Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 5 acquisition of rights of owners of coke oven plants Court: rajasthan

Jul 12 1984 (HC)

Punjab National Bank and Etc. Vs. Official Liquidator and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1986Raj40; 1985(1)WLN484

..... company cannot be regarded as a mining company in as much as apart from coking coal mines and the coal mines which were nationalised under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the company has other assets also.10. the expression 'mining company' has been defined in section 3(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to mean a company owning a coking coal mine. the aforesaid definition implies that ..... a company would be a mining company under the aforesaid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1988 (HC)

Miss Richa JaIn Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas248(Raj)

..... minerals and properties ltd., in liquidation, were working on coal mines and marble mines. however, the coal mines were nationalised by the government of india under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, 1971, replaced by the coking coal mines. (emergency provisions) act, 1971, and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, as well as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it was also contended that the company had three mining leas'es at village bar, district pali, narvar, district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1988 (HC)

Sayar Vs. Judge, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN305

..... honest.the construction we have made of section 14(1) of the 1974 act is reinforced by this decision.10. the significant difference between section 9 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and section 5 of the 1974 act is the presence of sub-section (2)in section 5 of the. 1974 act and exclusion from ..... to be liable. this conclusion was reached on construction of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 and sub-section (1) of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. there is no dispute that sub-section (1) of section 17 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 of that act ..... plain language of these provisions.9. the supreme court decision in bharat coking coal ltd. (supra) related to a dismissed workman of colliery which was nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the bharat coking coal ltd. by virtue of the provisions contained in the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. this change occurred during the pendency of an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1985 (HC)

Maharaval Lakshmansingh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)

..... , vol. viii, the word 'occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , and it was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //