Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 5 acquisition of rights of owners of coke oven plants Page 1 of about 34 results (0.229 seconds)

Dec 10 1982 (SC)

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

..... already nationalised under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act are left out of the coal mines (taking over of management) act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. of course, coke oven plants situated away from the mines are not touched by either the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 or the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972.7. the final result of these statutes is that all coal mines known to exist in the country are nationalised, whether they are coking coal mines or non-coking coal mines .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2010 (HC)

Harsha NitIn Kokate Vs. the Saraswat Co­op. Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2014

..... dr. m faruqui (supra) that the term vest is a word of variable import. in that judgment the right, title and interest of the coke oven plant which is vested in the central government under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was considered. in that case the appeal of the company, in which the right, title and interest of the owners of the plants ..... for which the vesting in possession alone would take place; the ownership would not vest.23. considering some of these judgments it has been held in the case of bharat coking coal ltd. v. karam chand thapar & bros. 2002 (8) scale 388 that the term vest in common english acceptation would mean and imply conferment of ownership of properties upon a person .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1976 (HC)

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. Kalachand Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ27Cal

..... that the writ of mandamus issued by the learned judge in the trial court declaring the respondent-petitioner kalachand mitra to be entitled to the benefits of section 17 of coking coal mines (nationalisation act) 1972 must be upheld. it is not in dispute that the said respondent would be entitled to such benefits if it be found that immediately before the appointed day ..... , 1971 and the 'appointed day' as mentioned hereinbefore remained the same. thereafter, on or about january 12, 1972, bharat coking coal ltd., the appellants herein, a government company, were appointed as the custodian of the said colliery. then came the parliamentary legislation of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 on august 17, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 1972 act), making provisions for the acquisition and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2002 (SC)

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2002(9)SC267; (2003)1SCC6

..... before this court is as to whether the buildings and structures said to be belonging to the appellant can be termed to be a mine within the meaning of section 3(j)(vi) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. the said statutory provision reads as below:'3.(j)(vi)-all lands, buildings, works, adits, levels, plants, ..... to or in a mine or in connection with a mine or relating to a mine. some kind of nexus has to be there before any building or any ..... machinery and equipments, vehicles, railways, tramways and sidings belonging to or in, or about a mine.'it is on this score, the high court in appeal stated as below:'therefore, one has to construe section 3(j)(vi) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 as providing for 'all lands, buildings, works, adits, levels and sidings belonging .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1980 (SC)

Tara Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1682; (1980)4SCC179; [1980]3SCR1042

..... they are two distinct minerals.in support of these submissions shri seervai relies very strongly on the definition of 'coal mine' in section 2(b) of the coal mines (nationalisation act, 26 of 1973, and the definition, by contrast, of 'coking coal mine' in section 3(c) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 36 of 1972.54. these submissions are met by the learned attorney general with the answer that if ..... point the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1973 cover the whole field of 'coal' which was intended to be nationalised. the titles of the two acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines : mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively; mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal; and mines containing seams of other coal. though .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1980 (SC)

industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1858; [1980(41)FLR248]; (1980)4SCC341; [1981]1SCR375; 1980(12)LC863(SC)

..... by the central government, in the public interest, of the management of 214 coking coal mines and 12 coke oven plants, including the coal mines in question, pending nationalisation of such mines. the ordinance was replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971. thereafter, parliament enacted the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to complete the process of nationalisation of the coking coal mines and coke oven plants. it was entitled as 'an act to provide for the ..... acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners of the coking coal mines specified in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2006 (HC)

Bhanu Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR298(Jhr)]

..... learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that some back grounds would be necessary for better appreciation of this case and those are that the coal mines was taken by the erstwhile colliery from the rightful owner under permanent settlement through a registered deed giving some right over the lease hold area ..... and after settlement the erstwhile colliery were doing mining operation until nationalization of the coal mines by virtue of enactment of cooking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972. after nationalization, the petitioners had been doing mining operation without any hindrance till the year 1999, when forest official directed the chief ..... stated herein.3. or 26.8.2003 during the routine inspection forest guard noticed that the petitioners by deployment of huge work force extracted and mined out coal about 900 mt from the ghanudih protected forest area. thereupon the opposite parly no. 2 filed a prosecution report. upon which the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2007 (HC)

Bastacolla Colliery Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India a ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR544(Jhr)]

..... of the court below on the ground that the learned court below had committed serious error of law in misconstruing and misreading the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act and that the learned court below had failed to frame relevant issue on the basis of the pleadings of the parties including the ..... dues. further pleadings of the contesting defendants was that the plaintiff-bank has filed his claim before the commissioner of payments in accordance with the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 and, therefore, the bank could not simultaneously resort to filing its claim by way of civil suit.4. on the basis of ..... the instant case. this plea of the appellant is also not tenable.15. section 23 of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 contains provisions wherein parties having any claim against the erstwhile owner of a coal mine which has vested under the provisions of nationalization act, may prefer a claim before the commissioner of payments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1998 (HC)

Employees in Relation to Industry Colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. ...

Court : Patna

..... to as the emergency provisions act), which provided for taking over of the management of the coking coal mines by the central government from the appointed day i.e. october 17, 1971. thereafter coking coal mines (nationalisation act), 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act) was passed, whereby and whereunder on the appointed day, i.e. may 1 ..... , 1972 the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the first schedule stood transferred to ..... in which these workmen were working till june 9, 1971. by operation of section 4 of the nationalisation act, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines stood transferred to and vested in the central government, free from all encumbrances. by the said act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1992 (HC)

Jaswant Worah and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT1; 1992(22)DRJ476

..... , 1990 passed by the 7th additional district judge, dhanbad in miscellaneous case no.54 etc. of 1985 where by the right of the petitioners to claim management compensation under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') was rejected on the ground that on-the date of vesting, the petitioners were neither the owners nor occupiers rather they were ..... for compensation as owner of the ganhcodih colliery in accordance with law. (4) the coal mines were nationalised by the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. under this act, the mines vested in the government with effect from 1st may, 1972. the act contains a schedule showing the various mines which come under the nationalisation scheme. the mines involved in this petition is shown as seriall no. 156, namely, ganhcodih, in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //