Lal Vs. the Prescribed Authority Under the Rajasthan Shops and C ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-28-1992
Reported in: 1992WLN(UC)568
writ petition has challenged the judgment dated October 31, 1981, passed by the Authority under the shops and Commercial Establishment Act, by which the learned Authority maintained the order dated November 15, 1978, passed by the Chairman, Mewar Textile … (Armexure. 5) dismissing the petitioner's services, the petitioner made a complaint before the Authority under the Shop and Commercial Establishment Act, Bhilwara. The notice of this complaint/application was given to the defendant and they filed reply and contested the
Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Under the R ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500
In both these writ petitions a common question of law about the applicability of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 to the employees of the petitioner Bank, is involved and, therefore, I have considered it proper to … No. 4088/89 are that the non-petitioner No. 2 filed an application before the Prescribed Authority, Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment, Act, 1958 for Sikar District on 30-3-89 alleging that he was in the employment of the Sikar Central Cooperative
Lal Singh Vs. the Authority Under Shops and Commercial Establishments ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-17-2002
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR898]; RLW2003(3)Raj1829; 2002(4)WLN671
circumstances:The respondent No. 2 Tilak Raj filed a claim petition under Section 28-A of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1958') before the respondent No. 1 Authority under Shops and … 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1958') before the respondent No. 1 Authority under Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958, Sri Ganganagar (for short 'the Authority') on 8.5.1989 stating inter alia that the respondent No. 2 had
Jweller Association Vs. Presiding Officer Appointed Under Section 28-a ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-07-1988
Reported in: 1988(2)WLN669
to give one month's wages still looking to the provisions of Section 29A of the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (for short the Act), the Association paid one month's notice pay to respondent No. 2. … give one month's wages still looking to the provisions of Section 29A of the Rajasthan Shops & Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (for short the Act), the Association paid one month's notice pay to respondent No. 2. The
B.N.K. Sahakari Wholesale Upbhokta Bhandar Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authori ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-08-1985
Reported in: 1986(1)WLN605
application submitted by Shri Jeth Mal Lodha, respondent No. 2 under Section 28A of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 (here in after referred to as 'the Act').2. The petitioner is a Co-operative Society registered under the … the age of superannuation of the employees of the petitioners was fixed at 55 years.;(b) RAJASTHAN SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1959 - Section 28A--Application of--Employee retiring on attaining superannuation age--Held, Section 28A is not attracted and it is
Devi Singh Vs. Authority Under Section 28a(2) of Rajasthan Shop and Co ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-26-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)535
unlawfully terminated by the Company, the petitioner filed an application under Section 28A of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the Act') before the Regional Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jaipur, which is the Competent … terminated by the Company, the petitioner filed an application under Section 28A of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the Act') before the Regional Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jaipur, which is the Competent Authority
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free