Comber - Judgment Search Results
Kiran Combers and Spinners Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-1998
Reported in: (1998)(101)ELT40TriDel
samples. I also impose a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- only (Rupees one lakh only) on importers M/s. Kiran Combers & Spinners, Ludhiana under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962." 2. Being aggrieved by the above order,
Punjab Wool Combers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-07-1999
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT423Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The present application for early hearing relates to Appeal No. C.662-V/97-Bom. The Appeal has been filed against a communication dated 3-6-1997 form the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. The communication is reproduced below : Sub :...
Wool Combers of India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-1993
Reported in: (1994)LC611Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal against the order dated 13-4-1988 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants sought classification of their product, 'Lanolin...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Panjab Wool Combers Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-1994
Reported in: (1994)(71)ELT844TriDel
an excisable commodity assessable to duty under Item 68 C.E.T. In the proceedings initiated against assessee/appellants, Punjab Wool Combers, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Ludhiana, held scoured wool is classifiable under Item 68 CET and confirmed
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kiran Combers and Spinners
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-2006
Reported in: 2007ACJ532; AIR2007SC393; 2007(2)ALD16(SC); 2007(2)AWC1243(SC); [2007]135CompCas192(SC); I(2007)CPJ1(SC); [2007(2)JCR289(SC)]; (2007)1MLJ761(SC); RLW2007(3)SC2150; 2006AIRSCW6292
in Original Petition No. 74/1994 on 18.7.2003.2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are:The respondent/complainant M/s Kiran Combers & Spinners filed its complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of United India Insurance Company. The
Collr. of C. Ex. Vs. Angora Wool Combers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-26-1997
Reported in: (1998)(100)ELT317TriDel
issue involved in this case has already been considered by the Tribunal in the case of Punjab Wool Combers Ltd., as per Order No. E/186-187/94-D dated 6-4-1994 1994 (71) E.L.T. 844 (Tribunal).6. The point to be considered
Cce Vs. Punjab Wool Comber Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2007
Reported in: (2007)(122)ECC66
and holding that no interest was chargeable as was held by the adjudicating authority.2. The respondent, Punjab Wool Combers Ltd., was availing modvat credit facility on inputs as well as capital goods. It was noticed during the
Collector of C. Excise Vs. Doon Valley Combers (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-1994
Reported in: (1994)(74)ELT885TriDel
appeal(s) in the above manner." 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that M/s. Doon Valley Combers are engaged in the manufacture of Wool-Tops from raw wool. A dispute arose whether the goods described as
Asstt. Cit Vs. Ram Sahai Wool Combers (P) Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jun-25-2004
Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Chd.)699
These two appeals by the revenue are directed against separate orders both dated 12-9-2003, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99 in not upholding the action of the assessing officer in...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free