Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR1529
ORDERKudoor, J.1. In this Writ Petition one under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, one Krishna Bhat, owner of Petition-A' Schedule properties, has sought for a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Order quashing the order dated 16-11-1981 Annexure-A, passed by the 1st respondent-Land Tribunal, Bantwal, granting occupancy fight in respect of 'A' Schedule properties in favour of the 3rd respondent-Narayana Gowda.2. The matter arises in this way :The 3rd respondent made an application on 23-8-1974 to the Land Tribunal, Bantwal, in Form-7 as required under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, claiming occupancy right in respect of S. No. 8/9A of Vittal Padnur Village of Bantwal Taluk belonging to one Mahalinga Bhatta as could be seen from the entry made in the General Daily Register (GDR) at Sl. No. 4712. In the year 1980, the 3rd respondent appeared to have filed a copy of Form-7 application said to be the copy of the application made by hi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1988KAR900; (1988)IILLJ400Kant
..... covered by the substantive part of section 79 and it was not covered by the explanation thereto. the supreme court thus held that non-filing of return contemplated by the mines act was an offence committed once and for all and it was not a continuing offence. the principle laid down in the said decision is that non-filing of the ..... proper accounts or not. 13. learned counsel, sri sastry, for the accused relied on state of bihar v. deokaran nenshi, : 1973crilj347 it was a case under the mines act, 1952. section 66 of the mines act, 1952 provides that any person omitting, inter alia, to furnish any return, notice, etc., in the prescribed form or manner or at or within the prescribed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ393; ILR2007(3)Kar3755; 2007(5)AIRKarR257; AIR2007NOC2234
..... of the state and its northern end, effective supervision is the first casualty. centralised administrative control is detrimental to efficiency and quality service. the central office is away from the nationalised 9 districts of northern karnataka. it was therefore, decided that separate corporations be formed one for bombay-karnataka area, one for hyderabad karnataka area and one for the remaining districts ..... for 4 districts of dharwad, karwar, belgaum and bijapur districts.3) corporation for bidar, gulberga raichur and bellary districts.4) corporation for the remaining districts of old mysore and the nationalised areas.the modalities of setting up of new company/corporations will be worked out by k.s.r.t.c.it was followed by the impugned order at annexure-b .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR2794
..... was noted that although under the scheme of the act there is no provision for conductors to be taken, yet, on the conversion of the cc into stage carriages, following nationalisation, there was an immediate need for conductors to man these vehicles. under the emergent circumstances then prevailing, it appears that the corporation was obliged to take in a large number .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : II(1998)ACC625
Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. All these appeals arise out of the common Judgment I Award dated 23rd October, 1991, delivered by Sri. Mohamad Anwar, Member he Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chikmangalur, in M.V.C. Nos. 198, 199, 215, 218, 220, 221, 225, 229, 228, 239, 240, 245, 246, 247, 250, 287, 283, 289, 304, , 311 and 435 of 1989, arising out of one and the same accident. The scope of these (sic) is confined to the quantum of compensation. No cross-objection or cross- (sic) has been filed by the respondents:2. The facts of the case in brief are that on 27th of May, 1989, the claimants (sic) claim petitions, except the two M.V.C. Nos. 214 and 311 of 1989, are the sons who had been injured, while in M.V.C. Nos. 214 and 314, claim petitions (sic) been preferred by L.Rs. of the two persons, who had died as a result of injuries (sic) sed to them, on account of motor vehicle accident.3. Appeal Nos. M.F.A. 680 of 1992 and 671 of 1992, are the appeals filed by heirs of the deceased persons, who...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2005Kant330; 2005(4)KarLJ359
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. All these petitions are by persons who have dealings in the notified agricultural produce, as the expression occurs within the meaning of Sub-section (28) of Section 2 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 (for short, 'the Act').2. While most of the petitioners are in fact what is known as 'market functionaries', within the meaning of this phrase as it occurs in Sub-section (21) of Section 2 of the Act and are also licensed market functionaries, having sought for and obtained licences to function so within the notified area in respect of the Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMC), only the petitioner in W.P. No. 39753 of 2004, namely M/s. ITC Limited, is not a licensed market functionary within the market area of the APMC, Doddaballapur, within which area this petitioner has some activities in relation to the notified agricultural produces namely wheat and other produces.3. Petitioners have approached this Court ev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2004KAR1892; 2004(3)KarLJ310
..... the settlement as between the workmen and the corporation the industrial disputes act is a special legislation and the life insurance corporation act a general legislation. likewise when compensation on nationalisation is the question, the life insurance corporation act is the special statute, an application of the generalia maxim as expounded, by english textbooks and decisions leaves us in no doubt ..... the life insurance corporation act does not speak at all with specific reference to workmen. on the other hand, its powers relate to the general aspects of nationalisation, of management when private businesses are nationalised and a plurality of problems which, incidentally, involve transfer of service of existing employees of insurers. the workmen qua workmen and industrial disputes between workmen and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1994]79CompCas722(Kar); 1991(4)KarLJ148
..... between the directors namely, respondent no. 3 staff, labour and mosaic department, petitioner-sales promotion, respondent no. 4, accounts and purchase, respondent no. 2, general administration and respondent no. 5, mines. the claim made by the petitioner apart from being vain, is false to his own knowledge. it is admitted by the respondents that there were difficulties faced by the company ..... petitioner by stating that the company has been undergoing severe financial crisis on account of various factors including labour trouble, fixation of minimum wages, high cost of inputs like clay, coal and recession in the market and a state was reached when it was almost impossible to run the company without incurring heavy loss. the company was faced with demands from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2005KAR1605
ORDERGopala Gowda, J.1. (i) In these batch of Writ Petitions, the prayer in W.P. Nos. 33120-21 & 33237-29, 48429-38, 46814, 46815, 46816, 46817, 49936, 49937 and 51804/2003 filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSTRC)/North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter called as 'NWKRTC' in short) is to quash the Contract Carriage Permits granted to private operators, some of them are also contesting respondents in these petitions. The contentions urged in these petitions, objections filed by both State and permit holder respondents and other allied matters pertaining to these Writ Petitions are dealt with in paragraph 4 of this order.ii) In W.P.Nos. 30657-60 and 52160-61/2003 filed by private operators/permit holders of the vehicles, the prayer is to direct the State respondents not to enforce the terms, conditions and instructions issued in the Circular No. STA.6/PR-02/2003-04 dated 5.4.2003 issued by the Chairman, Karnataka State Transport Authority (here...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2005Kant205
ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. (i) In these batch of writ petitions, the prayer in W.P. Nos. 33120-21 and 33237-29, 48429-38, 46814, 46815, 46816, 46817, 49936, 49937 and 51804/2003 filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC)/North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter called as 'NWKRTC' in short) is to quash the Contract Carriage Permits granted to private operators, some of them are also contesting respondents in these petitions. The contentions urged in these petitions, objections filed by both State and permit holder respondents and other allied matters pertaining to these writ petitions are dealt with in paragraph 4 of this order.(ii) In W.P. Nos. 30657-60 and 52160-61/2003 filed by private operators/permit holders of the vehicles, the prayer is to direct the State respondents not to enforce the terms, conditions and instructions issued in the Circular No. STA.6/PR-02/2003-04, dated 5-4-2003 issued by the Chairman, Karnataka State Transport Authori...
Tag this Judgment!