Commandeer - Judgment Search Results

Commander vs P.R. Sreekumar,

Court: Kerala

ORDER IN OA NO.654 OF 2019 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION: 1 COMMANDER, CDR (CP)-PAY AND FP, DIRECTORATE OF CIVILIAN PERSONNEL, INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (NAVY), NEW DELHI-110 001.

Commander and Ors. Vs. Bhupendra Kardam and Ors.

Court: Delhi

NEW DELHI Order reserved on May 22, 2015 Order delivered on July 01, 2015 + WP (C) No.3381/2002 COMMANDER AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms.Anjana Gosain, Adv. with Mr.Arnab Naskar, Advocate versus BHUPENDRA KARDAM & ORS Through:

Commander and ors. Vs. Bhupendera Kardeam and ors.

Court: Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 12, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3381/2002 COMMANDER & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Derodya, Advocate versus BHUPENDERA KARDEAM & ORS.

Pew Vs. Commandant

Court: US Supreme Court

PEW v. COMMANDANT - 382 U.S. 421 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court PEW v. COMMANDANT, 382 U.S. 421 (1966) 382 U.S. 421

Relford Vs. Commandant

Court: US Supreme Court

Relford v. Commandant - 401 U.S. 355 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Relford v. Commandant, 401 U.S. 355 (1971) Relford v. Commandant,

Ranjit Singh Vs. Commandant and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1968P& H7

of the petitioner. The Enquiry Officer, on the evidence, found against the petitioner. On September 3, 1960, the Commandant of the Punjab Armed Police at Jullundur Cantt., on those findings ordered the forfeiture permanently of two years'

Southern Naval Command Civil Employees Association Vs. Flag Officer Co ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ1052Ker

in the INS Venduruthy ;(c) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction commanding respondents 1 to 3 to grant minimum wages notified under the Minimum Wages Act to the petitioners and

The Commanding Officer, Inhs and anr. and Gopinathan Etc. Etc. Vs. Y.C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1994)96BOMLR651; (1995)IILLJ891Bom

S.P. Kundukar, J. 1. This group of 9 writ petitions filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the contempt petition filed by one of the respondents, can be disposed of...

M. Mathiazhagan and V. Vijayakumaran Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Repr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2005)2MLJ405

aspects. In this regard, it is pertinent to refer the letter, dated 13.5.1997, addressed by the HQ Maintenance Command, Nagpur to the second petitioner, which reads as follows:'FIXATION OF SENIORITY : CIVILIANS GP 'C'INDUSTRIAL; SHRI M. MATHIALAGANFMT(A)(SKILLED)PA

Commanding Officer Railway Protection Special Force Mumbai Vs. Bhavnab ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

2023INSC859 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3592 OF2019COMMANDING OFFICER, RAILWAY PROTECTION SPECIAL FORCE, MUMBAI … Appellant Versus BHVANABEN DINSHBHAI BHABHOR & OTHERS ...Respondents JUDGMENT MANOJ MISRA, J.1. This appeal...