Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 18 provident fund Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 379 results (0.202 seconds)

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... all the private and public sources of meeting material needs, not merely public possessions.'in sanjeev coke manufacturing co.'s case4 (supra) the 'material resources' were explained as:-'the next question for consideration is whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a law directing the policy of the state towards securing 'that the ownership and ..... control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good, coal is, of course, one of the most important ..... stood prior to its amendment by the 42nd amendment, as a result of the decision in eshavananda bharathi's case2, stood revived. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company v. bharat coking coal ltd. and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 , the judgment proceeded on the basis that article 31-c stood revived as it existed as .....

Amalgamated Electricity Company Limited Vs. the Workmen of Amalgamated ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ769Kant

..... -ii llj 17, held that during the pendency of an industrial dispute regarding the dismissal of workmen, the colliery having been nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the 1st respondent-company, when section 17 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act provided for continuance of their service notwithstanding the transfer of private ownership to the central government or the government company ..... they were not in the service of the undertaking on the date of vesting. as explained earlier, in the light of the law laid by the supreme court in bharat coking coal limited, 1978-ii llj 17, it is clear that when there is a statutory transfer of employees pursuant to the undertaking being taken over to the board and when the .....

Dr. M Basappa Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament, such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 ..... and 7 of the act providing for acquisition of the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable." the hon'ble apex ..... movement of iron ore and manganese ore; further, the petitioner has deliberately committed omissions and commissions while working as a director, in contravention of the mines and mineral development regulation act, 1957 (for short, 'mmdr act'); he issued 41 permits through his subordinate territorial officers during the year 2004 .....

H.V. Thimmegowda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3156; [2002(94)FLR928]; ILR2001KAR3683; 2001(4)KarLJ548

..... (63 of 1962); 18. the emergency risks (goods) insurance act, 1971 (50 of 1971); 19. the emergency risks (undertakings) insurance act, 1971 (51 of 1971); 20. the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972); 21. the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 vide act 46 of 1981, section 2'. from 'the economic offences (inapplicability of limitation) act, 1974', it ..... ) in relation to an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the central government or in relation to an establishment connected with a railway company, a major port, a mine or an oilfield or a controlled industry or in relation to an establishment having departments or branches in more than one state, the central government, and (ii) in relation to .....

Mrs. Surinder Kaur Nayak and anr. Vs. Chief Personnel Manager, Syndica ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1125; 2010(1)KarLJ234; (2010)ILLJ313Kant:2009(4)KCCRSN297:2009(4)AIRKarR379.

..... of the payment of gratuity act, 1972. in this connection, he has relied on the following decisions:(i) managing director, ecil, hyderabad v. b. karunakar : (1994)illj162sc (ii) bharath gold mines ltd. v. regional labour commissioner : ilr1986kar2755 and(iii) j.b. micheal d'souza v. appellate authority under payment of gratuity act, bangalore and ors. 2001 (5) klj 200.6. in ..... has held that non-furnishing of the report has prejudiced the delinquent officer gravely, and the order of dismissal on the alleged misconduct has been set aside.in bharat gold mines case (supra), this court has held that the employer has to take an independent decision after termination of service of an employee as to whether gratuity payable should at all .....

Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Now Known as Jsw Steel Ltd. Rep. by It ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KCCR2566(D.B)

..... question, therefore, directly arose for consideration. the question was, however, not decided in the minerva mills case. section 39 of the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974, had also declared that the act was enacted for giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principles specified in clause ..... the notification without even affording an opportunity to the parties concerned is contrary to the law laid down by the apex court in the case of sanjeev coke . and anr. reported in : air 1983 s.c. 239, which reads thus:11. we confess the case has left us perplexed. in ..... 11l/mmm/2004 karnataka government secretariatm.s. buildingbangalore, dt. 6.12.2004fromsecretary to government(mines, ssi & textiles)commerce and industries departmentbangalore - 560 001tothe secretary to government of indiaministry of coal and minesdepartments of minesshastri bhavannew delhisir,sub: mining lease applications filed by m/s. jindal vijayanagar steels limited and m/s. kalyani .....

Nanjanayaka and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant97; 1989(2)KarLJ202

..... any other instrument of transfer executed by the government for the time being the right to all precious metals, precious stones, coal and other minerals to be extracted by any process of mining from any lands whatsoever, shall vest absolutely in the government and the government shall have all the powers necessary for the ..... thereunder and the vested right to quarry granite is saved is a misnomer or a misconception.11. in hingir rampur coal co. ltd. v. state of orissa : [1961]2scr537 the validity of orissa mining areas development fund act authorising to levy of cess was challenged and in that context the supreme court examining the ..... win minerals whatever may be the position or circumstances and there is no statutory obligation on these authorities to grant lease in contravention of rules relating to mines act and other mandatory provisions contemplated under the explosives act; law relating to environment and ecology, pollution control act, forest preservation act, wild life protection .....

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

..... be preserved for a variety of tangible and intangible benefits. but there are a number of enterprises which have a major stake for their existence. some of these are i) mining ii) quarrying iii) resorts iv) hydro power projects v) wind mills vi) roads and highways.in the coming years we hope to bring out a integrated land use planning guidelines ..... crop insurance, a mandatory in eco-fragile areas around the reserves, with the participation of department of agriculture, followed by timely settlement of compensation/claims.6. need to provide farmers coal for tobacco curing barns under subsidy by tobacco board to wean them away from entering forests for firewood.7. need to specify time limit for settlement of compensations/claims towards .....

C.B. Bhandari Vs. Provident Fund Inspector, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas850(Kar); 1987(3)KarLJ244; (1988)IILLJ400Kant

..... covered by the substantive part of section 79 and it was not covered by the explanation thereto. the supreme court thus held that non-filing of return contemplated by the mines act was an offence committed once and for all and it was not a continuing offence. the principle laid down in the said decision is that non-filing of the ..... proper accounts or not. 16. learned counsel, sri sastry, for the accused relied on state of bihar v. deokaran nenshi, : 1973crilj347 . it was a case under the mines act, 1952. section 66 of the mines act, 1952, provides that any person omitting, inter alia, to furnish any return, notice, etc., in the prescribed form or manner or at or within the prescribed .....

Sri Sathyamoorthy S/O. Perumal Vs. the Secretary to the Government of ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ327

..... also lead to reduction in freight besides reduction in cost of the two essential raw materials used in steel making, namely coking coal and energy. the report also takes cognizance of the fact that in other countries, steel producers have captive mines.4.3. it is also brought to our notice that though the recommendation had been made by the high level committee ..... corporation limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956:provided also that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any mining lease (whether called mining lease, mining concession or by any other name) in force immediately before the commencement of this act in the union territory of goa, daman and dlu.(1a) no person ..... strain on the investments that may be made by the industrialists as well as financial aid that may be extended by the state or state-owned corporation or the nationalised banks in this regard.24. the writ petition is disposed of with the above said observations. .....